Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Urban Biomimicry Typologies: Ways of Learning from Nature and Locality Cover

Urban Biomimicry Typologies: Ways of Learning from Nature and Locality

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Etxeberria, A. M., Genua, E. G. From ecological architecture to biomimicry. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2017, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 68–74. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.20.3.19295
  2. Blanco, E., Pedersen Zari, M., Raskin, K., & Clergeau, P. Urban ecosystem-level biomimicry and regenerative design: Linking ecosystem functioning and urban built environments. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, no. 1, article no. 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010404
  3. Dicks, H., Bertrand-Krajewski, J. L., Ménézo, C., Rahbé, Y., Pierron, J. P., & Harpet, C. Applying biomimicry to cities: the forest as model for urban planning and design. In Nagenborg, M., Stone, T., González, M. W., Vermaas, P. E. Technology and the City: Towards a Philosophy of Urban Technologies. Cham: Springer-Verlag, 2021, pp. 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52313-8_14
  4. Di Carlo, I., Papeschi, A. Towards a pervasive affectual urbanism: interspecies encounters and performative assemblages of contamination. Prospectives, no. 3, 2022, pp. 1–10 [online, cited 23.04.2025]. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10183013/
  5. Di Carlo, I. The aesthetics of sustainability. Systemic thinking and self-organization in the evolution of cities, WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 2016, vol. 191, no.12, pp. 27–38. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC140031
  6. Adams, Sh. Is biodesign the future of architecture? EcoLogicStudio thinks so. Wallpaper, 2025 [online, cited 23.04.2025]. https://www.wallpaper.com/design-interiors/design-events/stonex-partners-with-wallpaper
  7. Zaleckis, K., Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė, I., Viliūnas, G. Mathematical graph-based urban simulations as a tool for biomimicry urbanism? Evolutionary studies in imaginative culture (ESIC), 2024, vol. 8.2, no. S1, pp. 153–183. https://doi.org/10.70082/esiculture.vi.803
  8. Parker, M. C., Jeynes, C. Maximum entropy (most likely) double helical and double logarithmic spiral trajectories in space-time. Scientific Reports, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, article no. 10779. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46765-w
  9. Allen, Ch., Arhon, Z., Miller, N. From sustainability to regeneration: The power of biomimicry in transforming the built environment, 2023 [online, cited 23.04.2025]. https://www.jacobs.com/reports/infrastructure/biomimicry-sustainability-regeneration.
  10. EcoLogic Studio. Deep Green Urbansphere, 2025 [online, cited 23.04.2025]. https://www.ecologicstudio.com/projects/deep-green-urbansphere-venice
  11. Othmani, N. I., Yunos, M. Y. M., Ismail, N. A., Rahman, K. A. A. A. Review on biomimicry levels. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research AJHSSR, 2018, no. 2, pp. 55–58.
  12. Stevens, L., De Vries, M. M., Bos, M. M., Kopnina, H. Biomimicry design education essentials. In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 2019, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 459–468
  13. Marshall, A., Lozeva, S. Questioning the theory and practice of biomimicry. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 2009, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V4-N1-1-10
  14. Gerola, A., Robaey, Z., Blok, V. What does it mean to mimic nature? A typology for biomimetic design. Philosophy & Technology, 2023, vol. 36, no. 4, p. 65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00665-0
  15. Cohen, Y. H., Reich, Y. Biomimetic design method for innovation and sustainability. Berlin, Germany, Springer, 2016. 254 p.
  16. Pedersen Zari, M., Connolly, P., Southcombe, M. Ecologies design: Transforming architecture, landscape, and urbanism. Routledge, 2020. 320 p.
  17. Hashemi Farzaneh, H., Helms, M. K., Muenzberg, C., Lindemann, U. Technology-pull and biology-push approaches in bio-inspired design - comparing results from empirical studies on student teams. In DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference, 2016, pp. 231–240.
  18. Batty, M., Marshall, S. Thinking organic, acting civic: The paradox of planning for Cities in Evolution. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017, vol. 166, pp. 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.002
  19. Tousi, E., Sinou, M., Perouli, A. Urban acupuncture as a method of open space regeneration in Greek ex-refugee areas. The case of Nikea, Piraeus. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2022, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 5–18. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.30.1.29423
  20. Di Carlo, I. The aesthetic of sustainability: systemic thinking in the evolution of cities. The Sustainable City IX, 2014, vol. 1, pp. 27–38. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC140031
  21. Barragan C. Biomimetic urban design. 2024 [online, cited 23.04.2025]. https://urbandesignlab.in/biomimetic-urban-design/?srsltid=AfmBOorpKzGcWDwW1cDnozKCytY_L60p7rh3jYYcrhI0EnEuAKagBhgk
  22. Lumini, M. The Maniola, Lycaenidae, and other Lepidoptera eggs as an inspiration source for food storage and packaging design solutions. Bionics and Sustainable Design, 2022, pp. 45–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1812-4_3
  23. Benyus, J. A good place to settle: Biomimicry, biophilia, and the return of nature’s inspiration to architecture. Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life, 2008, pp. 38–40.
