References
- Acs, Z. (2002), Innovation and the Growth of Cities, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Anselin, L.; Varga, A. & Acs, Z. (1997), ‘Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations,’ Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 422–448.
- Archibugi, D.; Filippetti, A. & Frenz, M. (2013a), ‘Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation?’ Research Policy, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 303–314.
- —— (2013b), ‘The impact of the economic crisis on innovation: Evidence from Europe,’ Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 1247–1260.
- Barca, F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Brussels: European Commission.
- Belyakov, V.; Izosimova, A.; Koski, A.; Prause, G. & Rudzite, M. (2010), ‘Promoting Dynamic Interaction of Universities and Regional Stakeholders,’ in J. W. Kramer, G. Prause & J. Sepp (eds.) Baltic Business and Socio-Economic Development 2007, Third International Conference Tallinn, Estonia, June 17–19, 2007, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 401–444.
- Bluhm, K.; Demmler, P.; Martens, B. & Trappmann, V. (2008), Fach- und Führungskräfte in mittelständischen Unternehmen: Bedarf, Rekrutierung und Bindung. Institut für Soziologie, Working Papers: Economic Sociology Jena, vol. 6.
- Bussmann, K. & Werle, M. (2004), ‘Kriminalität – Standortfaktor für betriebliche Entscheidungen?’ Neue Kriminalpolitik, no. 3, pp. 90–95.
- Brandt, A. (2010), ‘Branchenspezifische Standortfaktoren,’ RegioVision, vol. 3.
- Camagni, R. & Capello, R. (2013), ‘Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform,’ Growth and Change, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 355–389.
- Capello, R. & Lenzi C. (2012), ‘Territorial patterns of innovation: A taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe,’ The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 119–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0539-8
- Carlino, G.; Chatterjee, S. & Hunt, R. M. (2007), ‘Urban density and the rate of invention,’ Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 389–419.
- Ciccone, A. & Hall, R. (1996), ‘Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity,’ American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 54–70.
- Chinitz, B. (1961), ‘Contrasts in the agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh,’ American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 279–289.
- Clark, B. R. (2001), ‘The Entrepreneurial University: New Foundations for Collegiality, Autonomy, and Achievement,’ Higher Education Management, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 9–24.
- Cooke, P. & Morgan, K. (1998), The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- David, P.; Foray, D. & Hall, B. (2009), Measuring Smart Specialisation: The Concept and the Need for Indicators. Knowledge for Growth Expert Group. Retrieved from http://cemi.epfl.ch/files/content/sites/cemi/files/users/178044/public/ Measuring%20smart%20specialisation.doc [accessed Apr 2014]
- Duranton, G. & Puga, D. (2001), ‘Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle of Products,’ American Economic Review, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1454–1477.
- EC (2003), The Role of the Universities in the Europe of Knowledge, Communication from the Commission Brussels, COM(2003)58 final, 05.02.2003.
- —— (2010), Regional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe, Brussels: European Commission.
- Etzkowitz, H. (2003), ‘Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University- Industry Government Relations,’ Social Science Information, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 293–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
- EU (2009), Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3), Research policy, Luxembourg: European Union.
- Filippetti, A. & Archibugi, D. (2011), ‘Innovation in times of crisis: National Systems of Innovation, structure, and demand,’ Research Policy, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 179–192.
- Florida, R. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community & Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Fujita, M. & Krugman, P. (2004), ‘The new economy geography: Past, present and the future,’ Papers in Regional Science, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 139–164.
- GEM (2011), ‘Russia,’ Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2011, GEM 2011 Global Report, London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
- —— (2014), ‘GEM Global Report,’ Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2013, London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
- Goddard, J. (2000), The Response of HEIs to Regional Needs, Paris: OECD.
- Hadjimichalis, C. & Hudson, R. (2007), ‘Rethinking Local and Regional Development: implications for radical political practice in Europe,’ European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 99–113.
