Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Variability of Anthoxanthum species in Poland in relation to geographical-historical and environmental conditions: isozyme variation Cover

Variability of Anthoxanthum species in Poland in relation to geographical-historical and environmental conditions: isozyme variation

Biodiversity Research and Conservation
Volume 30 (2013): Issue 2013 (June 2013)
By:   
Open Access
|Oct 2013
References

References

  1. Abha J., Roy A. K., Kaushal P., Malaviya D. R. & Zadoo S. N. 2006. Isozyme banding pattern and estimation of genetic diversityamong Guinea grass germplasm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53: 339-347.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Angelov G. B. & Ivanova T. A. 2012. Isoenzyme variation and genetic affinities among four species of the genusL. (Poaceae). Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 28: 3-8.J.. Population dynamics ofon a zinc mine. Journal of Ecology 60: 351-365.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Badr A., Sayed-Ahmed H., El-Shanshou ri A. & Watson L. E. 2002. Ancesors of white clower (L.) as revealed by isozyme polymorphism. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106: 143-148.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Barrett S. C. H. & Shore J. S. 1989. Isozyme variation in colonizing plants. In: D. Soltis & P. Soltis (eds.). Isozymes in Plant Biology, pp. 106-126. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Borrill M. 1963. Experimental studies of evolution in(Graminae). Genetica 34(1): 183-210.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Blossey B. & R. Nötzold. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 83: 887-889.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Bretagnolle F. 2001. Pollen production and spontaneous polyploidization in diploid populations of. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 72: 241-247.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 596 pp. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Dixon J. M. 2002. Biological flora of the British Isles:L. J. Ecol. 90: 737-752.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Djebaili S. 1990. Syntaxonomie des groupements prèforetsiers et steppiques de l’Algérie aride. Ecologia Mediterranea 16: 231-244.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Drapikow ska M. 2013. Variability ofspecies in Poland in relation to geographical-historical and environmental conditions: morphological and anatomical variation. Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 30: 3-61.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Drapikowska M. & Krzakowa M. 2009. Morphological an biochemical variation among common reed () populations in northwest Poland. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 38(2): 29-38.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Drapikowska M., Celka Z., Szkudlarz P. & Jackowiak B. 2011. Zmienność morfologiczna populacjiFragm. Flor. Geobot. Polonica 18(2): 281-293.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Drapikowska M., Leśniewska K., Hasterok R., Szkudlarz P., Celka Z. & Jackow iak B. 2013. Variability of stomata and 45S and 5S rDNAs loci characteristics in two species ofgenus:.and.(Poaceae). 2013. Acta Biologica Hungarica 64(3).
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Ellmer M., Predice H. C. & Anderson S. 2011. The structuring of quantitative genetic variation in a fragmented population of(Poaceae). Evol. Ecol. 25: 509-523.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Enzyme [Internet]. Enzyme nomenclature database. 2010. [cited 2010 Aug 8]; Available from: http://www.expasy.ch/enzyme/
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Ellstrand N. C. & Schierenbeck K. 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97: 7043-7050.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Excoffier L., Smuse P. E. & Quatro J. M. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrian DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Felber F. 1988. Distribution des cytodemes d’L. s. lat. en France et dans les regions limitrophes. Bulletin de Societe Botanique Francaise. 135. Lettres Botanique 131: 281-293.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Felber-Girard M., Felber F. & Buttler A. 1996. Habitat differentiation in narrow hybrid zone between diploid and tetraploid. New Phytol. 133: 531-540.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Fernández-Moya J., San Miguel-Ayanz A., Cañellas I. & Gea-Izquierdo G. 2010. Variability in Mediterranean annual grassland diversity driven by small-scale changes in fertility and radiation. Plant Ecol 212(5): 865-877. DOI 10.1007/s11258-010-9869-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Filipová L. & Krahulec F. 2006. The transition zone betweenandin the Karkonose Mts. Preslia 78: 317-330.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Flegrova M. & Krahulec F. 1999.and: Life history parameters at two different altitudes. Folia Geobotanica 34(1): 19-31.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Freeland J. R., Biss P., Conrad K. F. & Silvertown J. 2010. Selection pressures have coused genome-wide population differentiation ofdespite the potential for high gene flow. J. Evol. Biol. 23(4): 776-782. DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.210.01947.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Freeland J. R., Biss P. & Silvertown J. 2012. Contrasting patterns of pollen and seed flow influence the spatial genetic structure of sweet vernal grass () populations. J. Hered. 103(1): 28-35. DOI 10.1093/jhered/esr111. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Fowler N. 1982. Competition and coexistence in a North Carolina Grassland. III. Mixtures of component species. J. Ecology 70: 77-92.