Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients for selected traits of Pinus sylvestris L. Cover

Comparison of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients for selected traits of Pinus sylvestris L.

Open Access
|Jan 2025

References

  1. Ahmadi K., Kalantar B., Saeidi V., Harandi E.K.G., Janizadeh S., Ueda N. (2020): Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Mapping the Stand Characteristics of Temperate Forests Using Multi-Spectral Sentinel-2 Data. Remote Sens 12:3019. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12183019
  2. Alaimo L.S., Arcagni A., Fattore M., Maggino F., Quondamstefano V. (2022): Measuring Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being in Italian Regions: The Non-aggregative Approach. Soc Indic Res 161: 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02388-7
  3. Ali A. (2019): Forest stand structure and functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges. Ecol Indic 98: 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.017
  4. Artusi R., Verderio P., Marubini E. (2002): Bravais-Pearson and Spearman Correlation Coefficients: Meaning, Test of Hypothesis and Confidence Interval. Int J Biol Markers 17: 148–151. DOI:10.1177/172460080201700213
  5. Bonett D.G., Wright T.A. (2000): Sample size requirements for estimating Pearson, Kendall and Spearman correlations. Psychometrika 65: 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294183
  6. Bravais A. (1846): Analyse mathématique sur les probabilités des erreurs de situation d’un point. Mémoires présentés par divers savants à l’Académie Royale des Sciences de l’Institut de France 9: 255–332.
  7. Broadhurst D.I., Kell D.B. (2006): Statistical strategies for avoiding false discoveries in metabolomics and related experiments. Metabolomics 2: 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-006-0037-z
  8. Carter B.E., Wiles J.R. (2014): Scientific consensus and social controversy: exploring relationships between students’ conceptions of the nature of science, biological evolution, and global climate change. Evo Edu Outreach 7: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0006-3
  9. Clutton-Brock T., Sheldon B.C. (2010): Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol Evol 25: 562–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.002
  10. Dormann C.F., Elith J., Bacher S., Buchmann C., Carl G., Carré G., Marquéz J.R.G., Gruber B., Lafourcade B., Leitão P.J., Münkemüller T., McClean C., Osborne P.E., Reineking B., Schröder B., Skidmore A.K., Zurell D., Lautenbach S. (2013): Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance Ecography 36: 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
  11. Dwyer R.G., Krueck N.C., Udyawer V., Heupel M.R., Chapman D., Pratt H.L., Garla R., Simpfendorfer C.A. (2020): Individual and Population Benefits of Marine Reserves for Reef Sharks. Curr Biol 30: 480–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.005
  12. Eisinga R., Grotenhuis M.T., Pelzer B. (2013): The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? Int J Public Health 58: 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
  13. Fontana M.D., de Araújo Moreira F., Di Giulio G.M., Malheiros T.F. (2020): The water-energy-food nexus research in the Brazilian context: What are we missing? Environ Sci Policy 112: 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.021
  14. Hauke J., Kossowski T. (2011): Comparison of values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficient on the same sets of data. Quaestiones Geographicae 30: 87–93. DOI:10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1
  15. Hohenlohe P.A., Funk W.C., Rajora O.P. (2021): Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management. Mol Ecol 30: 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15720
  16. Horváth I.G., Németh Á., Lenkey Z., Alessandri N., Tufano F., Kis P., Gaszner B., Cziráki A. (2010): Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens 28: 2068–2075. DOI:10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833c8a1a
  17. Hyyppä J., Hyyppä H., Inkinen M., Engdahl M., Linko S., Zhu Y.H. (2000): Accuracy comparison of various remote sensing data sources in the retrieval of forest stand attributes. For Ecol Manage 128: 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00278-9