  24. Xing, Y., Brewer, M., El-Gharabawy, H., Griffith, G., Jones, P. Growing and testing mycelium bricks as building insulation materials. In IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science, 2018, vol. 121, article no. 022032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/121/2/022032
  25. Benyus, J. Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature. Harper Collins, 2002. 308 p.
  26. Blok, V., Gremmen, B. Ecological innovation: biomimicry as a new way of thinking and acting ecologically. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 2016, vol. 29, pp. 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1
  27. MacKinnon, R. B., Oomen, J., Pedersen Zari, M. Promises and presuppositions of biomimicry. Biomimetics, 2020, vol. 5, no. 3, article no. 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics5030033
  28. Mathews, F. Biomimicry and the problem of praxis. Environmental Values, 2019, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 573–600. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327119X15579936382400
  29. Eid, M. A. H., AlAbdallah, G. Sustainable development through biomimicry: Enhancing circular economy practices for environmental sustainability. Sustainable Development, 2024, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 6045–6056. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3010
  30. Braungart, M., McDonough, M. Cradle to cradle: Re-making the way we make things. Reprint, London: Vintage, 2002. 208 p.
  31. Heerwagen, J. Biophilia, health, and well-being. In Campbell, L., Wiesen, A. Restorative commons: Creating health and well-being through urban landscapes, 2011, vol. 39, pp. 39–57.
  32. Pasquero, C., Poletto, M. Deep Green. topos, 2020, vol. 112, pp. 24–30. https://toposmagazine.com/deep-green/
  33. Wang, X., Pasquero, C. Ecological thinking in regenerative architecture: Relevance of abduction in ecoLogic Studio’s Deep Green research project. Journal of Chinese Architecture and Urbanism, 2024, vol. 6, no. 1, article no. 1084. https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.1084
  34. Wissmach, E. A., Ninesling, M., Weaver, R. Biomimicry of natural reef hydrodynamics in an artificial spur and groove reef formation. In Coastal Engineering Proceedings, 2023, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v37.papers.3
  35. Soriano, M. A., Herath, S. Quantifying the role of traditional rice terraces in regulating water resources: Implications for management and conservation efforts. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 2018, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 885–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2018.1437497
  36. Arbabzadeh, M., Etessam, I., Shemirani, M. M. Passive thermoregulation in vernacular and biomimetic architecture in hot and arid climate. International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning, 2020, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 198–211.
  37. Cvetković D. Development of biomimetic architecture, 2024 [online, cited 23.04.2025]. https://howtorhino.com/blog/architecture-styles/biomimetic-architecture/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  38. Yang, G., Zhou, W., Qu, W., Yao, W., Zhu, P., Xu, J. A review of ant nests and their implications for architecture. Buildings, 2022, vol. 12, no. 12, article no. 2225. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12122225
  39. Hamilton, E. M., Shields, R. If green walls could talk: Interpreting building sustainability through atmospheric cues. Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, no. 9, article no. 3890. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17093890
  40. Elakhya N. Biomimicry – better ideas inspired by nature. Ecoideaz, 2016 [online, cited 23.04.2025]. https://ecoideaz.com/innovative-green-ideas/biomimicry-better-ideas-inspired-nature/
  41. How does biomimicry impact daily human activities? Lifestyle Sustainability Directory, 2025 [online, cited 20.06.2025]. https://lifestyle.sustainability-directory.com/question/how-does-biomimicry-impact-daily-human-activities/
  42. Sullivan, M. K., Browne, L., Penagos Zuluaga, J. C., Liu, J., Surendra, A., EstradaVillegas, S. Sacred forest biodiversity conservation: A meta‐analysis. Conservation Science and Practice, 2024, vol. 6, no. 1, article no. 13055. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13055
  43. Guattari, F. The three ecologies. The Athlone Press, London, 1987. 174 p.
  44. Hamlet waterfront residential development. Rethinking the Future, 2018 [online, cited 20.06.2025]. https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/acda2018-winners/hamlet-waterfront-residential-development-bh-architects/
  45. White, S. S., Ellis, C. Sustainability, the environment, and New Urbanism: An assessment and agenda for research. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2007, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 125–142. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43030796
  46. Ellis, C. The New Urbanism: critiques and rebuttals. Journal of Urban Design, 2002, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480022000039330
  47. Charter of New Urbanism. Congress for New Urbanism, 2025 [online, cited 01.08.2025]. https://www.cnu.org/who-we-are/charter-new-urbanism
  48. OpenAI. ChatGPT (Feb 2025 version) Large language model, 2025 [online, cited 01.08.2025]. https://chat.openai.com/
  49. Newman, M. E. J. Networks: An introduction. Oxford University Press, 2010. 772 p.
  50. Freeman, L. C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 1977, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 35–4. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543
  51. Barabási, A. L. Network science. Cambridge University Press, 2016. 456 p.
  52. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., Labianca, G. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 2009, vol. 323, no. 5916, pp. 892–895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821
  53. Hillier, B., Hanson, J. The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, 1984.
  54. Krempel, L. Network visualization. Springer, 2011. 110 p.
  55. Diestel, R. Graph theory (5th ed.). Springer, 2017. 447 p.
  56. Watts, D. J., Strogatz, S. H. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 1998, vol. 393, no. 6684, pp. 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918
  57. Explosion, spaCy en_core_web_md model (version 3.7.1) [Data set]. Explosion AI, 2025 [online, cited 01.08.2025]. https://spacy.io/models/en
  58. Hagberg, A., Schult, D., Swart, P. NetworkX (Version 3.5) [Computer software], Python Software Foundation, 2008 [online, cited 01.08.2025]. https://networkx.org/
  59. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks (Version 0.10.1) [Computer software], 2009. https://gephi.org/
  60. Bonacich, P. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1972, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1972.9989806
  61. Harary, F. Graph theory. Addison-Wesley, 1969. 274 p. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7407411M/Graph_ Theory
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2026-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8764 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4333
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 69
Submitted on: Aug 14, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 15, 2026
Published on: Jun 27, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2026 Indrė Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė, Kęstutis Zaleckis, Gediminas Viliūnas, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.