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Gifford A. L. S., Ferdy J. B. & Molofsky J. 2002. Genetic composition and morphological variation among populations of the invasive grass,. Can. J. Bot. 80: 779-785.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Goodman M. M., Stub er C. W., Lee C. N. & Johnson F. M. 1980. Genetic control of malate dehydrogenase isozymes in maize. Genetics 94: 153-168.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Gottlieb L. D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Progress in Phytochemistry 7: 1-46.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Hahn T., Kettle C. J., Jaboury Ghazoul E., Frei R., Matter P. & Pluess A. R. 2012. Patterns of Genetic Variation across Altitude in Three Plant Species of Semi-Dry Grasslands. PLoS ONE 7(8): e41608. DOI 10.1371/ journal.pone.0041608.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Hamrick J. L. & Godt M. J. W. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In A. H. D. Brown M. T. Clegg A. L. Kahler & Weir B. S. (eds.). Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources, pp. 43-63. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Hamrick J. L. & Loveless M. D. 1986. Allozyme variation in tropical trees: Techniques and preliminary results. Biotropica 18: 201-207.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Hamrick J. L. & Godt M. J. W. 1996. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Biol. Sci. 351: 1291-1298.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Jones K. 1964. Chromosomes and the nature and origin ofL. Chromosoma 15: 248-274.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Kapeluszny J. & Haliniarz M. 2010. Ekspansywne i zagrożone gatunki flory segetalnej w środkowo-wschodniej Polsce. Annales Universitas Mariae-Curie Skłodowska Lublin Polonia. 65(1): 26-33. DOI 10.2478/ v10081-010-0004-2
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Kimura M. & Crow J. F. 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49: 725-38.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Krzakowa M. 1996. Genetic diversity of(Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. Revealed by electrophoretically detected differences in peroxidases. In: C. Obinger, U. Burner, R. Eberman, C. Penel & H. Greppin (eds.). Plant peroxidases: biochemistry and physiology, pp. 184-189. University of Geneva.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Krzakowa M. & Celka Z. 2007. Intrapopulation variation ofL. (Roth.) revealed by electrophoretically detected ten izoenzyme systems. Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 5-8: 5-9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Krzakowa M. & Celka Z. 2008. Intraspecific differentiation of Reed Grass(Poaceae) populations revealed by peroxidase allozymes. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 77(4): 299-304.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Krzakowa M. & Dunajski A. 2007. Genetic differences and hybridization betweenand(Poaceae) in the anemo-orographic (AO) system in the Karkonosze Mountains. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 35: 23-28.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Kubešová M., Moravc ová L., Duda J., Jarošik W. & Pyšek P. 2010. Naturalized plants have smaller genomes than their non-invading relatives: a flow cytometric analysis of the Czech alien flora. Preslia 82: 81-96.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Lack A. J. & Kay Q. O. N. 1986. Phosphoglucose isomerase (EC 5.3.1.9) isozymes in diploid and tetraploidspecies: evidence for gene duplication and diversification. Heredity 56: 111-118.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Lange M. 1995.. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 46: 503-521.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. Latowski K. 2005. Ecological-biological reasons and sources of the invasive propensity ofBoiss. Thaiszia - J. Bot. Košice, 15, Suppl. 1: 143-152.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Lavergne S. & Molosky J. 2007. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of invasive grass. PNAS 104(10): 3883-3888.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Lumaret R. 1984. The role of ploidy in the adaptive significance of polymorphism at the GOT locus in theL. complex. Heredity 52: 153-169.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. Manly B. F. J. 1985. The Statistics of Natural Selection on Animal Populations. 500 pp. Chapman and Hall, London.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. Mirek Z. & Piękoś-Mirkowa H. 2003. Grasses of mountains of Poland. In: L. Frey (ed.). Problems of grass biology, pp. 95-118. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Mirek Z., Piękoś-Mirkowa H., Zając A. & Zając M. 2002. Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland. A checklist. In: Z. Mirek (ed.). Biodiversity of Poland, 1, 442 pp. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Mitton J. B. 1989. Selection in Natural Populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford-New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Mizianty M. 1991. Biosystematic studies on(Poaceae). 2. Original research. 2.2 Cytological differentiation of the genus in Poland. Fragm. Flor. Geobot. 36: 301-320.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89(3): 583-590.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. Nyberg Berglund A. B., Saura A. & Westerbergh A. 2006. Electrophoretic Evidence For Disomic Inheritance And Allopolyploid Origin Of the Octoploid(Caryophyllaceae). Journal of Heredity 97(3): 296-302. DOI 10.1093/jhered/esj029.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. Oja T. & Jaa ska V. 1998. Allozyme diversity and phylogenic relationships among diploid annual bromus (Poaceae). Ann. Bot. Fennici 35: 123-130.