Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Smart Specialization and EU Eastern Innovation Cooperation: A Conceptual Approach Cover

Smart Specialization and EU Eastern Innovation Cooperation: A Conceptual Approach

TalTech Journal of European Studies
Volume 4 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
By: Gunnar Prause  
Open Access
|May 2014

References

  1. Acs, Z. (2002), Innovation and the Growth of Cities, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Anselin, L.; Varga, A. & Acs, Z. (1997), ‘Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations,’ Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 422–448.10.1006/juec.1997.2032
  3. Archibugi, D.; Filippetti, A. & Frenz, M. (2013a), ‘Economic crisis and innovation: Is destruction prevailing over accumulation?’ Research Policy, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 303–314.10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.002
  4. —— (2013b), ‘The impact of the economic crisis on innovation: Evidence from Europe,’ Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 1247–1260.10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.005
  5. Barca, F. (2009), An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Brussels: European Commission.
  6. Belyakov, V.; Izosimova, A.; Koski, A.; Prause, G. & Rudzite, M. (2010), ‘Promoting Dynamic Interaction of Universities and Regional Stakeholders,’ in J. W. Kramer, G. Prause & J. Sepp (eds.) Baltic Business and Socio-Economic Development 2007, Third International Conference Tallinn, Estonia, June 17–19, 2007, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 401–444.
  7. Bluhm, K.; Demmler, P.; Martens, B. & Trappmann, V. (2008), Fach- und Führungskräfte in mittelständischen Unternehmen: Bedarf, Rekrutierung und Bindung. Institut für Soziologie, Working Papers: Economic Sociology Jena, vol. 6.
  8. Bussmann, K. & Werle, M. (2004), ‘Kriminalität – Standortfaktor für betriebliche Entscheidungen?’ Neue Kriminalpolitik, no. 3, pp. 90–95.10.5771/0934-9200-2004-3-90
  9. Brandt, A. (2010), ‘Branchenspezifische Standortfaktoren,’ RegioVision, vol. 3.
  10. Camagni, R. & Capello, R. (2013), ‘Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform,’ Growth and Change, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 355–389.10.1111/grow.12012
  11. Capello, R. & Lenzi C. (2012), ‘Territorial patterns of innovation: A taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe,’ The Annals of Regional Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 119–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0539-810.1007/s00168-012-0539-8
  12. Carlino, G.; Chatterjee, S. & Hunt, R. M. (2007), ‘Urban density and the rate of invention,’ Journal of Urban Economics, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 389–419.10.1016/j.jue.2006.08.003
  13. Ciccone, A. & Hall, R. (1996), ‘Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity,’ American Economic Review, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 54–70.
  14. Chinitz, B. (1961), ‘Contrasts in the agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh,’ American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 279–289.
  15. Clark, B. R. (2001), ‘The Entrepreneurial University: New Foundations for Collegiality, Autonomy, and Achievement,’ Higher Education Management, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 9–24.
  16. Cooke, P. & Morgan, K. (1998), The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198290186.001.0001
  17. David, P.; Foray, D. & Hall, B. (2009), Measuring Smart Specialisation: The Concept and the Need for Indicators. Knowledge for Growth Expert Group. Retrieved from http://cemi.epfl.ch/files/content/sites/cemi/files/users/178044/public/ Measuring%20smart%20specialisation.doc [accessed Apr 2014]
  18. Duranton, G. & Puga, D. (2001), ‘Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life Cycle of Products,’ American Economic Review, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1454–1477.10.1257/aer.91.5.1454
  19. EC (2003), The Role of the Universities in the Europe of Knowledge, Communication from the Commission Brussels, COM(2003)58 final, 05.02.2003.
  20. —— (2010), Regional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe, Brussels: European Commission.
  21. Etzkowitz, H. (2003), ‘Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University- Industry Government Relations,’ Social Science Information, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 293–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0539018403042300210.1177/05390184030423002
  22. EU (2009), Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3), Research policy, Luxembourg: European Union.
  23. Filippetti, A. & Archibugi, D. (2011), ‘Innovation in times of crisis: National Systems of Innovation, structure, and demand,’ Research Policy, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 179–192.10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.001
  24. Florida, R. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community & Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Fujita, M. & Krugman, P. (2004), ‘The new economy geography: Past, present and the future,’ Papers in Regional Science, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 139–164.10.1007/s10110-003-0180-0
  26. GEM (2011), ‘Russia,’ Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2011, GEM 2011 Global Report, London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
  27. —— (2014), ‘GEM Global Report,’ Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2013, London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
  28. Goddard, J. (2000), The Response of HEIs to Regional Needs, Paris: OECD.
