Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mitigating Devices within the Context of Two-Way Mediated Shop Conversations Cover

Mitigating Devices within the Context of Two-Way Mediated Shop Conversations

By: Igor Ivanović  
Open Access
|Nov 2020

References

  1. Agar, M., 1983. Institutional discourse. Text 5(3): 147–168.10.1515/text.1.1985.5.3.147
  2. Brown, P.–Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085
  3. Channell, J. 1990. Precise and vague quantities in writings on economics. In: The writing scholar. Newbury Park: Sage. 95–117.
  4. Cheepen, C. 2000. Small talk in service dialogs: The conversational aspects of transactional telephone talk. In: Small talk. London: Longman. 288–311.10.4324/9781315838328-16
  5. Drew, P.–Heritage, J. 1992. Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In: Drew, P.– Heritage, J. (eds.), Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3–65.
  6. Drew, P.–Sorjonen, M.-L. 1997. Institutional dialogue. In: van Dijk, T. (ed.), Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction. London: Sage. 92–118.
  7. Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
  8. Grainger, K.–Mills, S. 2016. Theoretical perspectives on indirectness. In: Directness and indirectness across cultures. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137340399
  9. Hyland, K. 2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics 113: 16–29.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
  10. Jucker, A. H.–Smith, S. W.–Ludge, T. 2003. Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1737–1769.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00188-1
  11. Koester, A. 2010. Workplace discourse. London–New York: Continuum.
  12. Lakoff, G. 1972. Hedges, a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. 183–228.
  13. Lamerichs, J.–te Molder, H. 2011. Reflecting on your own talk: The discursive action method at work. Applied conversation analysis. Palgrave advances in linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 184–206.10.1057/9780230316874_10
  14. Markkanen, R.–Schroder, H. 1997. Hedging: A challenge for pragmatics and discourse analysis. In: Markkanen, R.–Schroder, H. (eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 3–20.10.1515/9783110807332.3
  15. Maynard, D.–Schaeffer, N.–Freese, J. 2011. Improving response rates in telephone interviews. Applied conversation analysis. Palgrave advances in linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 54–74.10.1057/9780230316874_4
  16. O’Keeffe, A. 2006. Investigating media discourse. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203015704
  17. Paul Gee, J. 2017. Introducing discourse analysis – From grammar to society. Abingdon: Routledge.
  18. Preisler, B. 1986. Linguistic sex roles in conversation: Social variation in the expression of tentativeness in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110862973
  19. Strauss, S.–Parastou, F. 2014. Discourse analysis – Putting our worlds into words. Abingdon: Routledge.
  20. https://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia/Audio/Audio-Players/SoundScriber.shtml (downloaded on: 07.15.2020).
Language: English, German
Page range: 105 - 119
Published on: Nov 24, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2020 Igor Ivanović, published by Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.