Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
(Mis)judging Ordinary Meaning?: Corpus Linguistics, the Frequency Fallacy, and the Extension-Abstraction Distinction in “Ordinary Meaning” Textualism Cover

(Mis)judging Ordinary Meaning?: Corpus Linguistics, the Frequency Fallacy, and the Extension-Abstraction Distinction in “Ordinary Meaning” Textualism

British Journal of American Legal Studies
Volume 8 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)
By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2019
Authors

Authors

Shlomo Klapper

shlomo.klapper@yale.edu

Yale Law School
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjals-2019-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5864 (formerly 2049-4092) | Journal ISSN: 2049-4092
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 327 - 369
Published on: Dec 31, 2019
Published by: Birmingham City University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Corpus Linguistics,
Originalism,
Statutory Interpretation,
Legal Interpretation,
Yates,
Marshall,
Interpretative Methods
Related subjects:
Law,
History, philosophy and sociology of law,
International law, foreign law, comparative law,
International law, foreign law, comparative law, other,
Public law,
Public law, other

© 2019 Shlomo Klapper, published by Birmingham City University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 8 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)
Previous article
Next article