Table 1
Use of the word “Exoneration”.
| Use of word “Exoneration” | |
|---|---|
| Yes | 426 (24.8%) |
| No | 1,291 (75.2%) |
| Total | 1,717 |
Table 2
Questioning the Exoneree's Innocence 86
| Innocence Questioned | |
|---|---|
| Yes | 235 (22.7%) |
| No | 801 (77.3%) |
| Total | 1,036 |
Table 3
Who Questions Innocence? 90
| Speaker | Percentage of Times Innocence is Questioned |
|---|---|
| State | 177 (68.3%) |
| Advocate for Victim | 45 (17.5%) |
| Juror | 7 (2.7%) |
| Citizen | 26 (10%) |
| Newspaper | 4 (1.5%) |
| Total of Speakers who Questioned Innocence | 259 |
Table 4
Questioning Innocence in DNA Exonerations
| Innocence Questioned | |
|---|---|
| DNA Case | 41 (17.5%) |
| Non-DNA Case | 194 (82.5%) |
| Total Number of Articles in Which Innocence is Questioned | 235 |
Table 5
Who Questions Innocence?
| Speakers Questioning Innocence | DNA Cases | Non-DNA Cases |
|---|---|---|
| State | 37 (90.4%) | 129 (66.5%) |
| Advocate of Victim | 2 (4.8%) | 32 (16.5%) |
| Juror | 1 (2.4%) | 6 (3.1%) |
| Citizen | 1 (2.4%) | 23 (11.8%) |
| Newspaper | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (2.1%) |
| Total Number of Speakers Questioning Innocence | 41 | 194 |
Table 7
Who Is Blamed for the Wrongful Conviction? 116
| Blamed | |
|---|---|
| Individual Actor | 221 (59.4%) |
| The State | 137 (36.8%) |
| The Exoneree | 1 (3.8%) |
| Total | 372 |