  18. Iqbal W., Tang Y.M., Chau K.Y., Irfan M., Mohsin M. (2021): Nexus between air pollution and NCOV-2019 in China: Application of negative binomial regression analysis. Process Saf Environ Prot 150: 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.04.039
  19. Jankowski A., Wyka T.P., Oleksyn J. (2021): Axial variability of anatomical structure and the scaling relationships in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) needles of contrasting origins. Flora 274: 151747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2020.151747
  20. Lateef M., Keikhosrokiani P. (2023): Predicting Critical Success Factors of Business Intelligence Implementation for Improving SMEs’ Performances: a Case Study of Lagos State., Nigeria. J Knowl Econ 14: 2081–2106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00961-8
  21. Lefsky M.A., Hudak A.T., Cohen W.B., Acker S.A. (2005): Patterns of covariance between forest stand and canopy structure in the Pacific Northwest. Remote Sens Environ 95: 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.01.004
  22. Lin W.B. (2007): Factors affecting the correlation between interactive mechanism of strategic alliance and technological knowledge transfer performance. J High Technol Manage Res 17: 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2006.11.003
  23. Lindinger-Sternart S., Kaur V., Widyaningsih Y., Patel A.K. (2021): COVID-19 phobia across the world: Impact of resilience on COVID-19 phobia in different nations. Couns Psychother Res 21: 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12387
  24. Min Q., Lu Y., Liu Z., Su C., Wang B. (2019): Machine Learning based Digital Twin Framework for Production Optimization in Petrochemical Industry. Int J Inf Manage 49: 502–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.020
  25. Moews B., Herrmann J.M., Ibikunle G. (2019): Lagged correlation-based deep learning for directional trend change prediction in financial time series. Expert Syst Appl 120: 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.027
  26. Moradi F., Darvishsefat A.A., Pourrahmati M.R., Deljouei A., Borz S.A. (2022): Estimating Aboveground Biomass in Dense Hyrcanian Forests by the Use of Sentinel-2 Data. Forests 13: 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13010104
  27. Nakagawa S., Cuthill I.C. (2007): Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 82: 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x
  28. Neumann M., Starlinger F. (2001): The significance of different indices for stand structure and diversity in forests. For Ecol Manage 145: 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00577-6
  29. Noor M.B.T., Zenia N.Z., Kaiser M.S., Al Mamun S., Mahmud M. (2020): Application of deep learning in detecting neurological disorders from magnetic resonance images: a survey on the detection of Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenia. Brain Inf 7: 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-020-00112-2
  30. Nowosad K., Bocianowski J., Kianersi F., Pour-Aboughadareh A. (2023): Analysis of Linkage on Interaction of Main Aspects (Genotype by Environment Interaction, Stability and Genetic Parameters) of 1000 Kernels in Maize (Zea mays L.). Agriculture 13: 2005. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13102005
  31. Orsini L., Vanoverbeke J., Swillen I., Mergeay J., De Meester L. (2013): Drivers of population genetic differentiation in the wild: isolation by dispersal limitation, isolation by adaptation and isolation by colonization. Mol Ecol 22: 5983–5999. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12561
  32. Pearson K. (1896): Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. Phil Trans R Soc A 187: 253–318.
  33. Pearson K. (1908): On a mathematical theory of determinantal inheritance, from suggestions and notes of the late W. F. R. Weldon. Biometrika 6: 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/6.1.80
  34. Pearson K. (1920): Notes on the history of correlation. Biometrika 13: 25–45.
  35. Piovani J.I. (2008): The historical construction of correlation as a conceptual and operative instrument for empirical research. Qual Quant 42: 757–777.
