Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evidence for Phase Transitions in Replication Fidelity and Survival Probability at the Origin of Life Cover

Evidence for Phase Transitions in Replication Fidelity and Survival Probability at the Origin of Life

BioCosmos: New perspectives on the origin and evolution of life
Volume 1 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)
By: Sy Garte  
Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Illustration of various model phase transitions from nonlife to life. Regions of the nonliving phase (no possible growth or evolution) are indicated in all figures by solid patterns, whereas the phase of life contains arrows suggesting continuous evolution to improvements in both survival and replication fidelity. A. Evolution without any phase transitions. This is the default assumption for many origin-of-life theorists. Arrows indicate that any starting values of P and F can lead to further growth and evolution. B. Phase transition at F = 0.5. Below that threshold, no growth or further evolution is possible, independent of P. C. Phase transition at F=0.5, P = 0.5. The threshold for life is a function of both P and F, at a fixed value.
Illustration of various model phase transitions from nonlife to life. Regions of the nonliving phase (no possible growth or evolution) are indicated in all figures by solid patterns, whereas the phase of life contains arrows suggesting continuous evolution to improvements in both survival and replication fidelity. A. Evolution without any phase transitions. This is the default assumption for many origin-of-life theorists. Arrows indicate that any starting values of P and F can lead to further growth and evolution. B. Phase transition at F = 0.5. Below that threshold, no growth or further evolution is possible, independent of P. C. Phase transition at F=0.5, P = 0.5. The threshold for life is a function of both P and F, at a fixed value.

Figure 2

Phase transition as a function of P and F from simulation data. This is a replot of Figure 1 from ref. 32 showing that the actual phase transition follows a specific trajectory dependent on both P and F.
Phase transition as a function of P and F from simulation data. This is a replot of Figure 1 from ref. 32 showing that the actual phase transition follows a specific trajectory dependent on both P and F.

Figure 3

An illustration of the general strategy used in the simulation model described in ref. 32 and in this text. Numbers in cells are the values for P. A. Perfect replication fidelity (F = 1.0) and survival probability (P = 1.0) results in each A and B cell having the exact value of P =1 as its parent. The growth rate of this cell population is the maximum value of 2.0 or a doubling of cell numbers with every generation. B. Changing the starting values of P and F to 0.9 and 0.7, respectively, the parental P value is inherited by some of the descendants of the original cell. Cell death (about 10% of parental cells) or a changed value of P in daughter B cells (due to mutations in 30% of B cells) are found in individual cells as cell divisions occur (see the Methods section for details on how mutations modify the value of P, as functions of the two parameters M and D). In this example the growth constant is reduced to 1.7.
An illustration of the general strategy used in the simulation model described in ref. 32 and in this text. Numbers in cells are the values for P. A. Perfect replication fidelity (F = 1.0) and survival probability (P = 1.0) results in each A and B cell having the exact value of P =1 as its parent. The growth rate of this cell population is the maximum value of 2.0 or a doubling of cell numbers with every generation. B. Changing the starting values of P and F to 0.9 and 0.7, respectively, the parental P value is inherited by some of the descendants of the original cell. Cell death (about 10% of parental cells) or a changed value of P in daughter B cells (due to mutations in 30% of B cells) are found in individual cells as cell divisions occur (see the Methods section for details on how mutations modify the value of P, as functions of the two parameters M and D). In this example the growth constant is reduced to 1.7.

Figure 4

Results from theoretical calculations as described in the text. A. Phase transitions as a function of P, F, and D > 5.0. B. Phase transitions for D < 1.0.
Results from theoretical calculations as described in the text. A. Phase transitions as a function of P, F, and D > 5.0. B. Phase transitions for D < 1.0.

Definitions of Symbols

PProbability of cell survival between replication events
PmValue of P after a mutation
FReplication fidelity as a probability of perfect replication
MMagnitude of the effect of a mutation on P
DRatio of deleterious to beneficial mutations
KGrowth constant of a cell population starting with a single cell
CCell number
CtCell number at t generations
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/biocosmos-2021-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2719-8634
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 2 - 10
Published on: Dec 5, 2021
Published by: The Israel Biocomplexity Center
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Evolution,
Continuity,
Saltation,
Theoretical Biology
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Biochemistry,
Life sciences,
Evolutionary biology,
Philosophy,
History of philosophy,
History of philosophy, other,
Physics,
Astronomy and astrophysics

© 2021 Sy Garte, published by The Israel Biocomplexity Center
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 1 (2021): Issue 1 (January 2021)