Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Key Factors and Strategies for Implementing Property Reuse Systems in Age-Friendly Social Housing Development Cover

Key Factors and Strategies for Implementing Property Reuse Systems in Age-Friendly Social Housing Development

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Greenfield, E. A., Buffel, T. Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: Research to Strengthen Policy and Practice. J. Aging Soc. Policy, vol. 34, no. 2, 2022, pp. 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2022.2049573
  2. Jarzebski, M. P. et al. Ageing and population shrinking: implications for sustainability in the urban century. npj Urban Sustain., vol. 1, no. 1, 2021, 17 p. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00023-z
  3. Sanchaniya, R. J., Geipele, I. Identifying Existing Properties for Reuse Into Social Housing. Eng. Rural Dev., vol. 22, 2023, pp. 100–107. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev.2023.22.TF018
  4. Veginadu, P., Calache, H., Gussy, M., Pandian, A., Masood, M. An overview of methodological approaches in systematic reviews. J. Evid. Based. Med., vol. 15, no. 1, 2022, pp. 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12468
  5. Golant, S. M. Aging in the Right Place, Baltimore: Health Profession Press, 2015, 416 p.
  6. Kim, K., Buckley, T., Burnette, D., Kim, S., Cho, S. Measurement Indicators of Age-Friendly Communities: Findings From the AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey. Gerontologist, vol. 62, no. 1, 2022, pp. 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab055
  7. Schwanen, T., Ziegler, F. Wellbeing, independence and mobility: an introduction. Ageing & Society, vol. 31, no. 5, 2011, pp. 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001467
  8. Bullen, P. A., Love, P. E. D. Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Struct. Surv., vol. 29, no. 5, 2011, pp. 411–421.
  9. Bansal, S., Pandey, S. Legal frameworks for sustainable urban development: Analysing the efficacy of zoning regulations in promoting environmental conservation. E3S Web of Conferences, 527, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202452701022
  10. Ngo, L. M., Nguyen, H. B., Nguyen, T. P. U., Nguyen, T. M. D. On transforming unused urban spaces to social housing for self-employed people in Ho Chi Minh City: An architectural space design proposal. Sustainabilty, vol. 13, no. 21, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112175
  11. Vitman, A., Iecovich, E., Alfasi, N. Ageism and social integration of older adults in their neighborhoods in Israel. Gerontologist, vol. 54, no. 2, 2014, pp. 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt008
  12. Labor, I. Braga, M., Palvarini, P. Social Housing in the EU. Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy. European Parliament, 2013. 60 p.
  13. Ottoni, C. A., Sims-Gould, J., Winters, M. Safety perceptions of older adults on an urban greenway: Interplay of the social and built environment. Health Place, vol. 70, 2021, p. 102605, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102605
  14. Berke, P. R., Godschalk, D. R. Urban Land Use Planning. University of Illinois Press, 2009. 490 p.
  15. Fainstein, S. S. The Just City. Cornell University Press, 2010. 212 p.
  16. Douglas, J. Building Adaptationion, Routledge, 2006. 680 p.
  17. Aigwi, I. E., Ingham, J., Phipps, R., Filippova, O. Identifying parameters for a performance-based framework: Towards prioritising underutilised historical buildings for adaptive reuse in New Zealand. Cities, vol. 102, no. April, 2020, p. 102756, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102756
  18. Langston, C., Wong, F. K., Hui, E. C., Shen, L. Y. Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong, Build. Environ., vol. 43, no. 10, 2008, pp. 1709–1718, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017
  19. Dyson, K., Matthews, J., Love, P. Critical success factors of adapting heritage buildings: An exploratory study. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag., vol. 6, no. 1, 2016, pp. 44–57.
  20. Conejos, S., Langston, C., Chan, E. H. W., Chew, M. Y. L. Governance of heritage buildings: Australian regulatory barriers to adaptive reuse. Building Research & Information, vol. 44, no. 5–6, 2016, pp. 507–519.
