Indexing and influence of Biomedical Human Kinetics
References
- Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., Chute, R., & Mailund, T. (2009) A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PLOS ONE, 4(6): e6022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006022
- Bornmann, L. (2014). How are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature. Research Evaluation, 23(2), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu002
- Delgado-Lopez-Cozar, E. & Cabezas-Clavjo, A. (2013). Ranking journals: Could google scholar metrics be an alternative to journal citation reports and scimago journal rank? Learned Publishing, 26, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1087/20130206
- Delgado-Quiros, L., & Ortega, J. L. (2025). Citation counts and inclusion of references in seven free-access scholarly databases: A comparative analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 19, Ar. 101618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101618
- Franceschet, M. (2010) The difference between popularity and prestige in the sciences and in the social sciences: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 4(1): 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.08.001
- Ghosh, J. S. (1975) Uncitedness of articles in nature, a multidisciplinary journal. Information Processing & Management, 11(5-7): 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(75)90005-9
- Gusenbauer, M. (2024). Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases’ citation indices. Research Synthesis Methods, 15, 802–817. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1729
- Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11, 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
- Halevi, G., Moed, H., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation— Review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics 11(3), 823–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.005
- Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9
- Herzog, C., Hook, D., & Konkiel, S. (2020). Dimensions: Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data. Research Evaluation, 1(1), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00020
- Jordan, K., & Tsai, S. P. (2024). Ranking ‘by relevance’ in academic literature searches: Prevalence, definitions, and implications. Postdigital Science and Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00530-z
- Knudson, D. (2014) Characteristics of English-language traditional and open access kinesiology and sport journals. Medicina Sportiva, 18(4): 179–184. https://doi.org/10.5604/17342260.1133109
- Knudson, D. (2015a) Influential kinesiology journals: The view from outside of the field. The Physical Educator, 72(1): 149-159. https://js.sagamorepub.com/index.php/pe/article/view/3199
- Knudson, D. (2015b) Evidence of citation bias in kinesiology-related journals. Chronicle of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 26(1): 5–12.
- Knudson, D. (2020a) Top cited research over fifteen years in Sports Biomechanics. Sports Biomechanics, 19(6): 808-816. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2018.1518478
- Knudson, D. (2020b) Bibliometrics of ITF Coaching and Sport Science Review. ITF Coaching and Sport Science Review, 82(28): 21–23.
- Knudson, D. (2022). What kinesiology research is most visible to the academic world. Quest, 74(3), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2022.2092880
- Knudson, D. (2023a) Kinesiology Review’s scholarly influence: An audit of its first decade. Kinesiology Review, 12(3): 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2023-0014
- Knudson, D. (2023b) Influence of 1986-2020 ARCAA articles in sports coaching science. Applied Research in Coaching and Athletics Annual, 38, 1–18.
- Knudson, D. (2023c) Top Google Scholar citations to kinesiology-related terms. International Journal of Kinesiology in Higher Education, 7(2): 122-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/24711616.2022.2111284
- Knudson, D. (2024a) Influential literature in tennis medicine and science. ITF Coaching & Sport Science Review, 32(92): 24–29. https://doi.org/.10.52383/itfcoaching.v33i92.489
- Knudson, D. (2024b) Are there meaningful prestige estimates of kinesiology-related journals? Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 28(4): 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2024.2341849
- Knudson, D. V., & Burson, G. K. (2024) Influence of the International Journal of Exercise Science. International Journal of Exercise Science, 17(2): 265–273.
- Knudson, D., Cardinal, B., & McCullagh, P. (2024) Synthesis of publication metrics in kinesiology-related journals: Proxies for rigor, usage, and prestige. Quest, 76(1): 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2023.2237150
- Knudson, D., &, Myers, N. L. (2021) A bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Medicine and Science in Tennis. Journal of Medicine and Science in Tennis, 26(1): 15–21.
- Langham-Putrow, A., Bakker, C.,& Reigelman, A. (2021) Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles. PLoS ONE, 16(6): e0253129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253129
- Leydesdorff, L. (2009) How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7): 1327–1336. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21024
- Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2011). Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2133–2146. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21609
- Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Comins, J. A., & Milojevic, S. (2016) Citations: Indicators of quality? The impact fallacy. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 1: Ar1. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2016.00001
- Martin-Martin, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & Lopez-Cozar, E. D. (2021). Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126, 871-906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4
- Murali, N. S., Murali, H. R., Auethavekiat, P., Erwin, P. J., Mandrekar, J. N., Manek, N. J., & Ghoush, A. K. (2004) Impact of FUTON and NAA bias on visibility of research. Mayo Clinics Proceedings, 79(8): 1001–1006. https://doi.org/10.4065/79.8.1001
- Nicolaisen, J., & Frandsen, T. F. (2019) Zero impact: A large-scale study of uncitedness. Scientometrics, 119, 1227–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03064-5
- Priem, J., Piwowar, H., & Orr, R. (2022). OpenAlex: A fully open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.01833
- Saraudecha, C., Thungfai, D. N., Phasom, C., Sunta-in, S., Metha, A., Punyaphet, P., . . . Koonrungsesomboon, N. (2023). Hybrid gold open access citation advantage in medicine: Analysis of hybrid journals in the Web of Science. Publications, 11, Ar. 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11020021
- Stern, R. E. (1990). Uncitedness in the biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(3), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199004)41:3%3C193::AID-ASI5%3E3.0.CO;2-B
- Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2013). Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison. Scientometrics, 96(3), 699–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0913-4
- Waris, A., Ahmad, S., Abdel-Magid, I. M., & Hussain, A. (2017). Comparison among journal quality indicators of sports science journals. Library Herald, 55(3), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-2469.2017.00032.X
- Zhou, Y. B., Lu, L., & Li, M. (2012) Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: Distinguishing between prestige and popularity. New Journal of Physics, 14(3), 033033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/3/033033
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2025-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2080-2234
Language: English
Page range: 90 - 97
Submitted on: Jan 27, 2025
Accepted on: Mar 3, 2025
Published on: Apr 18, 2025
Published by: University of Physical Education in Warsaw
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2025 Duane Knudson, published by University of Physical Education in Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.