  36. Puliti S., Breidenbach J., Astrup R. (2020): Estimation of Forest Growing Stock Volume with UAV Laser Scanning Data: Can It Be Done without Field Data? Remote Sens 12: 1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12081245
  37. Rosato A., Tenori L., Cascante M., De Atauri Carulla P.R., dos Santos V.A.P.M., Saccenti E. (2018): From correlation to causation: analysis of metabolomics data using systems biology approaches. Metabolomics 14: 37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-018-1335-y
  38. Rutledge J., Oh H., Wyss-Coray T. (2022): Measuring biological age using omics data. Nat Rev Genet 23: 715–727. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-022-00511-7
  39. Saalidong B.M., Aram S.A., Out S., Lartey P.O. (2022): Examining the dynamics of the relationship between water pH and other water quality parameters in ground and surface water systems. PLoS ONE 17: e0262117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262117
  40. Samal K., Mahapatra S., Ali H. (2022): Pharmaceutical wastewater as Emerging Contaminants (EC): Treatment technologies, impact on environment and human health. Energy Nexus 6: 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100076
  41. Schober P., Boer C., Schwarte L.A. (2018): Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia 126: 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
  42. Shimizu I., Kikukawa M., Tada T., Kimura T., Duvivier R., van der Vleuten C. (2020): Measuring social interdependence in collaborative learning: instrument development and validation. BMC Med Educ 20: 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02088-3
  43. Solon J., Borzyszkowski J., Bidłasik M., Richling A., Badora K., Balon J., Brzezińska-Wójcik T., Chabudziński Ł., Dobrowolski R., Grzegorczyk I., Jodłowski M., Kistowski M., Kot R., Krąż P., Lechnio J., Macias A., Majchrowska A., Malinowska E., Migoń P., Myga-Piątek U., Nita J., Papińska E., Rodzik J., Strzyż M., Terpiłowski S., Ziaja W. (2018): Physico-geographical mesoregions of Poland: Verification and adjustment of boundaries on the basis of contemporary spatial data. Geogr Pol 91: 143–170. DOI:10.7163/GPol.0115
  44. Song H.Y., Park S. (2020): An Analysis of Correlation between Personality and Visiting Place using Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient. KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst 14: 1951–1966. http://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2020.05.005
  45. Spearman C. (1904): The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things. The Amer J Psychol 15: 72–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159
  46. Stigler S.M. (1988): Francis Galton’s account of the invention of correlation. Stat Sci 4: 73–86.
  47. Thielmann I., Spadaro G., Balliet D. (2020): Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis Psychological Bulletin 146: 30–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217
  48. Tortella G.R., Rubilar O., Durán N., Diez M.C., Martínez M., Parada J., Seabra A.B. (2020): Silver nanoparticles: Toxicity in model organisms as an overview of its hazard for human health and the environment. J Hazard Mater 390: 121974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121974
  49. Tundys B., Bretyn A., Urbaniak M. (2021): Energy Poverty and Sustainable Economic Development: An Exploration of Correlations and Interdependencies in European Countries. Energies 14: 7640. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227640
  50. Udovičić M., Baždarić K., Bilić-Zulle L., Petrovečki M. (2007): What we need to know when calculating the coefficient of correlation? Biochemia Medica 17: 10–15.
  51. VSN International Genstat for Windows (2023): VSN International Genstat for Windows., 23rd Edition; VSN International: Hemel Hempstead, UK.
  52. Walker H.M. (1928): The relation of Plana and Bravais to theory of correlation. Isis 10: 466–484.
  53. Waszak N., Robertson I., Puchałka R., Przybylak R., Pospieszyńska A., Koprowski M. (2021): Investigating the Climate-Growth Response of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Northern Poland. Atmosphere 12: 1690. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12121690
  54. Weida F.M. (1927): On various conceptions of correlation. Ann Math 29: 276–312.
  55. Wright I.J., Ackerly D.D., Bongers F., Harms K.E., Ibarra-Manriquez G., Martinez-Ramos M., Mazer S.J., Muller-Landau H.C., Paz H., Pitman N.C.A., Poorter L., Silman M.R., Vriesendorp C.F., Webb C.O., Westoby M., Wright S.J. (2007): Relationships Among Ecologically Important Dimensions of Plant Trait Variation in Seven Neotropical Forests. Ann Bot 99: 1003–1015. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl066
  56. Wrońska-Pilarek D., Krysztofiak-Kaniewska A., Matusiak K., Bocianowski J., Wiatrowska B., Okoński B. (2023b): Does distance from a sand mine affect needle features in Pinus sylvestris L.? For Ecol Manage 546: 121276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121276
  57. Wrońska-Pilarek D., Maciejewska–Rutkowska I., Lechowicz K., Bocianowski J., Hauke–Kowalska M., Baranowska M., Korzeniewicz R. (2023a): The effect of herbicides on morphological features of pollen grains in Prunus serotina Ehrh. in the context of elimination of this invasive species from European forests. Sci Rep 13: 4657. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31010-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2024-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2199-577X | Journal ISSN: 1896-3811
Language: English
Page range: 115 - 135
Published on: Jan 9, 2025
Published by: Polish Biometric Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Jan Bocianowski, Dorota Wrońska-Pilarek, Anna Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, Karolina Matusiak, Blanka Wiatrowska, published by Polish Biometric Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.