References
- Boelens, Ruth–Bram De Wever–Michiel Voet. 2017. Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review 22: 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001.10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
- Boelens, Ruth–Michiel Voet–Bram De Wever. 2018. The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning. Computers and Education 120: 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.009.10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.009
- Bruggeman, Bram–Jo Tondeur–Katrien Struyven–Bram Pynoo–Anja Garone–Silke Vanslambrouck. 2021. Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 48: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772.10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772
- Bueno-Alastuey, Maria Camino–Maria Victoria López-Pérez. 2014. Evaluation of a blended learning language course: Students’ perceptions of appropriateness for the development of skills and language areas. Computer Assisted Language Learning 27(6): 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.770037.10.1080/09588221.2013.770037
- Buran, Anna–Arina Evseeva. 2015. Prospects of blended learning implementation at Technical University. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 206: 177–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.049.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.049
- Castaño Muñoz, Jonatan–Christine Redecker–Riina Vuorikari–Yves Punie. 2013. Open Education 2030: Planning the future of adult learning in Europe. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning 28(3): 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.871199.10.1080/02680513.2013.871199
- Chvala, Lynell. 2020. Teacher ideologies of English in 21st century Norway and new directions for locally tailored ELT. System 94: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102327.10.1016/j.system.2020.102327
- Clark, Ruth Colvin. 2020. Four architectures of instruction. Performance Improvement 39(10): 31–38. DOI: 10.1002/PFI.4140391011.10.1002/pfi.4140391011
- Cocquyt, Céline–Chang Zhu–Anh Nguyet Diep–Maurice De Greef–Tom Vanwing. 2019. Examining the role of learning support in blended learning for adults’ social inclusion and social capital. Computers and Education 142: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103610.10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103610
- Erben, Tony–Ruth Ban–Martha Castañeda. 2009. Teaching English Language Learners through Technology. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203894422
- Fandiño, Fredy Geovanni Escobar–Angela Juliette Silva Velandia. 2020. How an online tutor motivates e-learning English. Heliyon 6: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04630.10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04630
- Hampel, Regine. 2006. Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL 18(1): 105–121. DOI: 10.1017/S0958344006000711.10.1017/S0958344006000711
- Jia, Jiyou–Yuhao Chen–Zhuhui Ding–Meixian Ruan. 2012. Effects of a vocabulary acquisition and assessment system on students’ performance in a blended learning class for English subject. Computers and Education 58: 63–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.002.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.002
- Kaya, Haldun. 2015. Blending technology with constructivism: Implications for an ELT classroom. Teaching English with Technology 15(1): 3–13.
- Klimova, Blanka Frydrychova–Jaroslav Kacetl. 2015. Hybrid learning and its current role in the teaching of foreign languages. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 182: 477–481. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.830.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.830
- Krajcso, Zita–Ulrike Frimmel. 2017. Retrieving online language learning resources: Classification and quality. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(1): 11–22. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050102.10.13189/ujer.2017.050102
- Lackman, Ken. 2010. Teaching Speaking Sub-Skills: Activities for Improving Speaking. Ken Lackman and Associates. http://www.kenlackman.com/files/speakingsubskillshandout13poland_2_.pdf (Last accessed: 21 March 2021).
- Lai, Chun–Li. Guofang 2011. Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review. CALICO Journal 28(2): 498–521.10.11139/cj.28.2.498-521
- Li, Jie. 2020. Development and validation of second language online reading strategies inventory. Computers and Education 145: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103733.10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103733
- Lu, Fang-Chen–Ben Chang. 2016. Role-play game-enhanced English for a specific-purpose vocabulary-acquisition framework. Educational Technology & Society 19(2): 367–377. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.2.367 (Last accessed: 21 March 2021).
- Luka, Ineta (ed.). 2018. B1/B2 English Language Course Curriculum. http://e-culture.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/B1_B2_English_curriculum.pdf (Last accessed: 27 March 2021).