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Ohsawa T. & Ide Y. 2008. Global patterns of genetic variation in plant species along vertical and horizontal gradients on mountains. Global Ecology and Biogeography 17: 152-163.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Peakall R. & Smou se P. E. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 6(1): 288-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. Pimentel M., Catalan P. & Sahuquillo E. 2010. Morphological and molecular taxonomy of the annual diploidsand(Poaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula. Evidence of introgression in natural populations. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 164: 53-71.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  58. Pimentel Pereira M., Estevez Perez G. & Sahuquillo Balbuena E. 2007. European Sweet Vernal Grasses (: Poaceae, Pooideae, Aveneae): A Morphometric Taxonomical Approach. Systematic Botany 32(1): 43-59.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. Pimentel M. & Sahuquillo E. 2008. Relationships between the close congenersand(Poaceae, Pooideae) assessed by morphological and molecular methods. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 156: 237-252.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Prentis P. J., Wilson J. R. U., Dormontt E. E., Richardson D. M. & Lowe A. J. 2008. Adaptative evolution in invasive species. Trends in Plant Sciences 13(6): 288-294.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  61. Reeves G., Francis D., Davies M. S., Rogers H. J. & Hodkinson T. 1998. Genome size is negatively correlated with altitude in natural populations of. Annals of Botany 82, Suppl. A: 99-105.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Rozmus M. 1958. Cytological investigations ofL. et L. a new species of the flora in Poland. Acta Biol. Cracov. ser. Bot. 1: 171-184.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Silvertown J., Poulton. P., Johnson E., Grand E., Heard M. & Biss P. M. 2006. The parkgrassexperiment 1856-2006: its contribution to ecology. Journal of Ecology 94:801-814.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  64. Shahi B. B., Chu Y. E. & Oka H. J. 1969. Analysis of genes controlling peroxidase izozymes inand. Can. J. Genet. 15: 845-853.
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Skrajna T. & Skrzypc zyńska J. 2007. Wybrane cechy biologiczne i występowanieAnnales Univeritatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lublin-Polonia 62(2):145-155.
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Sneath P. H. A. & Sokal R. R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. 359 pp. Freeman W. H., San Francisco.
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Stoöcklin J. K. P. & Pluess A. 2009. Genetic diversity, phenotypic variation and local adaptation in the alpine landscape: case studies with alpine plant species. Bot. Helv. 119: 125-133.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Szmeja K. 1996.Boiss. - Ekspansywny chwast pól uprawnych Równiny Charzykowskiej. Zesz. Nauk. ATR Bydgoszcz 196, Rol. 38: 193-196.
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. Szweykow ski J. & Odrzyko ski I. 1990. Chemical differentiation of(L.) Dum. (Hepaticae, Aneuraceae) in Poland and some comments on application of enzymatic markers in bryology. Bryophytes. Their chemistry and taxonomy 437-448.
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. Śliwińska E. 2008. Zastosowanie cytometrii przepływowej do oznaczania DNA u roślin. Postępy Biologii Komórki 35(24): 165-176.
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. Tokarska-Guzik B. 2005. The Establishment and Spread of Alien Plant Species (Kenophytes) in the Flora of Poland. Prace naukowe Uniw. Śląskiego w Katowicach 2372: 1-192.
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. Weeden N. F. & Gottlieb L. D. 1980. The genetics of chloroplast enzymes. J. Heredity. 71: 392-396.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  73. Wendel J. F. & Weeden N. F. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: D. E. Soltis & P. S. Soltis (eds.). Isozymes in Plant Biology, pp. 5-45. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  74. Wright S. 1951. The genetic structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15: 323-354.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  75. Yeh C. F. & Boule T. 2000. Popgene 1.32: A free program for the analysis of genetic variation among and within populations using co-dominant and dominant markers. Department of Renewable Resources at University of Alberta, Canada.
    Search in Google Scholar
  76. Zhao Gui F., Felber F. & Kuepfer P. 2001. Subpopulation differentiation of(Poaceae) along an altitudinal gradient detected by random amplifiedpolymor phic DNA. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 38: 64-70.
    Search in Google Scholar
  77. Zeroua l-Humbert-Droz C. & Felber F. 1999. Evidence from isozyme analysis of autopolyploidy inA. & D. Love. Botanica Helvetica 109: 217-227.
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. Zeidler M. 2000. Electrophoretic analysis of plant isozymes. Acta Universitas Palackianae Olomucensis Facultas Rerum Naturalium Biologica 38: 7-16.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/biorc-2013-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2080-945X (formerly 1897-2810) | Journal ISSN: 1897-2810
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 93
Published on: Oct 26, 2013
Published by: Adam Mickiewicz University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Poaceae,
Anthoxanthum alpinum,
Anthoxanthum aristatum,
Anthoxanthum odoratum,
Poland,
isozymes,
genetic differentiation
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2013 Maria Drapikowska, published by Adam Mickiewicz University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 30 (2013): Issue 2013 (June 2013)
Previous article