- Hansmann, K. & Höck, M. (2001), Standort Norddeutschland, Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.
- Hirsikoski, A.; Koski, A. & Prause, G. (2009), “Promoting Universities’ 3rd Task- Recommendations for University-Business Cooperation,” in G. Prause & T. Muravska (eds.) Baltic Business and Socio-Economic Development 2008, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 351–367.
- Iammarino, S. & McCann, P. (2006), ‘The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers,’ Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1018–1036.
- Innovation Union Scoreboard (2013), Innovation Union Scoreboard, Brussels: European Union.
- Jaffe, A.; Trajtenberg, M. & Henderson, R. (1993), ‘Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations,’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 577–598.
- Kröhnert, S.; Morgenstern, A. & Klingholz, R. (2007), Talente, Technology und Toleranz – wo Deutschland Zukunft hat, Berlin: Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung.
- Krugman, P. (1991), ‘Increasing returns and economic geography,’ Journal of Political Economy, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 483–499.
- Martens, B.; Michailow, M. & Schmidt, R., eds. (2003), Managementkulturen im Umbruch, Sonderforschungsbereich 580, vol. 10.
- McCann, P. (2008), ‘Globalisation and economic geography: the world is curved, not flat,’ Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 351–370.
- McCann, P. & Acs, Z. (2011), ‘Globalisation: countries, cities and multinationals,’ Regional Studies, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 17–32.
- McCann, P. & Ortega-Argiles, R. (2013), ‘Modern regional innovation policy,’ Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 187–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst007
- —— (2014, in press), ‘Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy,’ Regional Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0 0343404.2013.799769
- Meier zu Köcker, G. (2008), Clusters in Germany: An Empirical-based Insight View on Emergence, Financing, Management and Competitiveness of the Most Innovative Clusters in Germany, Berlin: Institute for Innovation and Technology & Initiative Competence Networks Germany.
- Niebuhr, A. (2006), ‘Migration and Innovation. Does Cultural Diversity Matter for Regional R&D Activity?’ HWWI Research Paper, vol. 3, no. 1, Hamburg: Hamburg Institute for International Economics.
- OECD (2010), Typology of regional innovation systems, Paris: OECD.
- —— (2011), Territorial Outlook, Paris: OECD.
- —— (2014), Innovation-driven Growth in Regions: The Role of Smart Specialisation, Paris: OECD.
- van Oort, F. (2004), Urban Growth and Innovation: Spatially Bounded Externalities in the Netherlands, Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: The Free Press.
- —— (2000), ‘Location, Competition and Economic Development: Local Networks in a Global Economy,’ Economic Development Quarterly, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–34. Prause, G. (2014, in press), ‘University – Business Interaction in Times of Demographic Change,’ Innovations.
- Prause, G. & Hunke, K. (2012), ‘University – Business Interaction in the Context of Demographic Change,’ in T. Muravska & G. Prause (eds.) European Integration and Baltic Sea Region Studies: University-Business Partnership through the Triple Helix Approach, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 188–199.
- Prause, G. & Winkler, K. (2011), “Universities’ third task: On the way towards the entrepreneurial university – A German Case Study,’ in G. Prause, U. Venesaar (eds.) University-Business Cooperation: Tallinn 2011, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts- Verlag, pp. 52–63.
- Radosevic, S. (2002), ‘Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe: determinants, organizers and alignments,’ The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 87–96.
- Sternberg, R. (2011), ‘Interregional Disparities, Entrepreneurship, and EU Regional Policy,’ in M. Minniti (ed.) The Dynamics of Entrepreneurship. Evidence from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data, Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 153–80.
- Thurner, T. (2014, in press), “Innovation in turbulent times – Russia’s North-Western Federal District and the financial crisis,” Regional Studies.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2014-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 (formerly 2228-0596) | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600 (formerly 2228-0596)
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 19
Published on: May 17, 2014
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2014 Gunnar Prause, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.