- Luka, Ineta (ed.). 2019. Design thinking in pedagogy: Frameworks and uses. European Journal of Education 54(4): 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12367.10.1111/ejed.12367
- Lungu, Iuliana. 2013. The increasing need for blended-learning models in courses of English for specific courses in Romanian Universities. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 76: 470–475. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.148.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.148
- MacIntyre, Peter–Tammy Gregersen–Sarah Mercer. 2020. Language teachers’ coping strategies during the COVID-19 conversion to online teaching: Correlations with stress, wellbeing and negative emotions. System 94: 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102352.10.1016/j.system.2020.102352
- Masuram, Jyothi–Pushpa Nagini Sripada. 2020. Developing speaking skills through task-based materials. Procedia Computer Science 172: 60–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.009.10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.009
- Matukhin, Dmitry–Elena Zhitkova. 2015. Implementing blended learning technology in higher professional education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 206: 183–188. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.051.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.051
- Maulan, Sumarni Maulan–Ibrahim Raihan. 2012. The teaching and learning of English for academic purposes in blended learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 67: 561–570. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.361.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.361
- McNaught, Carmel–Paul Lam–Kin Fai Cheng. 2012. Investigating relationships between features of learning designs and student learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development 60(2): 271–286. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-011-9226-1.10.1007/s11423-011-9226-1
- Meskill, Carla–Natasha Anthony. 2015. Teaching Languages Online. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783093786
- Miyazoe, Terumi–Terry Anderson. 2012. Discuss, reflect, and collaborate: A qualitative analysis of forum, blog, and wiki use in EFL blended learning course. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 34: 146–152. DOI: 10.1016/j. sbspro.2012.02.030.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.030
- Moser, Kelly M.–Tianlan Wei–Devon Brenner. 2021. Remote teaching during COVID-19: Implications from a national survey of language educators. System 97: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102431.10.1016/j.system.2020.102431
- Nagy, Imola Katalin. 2019. In between language teaching methods: Do we need (to know about) methods at all? Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 11(3): 119–139. DOI: 10.2478/ausp-2019-0030.10.2478/ausp-2019-0030
- O’Hanlon, Fiona. 2019. Mixed-methods research: Achieving a robust design. In Lorna Hamilton–John Ravenscroft (eds), Building Research Design in Education, 107–131. London: Bloomsbury Academy.10.5040/9781350019539.ch-007
- Ou Yang, Fang-Chuan–Vivian Wu Wen-Chi. 2015. Using mixed-modality learning strategies via e-learning for second language vocabulary acquisition. Educational Technology and Society 18(3): 309–322. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.3.309?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents (Last accessed: 21 March 2021).
- Rasheed, Abubakar Rasheed–Amirrudin Kamsin–Abdullah Nor Aniza. 2020. Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers and Education 144: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701.10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
- Saeed, Nauman–Yun Yang–Suku Sinnappan. 2009. Emerging web technologies in higher education: A case of incorporating blogs, podcasts and social bookmarks in a web programming course based on students’ learning style as and technology preferences. Educational Technology and Society 12(4): 98–1094.
- Samuda, Virginia–Martin Bygate. 2008. Tasks in Second Language Learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230596429
- Sántha-Malomsoki, Ágnes–Kálmán Sántha. 2019. Students’ beliefs on classroom didactics of second language teaching in the 21st century. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica 11(2): 85–101. DOI: 10.2478/ausp-2019-0014.10.2478/ausp-2019-0014
- Schmitt, Norbert. 2000. Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Shishkovskaya, Julia–Dina Bakalo–Artem Grigoryev. 2015. EFL teaching in the e-learning environment: Updated principles and methods. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 205: 199–204. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.007.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.007
- Yalçinkaya, Deniz. 2015. Why is blended learning for vocationally oriented language teaching? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 174: 1061–1068. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.795.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.795
- Yip, Florence W. M.–Alvin C. M. Kwan. 2006. Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and learning English vocabulary. Educational Media International 43(3): 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980600641445.10.1080/09523980600641445