Abstract
There is general agreement that art is protected by the First Amendment. But what is art? As the nature of art has itself radically evolved, the notoriously unanswerable question has become even knottier. Courts have addressed the issue with a mélange of old fashioned and ill fitting criteria, but one Supreme Court dissenter has proffered an alternative, implicitly accepting the theory of the renowned art critic and philosopher, Arthur Danto.
Language: English
Published on: Mar 21, 2025
Published by: Birmingham City University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2025 Thomas Halper, published by Birmingham City University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.