  21. Djebbour, I., Biara, R. W. Sustainability comparative assessment of the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings as museums: Case of Tlemcen. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 75(3), 7–20, vol. 75, 2019, p. 3, https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.75.3.22133
  22. Preiser, W. F. E., Smith, K. H. Universal design handbook. Education: McGraw-Hill, 2011, 496 p.
  23. Steinfeld, E., Maisel, J. Universal Design: Creating Inclusive Environments. Wiley, 2012, 382 p.
  24. Van Hoof, J., Marston, H. R., Brittain, K. R., Barrie, H. R. Creating age-friendly communities: Housing and Technology. Healthcare, vol. 7, no. 4, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7040130
  25. Vakil, N., Colistra, J. Participatory design in housing, 5th Biennial Pennsylvania Housing Research Residential Building Design and Construction Conference Proceedings, 2020.
  26. Maclennan, D., Ong, R., Wood, G. Making connections: housing, productivity and economic development. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited, Melbourne, 2015, 122 p.
  27. Yung, E. H. K., Chan, E. H. W., Xu, Y. Community-initiated adaptive reuse of historic buildings and sustainable development in the inner city of Shanghai. J. Urban Plan. Dev., vol. 140, no. 3, 2014.
  28. Mérai, D., Veldpaus, L., Pendlebury, J., Kip, M. The Governance Context for Adaptive Heritage Reuse: A Review and Typology of Fifteen European Countries. Hist. Environ. Policy Pract., vol. 13, no. 4, 2022, pp. 526–546, https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2022.2153201
  29. Tsenkova, S. Perspective Chapter: Reimaging Affordable Housing through Adaptive Reuse of Built Heritage. 2023.
  30. Viola, S. Built heritage repurposing and communities engagement: Symbiosis, enabling processes, key challenges. Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 4, 2022, 2320 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042320
  31. Veldpaus, L., Fava, F., Brodowicz, D. Mapping of current heritage re-use policies and regulations in Europe: Complex policy overview of adaptive heritage re-use. December, 2019, 254 p.
  32. Henderson, J. V. Cities and Development. J. Urban Econ., vol. 38, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00636.x
  33. Kerzner, H. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley, February, 2013. p. 1296
  34. Hillson, D., Dalcher, D., Eds. Managing Risk in Projects. Fundamentals of Project Management. Gower Publishing, 2009. p. 102
  35. Meredith, J. R., Mantel, S. J. Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley, 2012, 600 p.
  36. Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R. Creating shared value. Harv. Bus. Rev., vol. 89, no. 1/2, 2011, pp. 62–77.
  37. Myers, D. Construction Economics: A New Approach. Routledge, 2013, 335 p.
  38. Ryberg-Webster, S., Kinahan, K. L. Historic Preservation and Urban Revitalization in the Twenty-first Century. J. Plan. Lit., vol. 29, no. 2, 2014, pp. 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412213510524
  39. Ho, M. Y., Lai, J. H. K., Hou, H., Zhang, D. Key performance indicators for evaluation of commercial building retrofits: Shortlisting via an industry survey. Energies, vol. 14, no. 21, 2021, p. 7327. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217327
  40. Mosca, F., Perini, K. Reviewing the role of key performance indicators in architectural and urban design practices. Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 21, 2022, 14464, https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114464
  41. Preiser, W. F. E., Vischer J. C. Assessing Building Performance. Routledge, 2005. 286 p.
  42. Senge, P. M. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday, 1990, 445 p.
  43. Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., Allen, R. E. S. The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. Gerontologist, vol. 52, no. 3, 2012, pp. 357–366.
  44. Buffel, T., Phillipson, C. Ageing in a Gentrifying Neighbourhood: Experiences of Community Change in Later Life. Sociology, vol. 53, no. 6, 2019, pp. 987–1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519836848
  45. Remøy, H., van der Voordt, T. Adaptive reuse of office buildings into housing: Opportunities and risks. Build. Res. Inf., vol. 42, no. 3, 2014, pp. 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.865922
  46. Carr, K., Weir, P. L., Azar, D., Azar, N. R. Universal design: A step toward successful aging. J. Aging Res., vol. 2013, 324624. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/324624
  47. Healey, P. Collaborative planning in perspective. Plan. Theory, vol. 2, no. 2, 2003, pp. 101–123.
  48. Gibson, R. B. Sustainability assessment: Basic components of a practical approach, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., vol. 24, no. 3, 2006, pp. 170–182.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2025-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8764 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4333
Language: English
Page range: 139 - 150
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2024
|
Accepted on: Feb 17, 2025
|
Published on: Oct 18, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 Rashmi Jaymin Sanchaniya, Ineta Geipele, Antra Kundziņa, Jurgita Černeckienė, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.