Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ownership Structure and the Risk: Analysis of Indian Firms Cover
By:  and    
Open Access
|Oct 2020

References

  1. Amihud, Y.; Kamin, J. Y.; Ronen, J. (1983). ‘Managerialism’, ‘ownerism’ and risk. Journal of Banking & Finance 7(2): 189–196.10.1016/0378-4266(83)90031-6
  2. Amihud, Y.; Lev, B. (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. The Bell Journal of Economics 12(2): 605–617.10.2307/3003575
  3. Anderson, R.; Reeb, D. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance 58: 1301–1327.10.1111/1540-6261.00567
  4. Arellano, M. (1987). Practitioners’ corner: Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 49(4): 431–434.10.1111/j.1468-0084.1987.mp49004006.x
  5. Berle, A.; Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: McMillan.
  6. Boubakri, N.; El Ghoul, S.; Guedhami, O.; Megginson, W. L. (2018). The market value of government ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance 50: 44–65.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.026
  7. Breusch, T. S.; Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies 47(1): 239–253.10.2307/2297111
  8. Chen, C. R.; Steiner, T. L., Whyte, A. M. (1998). Risk-taking behavior and management ownership in depository institutions. Journal of Financial Research 21(1): 1–16.
  9. Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics 87(1): 157–176.10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.006
  10. Damodaran, A. (2006). Damodaran on valuation, security analysis for investment and corporate finance. USA: John Willey & Son. Inc.
  11. Demsetz, H.; Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93(6): 1155–1177.10.1086/261354
  12. Ghysels, E.; Santa-Clara, P.; Valkanov, R. (2005). There is a risk-return trade-off after all. Journal of Financial Economics 76(3): 509–548.10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.03.008
  13. Gupta, N. (2005). Partial privatization and firm performance. The Journal of Finance 60(2): 987–1015.10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00753.x
  14. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 46(6): 1251–1271.10.2307/1913827
  15. Hawawini, G.; Subramanian, V.; Verdin, P. (2003). Is performance driven by industry-or firm-specific factors? A new look at the evidence. Strategic Management Journal 24(1): 1–16.10.1002/smj.278
  16. Jensen, M. C.; W. H. Meckling (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  17. Jiraporn, P.; Chatjuthamard, P.; Tong, S.; Kim, Y. S. (2015). Does corporate governance influence corporate risk-taking? Evidence from the Institutional Shareholders Services (ISS). Finance Research Letters 13: 105–112.10.1016/j.frl.2015.02.007
  18. John, K.; Litov, L.; Yeung, B. (2008). Corporate governance and risk-taking. The Journal of finance 63(4): 1679–1728.10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01372.x
  19. Kakani, R. K.; Saha, B.; Reddy, V. N. (2001). Determinants of financial performance of Indian corporate sector in the post-liberalization era: An exploratory study. NSE Research Initiative, Paper No. 5.10.2139/ssrn.904983
  20. Khanna, T.; Palepu, K. (2000a). Emerging market business groups, foreign intermediaries, and corporate governance. In: Morck, Randall K. (ed.), Concentrated corporate ownership. University of Chicago Press. 265–294.10.3386/w6955
  21. (2000b). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. The Journal of Finance 55(2): 867–891.10.1111/0022-1082.00229
  22. (2005). The evolution of concentrated ownership in India: Broad patterns and a history of the Indian software industry. In: Morck, Randall K. (ed.), A history of corporate governance around the world: Family business groups to professional managers. University of Chicago Press. 283–324.
  23. Lins, K. V. (2003). Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38(1): 159–184.10.2307/4126768
  24. Low, A. (2009). Managerial risk-taking behavior and equity-based compensation. Journal of Financial Economics 92: 470–490.10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.05.004
  25. Mandelker, G. N.; Rhee, S. G. (1984). The impact of the degrees of operating and financial leverage on systematic risk of common stock. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 19(1): 45–57.10.2307/2331000
  26. Maury, B. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance 12: 321–341.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.02.002
  27. McConnell, J. J.; Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27(2): 595–612.10.1016/0304-405X(90)90069-C
  28. McEachern, W. A. (1976). Corporate control and risk. Economic Inquiry 14(2): 270–278.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00393.x
  29. Millo, G. (2017). Robust standard error estimators for panel models: A unifying approach. Journal of Statistical Software 82: 1–27.10.18637/jss.v082.i03
  30. Monsen, J.; Downs, A. (1965). A theory of large managerial firms. Journal of Political Economy 73: 221–236.10.1086/259012
  31. Morck, R.; Nakamura, M.; Shivdasani, A. (2000). Banks, ownership structure, and firm value in Japan. The Journal of Business 73(4): 539–567.10.1086/209654
  32. Nguyen, P. (2011). Corporate governance and risk-taking: Evidence from Japanese firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 19(3): 278–297.10.1016/j.pacfin.2010.12.002
  33. Patibandla, M. (2006). Equity pattern, corporate governance and performance: A study of India’s corporate sector. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 59(1): 29–44.10.1016/j.jebo.2004.04.004
  34. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. University of Cambridge, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 435.10.2139/ssrn.572504
  35. Radice, H. K. (1971). Control type, profitability and growth in large firms: An empirical study. The Economic Journal 81(323): 547–562.10.2307/2229848
  36. Sahu, A. K. (2015). Does institutional shareholding affect firm value? An empirical analysis in Indian market. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2413074. (Last accessed on: 9 June 2015).
  37. Saito, T. (2008). Family firms and firm performance: Evidence from Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 22: 620–646.10.1016/j.jjie.2008.06.001
  38. Stano, M. (1976). Monopoly power, ownership control, and corporate performance. The Bell Journal of Economics 7(2): 672–679.10.2307/3003279
  39. Stephen, R. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of Economic Theory 13(3): 341–360.10.1016/0022-0531(76)90046-6
  40. Thomsen, S.; Pedersen, T. (1996). Nationality and ownership structures: The 100 largest companies in six European nations. MIR: Management International Review 36(2): 149–166.
  41. Varma, J. R. (1997). Corporate governance in India: Disciplining the dominant shareholder. IIMB Management Review 9(4): 5–18.
  42. Villalonga, B.; Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics 80(2): 385–417.10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
  43. Villalonga, B.; Amit, R. (2010). Family control of firms and industries. Financial Management 39(3): 863–904.10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01098.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/auseb-2020-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2360-0047 (formerly 2343-8894)
Language: English
Page range: 39 - 52
Published online: Oct 14, 2020
Published in print: Oct 1, 2020
Published by: Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
JEL:

© 2020 Ranjita Kumari, Nishant Kumar, published by Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.