Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Reframing the Campus: A Systematic Scientometric Review of Global Research on University Campus Design Cover

Reframing the Campus: A Systematic Scientometric Review of Global Research on University Campus Design

Open Access
|Dec 2025

References

  1. Sönmezler, K. The urban laboratory of modern architecture: University design [Doctoral dissertation, Mimar Sinan University], 2003.
  2. Kortan, E. Design of contemporary university campuses. Ankara: Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, 1981.
  3. Turner, P. V. Some thoughts on history and campus planning. Planning for Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 3, 1990, pp. 1–28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ372294
  4. Paker, N. Reading on the historical development of the university-campus relationship. Mimarist: Journal of Architecture Culture, vol. 16, no. 1, 2016, pp. 44–49.
  5. Begeç, H. Üniversitelerde Kampus Yerleşme Biçimleri. Yapı Dergisi, vol. 252, 2002, pp. 57–63.
  6. Türeyen, M. N. Yükseköğretim kurumları: Kampüsler. İstanbul: Tasarım Yayın Grubu, 2002.
  7. He, Q., Wang, G., Luo, L., Shi, Q., Xie, J., Meng, X. Mapping the managerial areas of Building Information Modeling (BIM) using scientometric analysis. International journal of project management, vol. 35, no. 4, 2017, pp. 670–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.001
  8. Yalcinkaya, M., Singh, V. Patterns and trends in building information modeling (BIM) research: A latent semantic analysis. Automation in Construction, 59, 2015, pp. 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.012
  9. Heyvaert, M., Hannes, K., Onghena, P. Using mixed methods research synthesis for literature reviews. Sage Publications, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506333243
  10. Harden, A., Thomas, J. Mixed methods and systematic reviews: examples and emerging issues. In: A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (Eds.), Mixed methods and systematic reviews: Examples and emerging issues (2nd ed.,). SAGE Publications, Inc., 2010, pp. 749–774. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n29
  11. Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, 2010, pp. 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  12. Tijssen, R. J. W., Van Raan, A. F. J. Mapping changes in science and technology: Bibliometric co-occurrence analysis of the R&D literature. Evaluation Review, vol. 18, no. 1, 1994, pp. 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9401800110
  13. Cobo, M. J., LópezHerrera, A. G., HerreraViedma, E., Herrera, F. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 62, no. 7, 2011, pp. 1382–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525
  14. van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice, 2014, pp. 285–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
  15. Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., McGuinness, L. A. PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, vol. 18, no. 2, 2022, e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
  16. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. Preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, vol. 6, no. 7, 2009, e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  17. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Moher, D. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, vol. 372, 2021, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
  18. Bao, W. COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, vol. 2, no. 2, 2020, pp. 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
  19. Scheuer, C., Keoleian, G. A., Reppe, P. Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: Modeling challenges and design implications. Energy and Buildings, vol. 35, no. 10, 2003, pp. 1049–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(03)00066-5
  20. Berman, M., Chase, J. S., Landweber, L., Nakao, A., Ott, M., Raychaudhuri, D., Ricci, R., Seskar, I. GENI: A federated testbed for innovative network experiments. Computer Networks, vol. 61, 2014, pp. 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2013.12.037
  21. Middel, A., Häb, K., Brazel, A. J., Martin, C. A., Guhathakurta, S. Impact of urban form and design on mid-afternoon microclimate in Phoenix Local Climate Zones. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 122, 2014, pp. 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.004
  22. Engel, S. P., Stieneker, M., Soltau, N., Rabiee, S., Stagge, H., De Doncker, R. W. Comparison of modular multilevel DC converter and dual-active bridge converter for power conversion in HVDC and MVDC grids. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 30, no. 1, Jan. 2015, pp. 124-137. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2014.2310656
  23. Blocken, B., Janssen, W. D., van Hooff, T. CFD simulation for pedestrian wind comfort and wind safety in urban areas: General decision framework and case study for the Eindhoven University campus. Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 30, 2012, pp. 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.009
  24. Strain, E. C., Bigelow, G. E., Liebson, I. A., Stitzer, M. L. Moderate vs high-dose methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence: A randomized trial. JAMA, vol. 281, no. 11, 1999, pp. 1000–1005. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.11.1000
  25. Deliens, T., Clarys, P., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Deforche, B. Determinants of eating behaviour in university students: A qualitative study using focus group discussions. BMC Public Health, vol. 14, no. 1, 2014, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-53
  26. Lee, H. C., Ke, K. H. Monitoring of large-area IoT sensors using LoRa wireless mesh network system: Design and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 67, no. 9, Sept. 2018, pp. 2177-2187. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2018.2814082
  27. Lilly, C. M., Cody, S., Zhao, H., Landry, K., Baker, S. P., McIlwaine, J., Chandler, M. W., Irwin, R. S. Hospital mortality, length of stay, and preventable complications among critically ill patients before and after tele-ICU reengineering of critical care processes. JAMA, vol. 305, no. 21, 2011, pp. 2175–2183. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2025-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8764 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4333
Language: English
Page range: 217 - 229
Submitted on: Jan 25, 2025
|
Accepted on: Nov 6, 2025
|
Published on: Dec 8, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Fazıl Akdağ, Fatma Betül Künyeli, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.