Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of TCP SIAD and TCP BBR Congestion Control in Simulated 5G Networks Cover

Comparison of TCP SIAD and TCP BBR Congestion Control in Simulated 5G Networks

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. [1] Cardwell, N., Cheng, Y., Stephen Gunn, C., Yeganeh, S. H., and Jacobson, V., “BBR: Congestion-Based Congestion Control”, Communications of the ACM 60.2, 2017, pp. 58–66.10.1145/3009824
  2. [2] Hock, M., Bless, R., and Zitterbart, M., “Experimental Evaluation of BBR Congestion Control”, IEEE 25th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP). IEEE, 2017.10.1109/ICNP.2017.8117540
  3. [3] Feng, L., Chung, J. W., Jiang, X., and Claypool, M., “TCP CUBIC Versus BBR on the Highway”, International Conference on Passive and Active Network Measurement. Springer, Cham, 2018.
  4. [4] Kühlewind, M., “TCP SIAD: Congestion Control Supporting High Speed and Low Latency”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.07947, 2016.
  5. [5] Ren, Y., Yang, W., Zhou, X., Chen, H., Liu, B., “A Survey on TCP Over mmWave.”, Computer Communications, 2021.10.1016/j.comcom.2021.01.032
  6. [6] Zhang, M., Polese, M., Mezzavilla, M., Zhu, J., Rangan, S., Panwar, S., Zorzi, M., “Will TCP Work in mmWave 5G Cellular Networks?”, IEEE Communications Magazine 57.1, pp. 65–71, 2019.10.1109/MCOM.2018.1701370
  7. [7] Hayes, D. A., Ros, D., and Alay, Ö., “On the Importance of TCP Splitting Proxies for Future 5G mmWave Communications”, IEEE 44th LCN Symposium on Emerging Topics in Networking (LCN Symposium, IEEE, 2019.10.1109/LCNSymposium47956.2019.9000661
  8. [8] Pieska, M., and Kassler, A., “TCP Performance over 5G mmWave Links—Tradeoff Between Capacity and Latency”, IEEE 13th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), IEEE, 2017.10.1109/WiMOB.2017.8115776
  9. [9] Poorzare, R., and Calveras Augé, A., “How Sufficient is TCP When Deployed in 5G mmWave Networks Over the Urban Deployment?”, IEEE Access 9, 2021, 36342–36355.10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3063623
  10. [10] Mateo, P. J., Fiandrino, C., and Widmer, J., “Analysis of TCP Performance in 5G mm-wave Mobile Networks.”, ICC IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, 2019.10.1109/ICC.2019.8761718
  11. [11] Srivastava, A., Fund, F., and Panwar, S. S., “An Experimental Evaluation of Low Latency Congestion Control for mmwave Links”, IEEE INFOCOM Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), IEEE, 2020.10.1109/INFOCOMWKSHPS50562.2020.9162881
  12. [12] https://www.nsnam.org/ [Online, last checked: 2021.11.18]
  13. [13] Mezzavilla, M., Zhang, M., Polese, M., Ford, R., Dutta, S., Rangan, S., Zorzi, M., “End-to-End Simulation of 5G mmWave Networks,” in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2237–2263, 2018.10.1109/COMST.2018.2828880
  14. [14] https://github.com/dscharnitzky/mmwave-siad-bbr [Online, last checked: 2021.11.18]
  15. [15] http://mirja.kuehlewind.net/src/tcp_siad.c [Online, last checked: 2021.11.18]
  16. [16] https://www.nsnam.org/docs/release/3.35/doxygen/classns3_1_1_tcp_congestion_ops.html [Online, last checked: 2021.11.18]
Language: English
Page range: 114 - 124
Submitted on: Nov 19, 2021
|
Accepted on: Dec 6, 2021
|
Published on: Dec 30, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Donát Scharnitzky, Zsolt Krämer, Sándor Molnár, published by Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.