  29. Hadjimichalis, C. & Hudson, R. (2007), ‘Rethinking Local and Regional Development: implications for radical political practice in Europe,’ European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 99–113.10.1177/0969776407076290
  30. Hansmann, K. & Höck, M. (2001), Standort Norddeutschland, Hamburg: Universität Hamburg.
  31. Hirsikoski, A.; Koski, A. & Prause, G. (2009), “Promoting Universities’ 3rd Task- Recommendations for University-Business Cooperation,” in G. Prause & T. Muravska (eds.) Baltic Business and Socio-Economic Development 2008, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 351–367.
  32. Iammarino, S. & McCann, P. (2006), ‘The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers,’ Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1018–1036.10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.004
  33. Innovation Union Scoreboard (2013), Innovation Union Scoreboard, Brussels: European Union.
  34. Jaffe, A.; Trajtenberg, M. & Henderson, R. (1993), ‘Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations,’ The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 577–598.10.2307/2118401
  35. Kröhnert, S.; Morgenstern, A. & Klingholz, R. (2007), Talente, Technology und Toleranz – wo Deutschland Zukunft hat, Berlin: Berlin-Institut für Bevölkerung und Entwicklung.
  36. Krugman, P. (1991), ‘Increasing returns and economic geography,’ Journal of Political Economy, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 483–499.10.1086/261763
  37. Martens, B.; Michailow, M. & Schmidt, R., eds. (2003), Managementkulturen im Umbruch, Sonderforschungsbereich 580, vol. 10.
  38. McCann, P. (2008), ‘Globalisation and economic geography: the world is curved, not flat,’ Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 351–370.10.1093/cjres/rsn002
  39. McCann, P. & Acs, Z. (2011), ‘Globalisation: countries, cities and multinationals,’ Regional Studies, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 17–32.10.1080/00343404.2010.505915
  40. McCann, P. & Ortega-Argiles, R. (2013), ‘Modern regional innovation policy,’ Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 187–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst00710.1093/cjres/rst007
  41. —— (2014, in press), ‘Smart Specialisation, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy,’ Regional Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0 0343404.2013.799769
  42. Meier zu Köcker, G. (2008), Clusters in Germany: An Empirical-based Insight View on Emergence, Financing, Management and Competitiveness of the Most Innovative Clusters in Germany, Berlin: Institute for Innovation and Technology & Initiative Competence Networks Germany.
  43. Niebuhr, A. (2006), ‘Migration and Innovation. Does Cultural Diversity Matter for Regional R&D Activity?’ HWWI Research Paper, vol. 3, no. 1, Hamburg: Hamburg Institute for International Economics.
  44. OECD (2010), Typology of regional innovation systems, Paris: OECD.
  45. —— (2011), Territorial Outlook, Paris: OECD.
  46. —— (2014), Innovation-driven Growth in Regions: The Role of Smart Specialisation, Paris: OECD.
  47. van Oort, F. (2004), Urban Growth and Innovation: Spatially Bounded Externalities in the Netherlands, Aldershot: Ashgate.
  48. Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: The Free Press.10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1
  49. —— (2000), ‘Location, Competition and Economic Development: Local Networks in a Global Economy,’ Economic Development Quarterly, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–34. Prause, G. (2014, in press), ‘University – Business Interaction in Times of Demographic Change,’ Innovations.10.1177/089124240001400105
  50. Prause, G. & Hunke, K. (2012), ‘University – Business Interaction in the Context of Demographic Change,’ in T. Muravska & G. Prause (eds.) European Integration and Baltic Sea Region Studies: University-Business Partnership through the Triple Helix Approach, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, pp. 188–199.
  51. Prause, G. & Winkler, K. (2011), “Universities’ third task: On the way towards the entrepreneurial university – A German Case Study,’ in G. Prause, U. Venesaar (eds.) University-Business Cooperation: Tallinn 2011, Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts- Verlag, pp. 52–63.
  52. Radosevic, S. (2002), ‘Regional innovation systems in Central and Eastern Europe: determinants, organizers and alignments,’ The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 87–96.10.1023/A:1013152721632
  53. Sternberg, R. (2011), ‘Interregional Disparities, Entrepreneurship, and EU Regional Policy,’ in M. Minniti (ed.) The Dynamics of Entrepreneurship. Evidence from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Data, Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 153–80.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580866.003.0008
  54. Thurner, T. (2014, in press), “Innovation in turbulent times – Russia’s North-Western Federal District and the financial crisis,” Regional Studies.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2014-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 19
Published on: May 17, 2014
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
EU Eastern cooperation,
Innovation Policy,
regional development,
smart growth,
smart specialization
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Computer sciences, other,
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other,
Law,
Law, other,
Social sciences,
Social sciences, other

© 2014 Gunnar Prause, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 4 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)Next article