Digital Naïves Go Online

Rozália Klára Bakó

doi:10.2478/auscom-2019-0007

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Digital Naïves Go Online

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communicatio

Volume 6 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019)

By: Rozália Klára Bakó

Open Access

|Feb 2020

Read online

Abstract

We live in a networked world with a fast pace of digitalization, and yet about half of the humanity is still offline (United Nations, 2018). Information and communication technologies are playing a key role in our public and private lives, both during work- and playtime. No wonder that social inequalities are increasingly reflected as digital inequalities in terms of infrastructural access, skills, and cultural practices online: those left behind can hardly keep up. The present research note brings together theoretical and practical resources related to digital inclusion issues globally, with local examples from Romania, where digital naïves – the poor, the rural, the elderly, the disabled, and the less educated – are more at risk.¹

Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities. London–New York: Verso.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ANCOM (Autoritatea Naţională pentru Administrare şi Reglementare în Comunicaţii). (2019). Piaţa serviciilor de comunicaţii electronice din România. Raport de date statistice – semestrul II 2018. ---lt---www.ancom.org.ro---gt--- (accessed on: 3 November 2019).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bakó, R. K. (2016). Romania: Participatory Culture and the Internet. Global Information Society Watch 2016. Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Internet, 189–193.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bauerlein, M. (ed.), 2011. The Digital Divide. London–New York: Penguin Group. Kindle Edition.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks. How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven–London: Yale University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bock, A.–Macgilchrist, F. (2019). Mobile Media Practices of Young People in «Safely Digital», «Enthusiastically Digital», and «Postdigital» Schools. MedienPädagogik 35: 136–156 ---lt---https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/35/2019.10.23.X.---gt--- (accessed on: 3 November 2019).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
boyd, d. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven–London: Yale University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cardoso, G. (2006). The Media in the Network Society: Browsing, News, Filters and Citizenship. Lisbon: Centre for Research and Studies in Sociology.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Castells, M. (1999). Toward a Sociology of the Network Society. Contemporary Sociology 29(5): 693–699. (ed.). (2004). The Network Society: A Cross-cultural Perspective. Cheltenham, UK–Northampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781845421663
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
European Commission. (2019a). Digital Economy and Society Index, 2019 ---lt---https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi---gt--- (accessed on: 3 November 2019). (2019b). Digital Economy and Society Index, 2019. Finland ---lt---https://ec.europaeu/digital-single-market/en/scoreboard/finland. ---gt--- (accessed on: 3 November 2019).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
(2019c). Digital Economy and Society Index, 2019. Romania ---lt---https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/scoreboard/romania---gt--- (accessed on: 3 November 2019).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Helsper, E. (2008). Digital Inclusion: An Analysis of Social Disadvantage and the Information Society. London: London School of Economics.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Herian, R. (2019). Tokens of Technical Progress: Blockchains, Data Dysphoria ---amp--- Fantasies of Control. The World Financial Review September–October: 66–69.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21^st Century. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Meneses, J.–Mominó, J. M. (2010). Putting Digital Literacy in Practice: How Schools Contribute to Digital Inclusion in the Network Society. The Information Society 26: 197–208.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rainie, L.–Wellman, B. (2014). Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. London–New York–Toronto: Penguin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thomas, J.–Barraket, J.–Wilson, C. K.–Rennie, E.–Ewing, S.–MacDonald, T. (2019). Measuring Australia’s Digital Divide: The Australian Digital Inclusion Index 2019. Melbourne: RMIT University and Swinburne University of Technology, for Telstra.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tőkés, G.–Velicu, A. (2015). “I Learned All by Myself”: Romanian Young People’s Self-Perception of Their Digital Competence. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communicatio 2: 67–91.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
United Nations, 2018. United Nations e-Government Survey 2018. Gearing e-Government to Support Transformation towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Deursen, A.–Helsper, E. (2015). The Third Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online? Communication and Information Technologies Annual: Digital Distinctions and Inequalities. Studies in Media and Communications 10: 29–53.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Deursen, A.–Van Dijk, J. (2010). Internet Skills and the Digital Divide. New Media and Society XX(X): 1–19.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Dijk, J. (2006). The Network Society. London–Thousand Oaks–New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wellman, B. (2001). Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism. Kyoto Workshop on Digital Cities 2001. Digital Cities II: Computational and Sociological Approaches, 10–25. (ed.). 2018. Networks in the Global Village. Life in Contemporary Communities. New York–London: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wellman, B.–Quan-Haase, A.–Boase, J.–Chen, W.–Hampton, K.–Díaz, I.– Miyata, K. (2003). The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 8(3) ---lt---https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x---gt---.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Westera, W. (2013). The Digital Turn: How the Internet Transforms Our Existence. Bloomington: Author House (accessed on: 3 November 2019).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/auscom-2019-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2537-2793

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 121 - 129

Published online: Feb 7, 2020

Published in print: Dec 1, 2019

Published by: Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

Keywords:

Related subjects:

Genres and media in cultural studies,

Digital media and communication,

Social sciences,

Communication science,

Communication theory,

Mass communication,

Public and political communication

© 2020 Rozália Klára Bakó, published by Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 6 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019)