Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Invisible Inheritable Urban Biomimicry: How to Re-discover and Evaluate It Cover

Invisible Inheritable Urban Biomimicry: How to Re-discover and Evaluate It

Open Access
|Sep 2025

References

  1. Uchiyama, Y., Blanco, E., Kohsaka, R. Application of biomimetics to architectural and urban design: A review across scales. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 9813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239813">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239813
  2. Quintero, A., Zarzavilla, M., Tejedor-Flores, N., Mora, D., Chen Austin, M. Sustainability assessment of the anthropogenic system in Panama City: Application of biomimetic strategies towards regenerative cities. Biomimetics, 2021, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics6040064">https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics6040064
  3. Zari, M. P. Regenerative urban design and ecosystem biomimicry. Routledge, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315114330">https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315114330
  4. Beatley, T., Newman, P. Biophilic cities are sustainable, resilient cities. Sustainability, 2013, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 3328–3345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083328">https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083328
  5. Pohl, G., Nachtigall, W. Biomimetics for Architecture & Design: Nature-Analogies-Technology. Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19120-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19120-1
  6. Milliken, S., Kotzen, B., Walimbe, S., Coutts, C., Beatley, T. Biophilic cities and health. Cities & Health, 2023, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2023.2176200">https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2023.2176200
  7. Sowińska-Świerkosz, B., García, J. What are Nature-based solutions (NBS)? Setting core ideas for concept clarification. Nature-Based Solutions, 2022, vol. 2, p. 100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100009
  8. Benyus, J. M. Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. William Morrow, 1997. 308 p.
  9. Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A. J., Smith, A., Turner, B. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 2020, vol. 375, no. 1794, p. 20190120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120">https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120
  10. Beatley, T. Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Island Press, 2011. 192 p. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-59726-986-5">https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-59726-986-5
  11. Salingaros, N. A., et al. Biophilia & healing environments: Healthy principles for designing the built world. New York, NY, USA: Terrapin Bright Green, 2015.
  12. Gertik, A., Karaman, A. The fractal approach in the biomimetic urban design: Le Corbusier and Patrick Schumacher. Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 7682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097682">https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097682
  13. VOSviewer [online, cited 2024-07-02]. https://www.vosviewer.com/
  14. Mansour, H. Biomimicry: A 21st-century design strategy integrating with nature in a sustainable way. BUE, FISC, 2010, vol. 12.
  15. Mohammed, B. Y., Andrey, R. Biomimicry architecture: From the inspiration by nature to the innovation of the Saharan architecture. Architecture and Engineering, 2018, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3–12.
  16. Smith, S. E., Smith, F. A. Fresh perspectives on the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant nutrition and growth. Mycologia, 2012, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3852/11-229">https://doi.org/10.3852/11-229
  17. Pawlyn, M. Biomimicry in architecture. RIBA Publishing, 2019. 176 p.
  18. Taylor Buck, N. The art of imitating life: The potential contribution of biomimicry in shaping the future of our cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 2017, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515611417">https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515611417
  19. Garde, A. New urbanism: Past, present, and future. Urban Planning, 2020, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 453–463. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3478">https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3478
  20. Monclús, J., Díez Medina, C. Modern urban planning and modernist urbanism (1930–1950). In Urban Visions: From Planning Culture to Landscape Urbanism, 2018, pp. 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59047-9_4">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59047-9_4
  21. Lydon, M., Garcia, A. Tactical Urbanism: Short-term Action for Long-term Change. Island Press, 2015. 256 p.
  22. Meck, S. (ed.). Growing Smart Legislative Guidebook: Model Statutes for Planning and the Management of Change. Routledge, 2020.
  23. Hrelja, R., et al. Transit Oriented Development (TOD): A Literature Review. 2020. 48 p.
  24. Spiliotopoulou, M., Roseland, M. Urban sustainability: From theory influences to practical agendas. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, no. 18, p. 7245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187245">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187245
  25. The Urban Scale Sustainability Compass [online, cited 01.08.2024]. http://sustainabilitycompass.eu/.
  26. Lerner, J. Urban Acupuncture. Island Press, 2014. 144 p. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-584-7">https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-584-7
  27. Alexander, Ch. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, 2018. 1171 p.
  28. Mehaffy, M. W., et al. A New Pattern Language for Growing Regions: Places, Networks, Processes. Portland, Oregon, USA: Sustasis Press, 2020. 363 p.
  29. Park, Y. The network of patterns: creating a design guide using Christopher Alexander's pattern language. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2015, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1068/b130072p">https://doi.org/10.1068/b130072p
  30. Almy, D., Benedikt, M. Center 14: On Landscape Urbanism. The University of Texas, Austin, 2007. 359 p.
  31. Turner, T. City as landscape: A post post-modern view of design and planning. Taylor & Francis, 2014.
  32. Lane, M. B. Public participation in planning: An intellectual history. Australian Geographer, 2005, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325694">https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325694
  33. Chambers, R. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 1994, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4">https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4
  34. Asian Development Bank. Cities for All: An Introduction to Inclusive Cities [online, cited 01.08.2024]. https://seads.adb.org/events/cities-all-introduction-inclusive-cities
  35. Moreno, C. The 15-Minute City: A Solution to Saving Our Time and Our Planet. John Wiley & Sons, 2024. 304 p.
  36. Urban Green Blue Grids. Hammarby Sjöstad, Stockholm, Sweden [online, cited 01.08.2024]. https://urbangreenbluegrids.com/projects/hammarby-sjostad-stockholm-sweden/
  37. Verve. An Old Vision of New Living [online, cited 01.08.2024]. https://www.vervemagazine.co.nz/an-old-vision-of-new-living/
  38. ka-news.de. Karlsruhe von oben: Spektakuläre Ausblicke über die Waldstadt [online, cited 01.08.2024]. https://www.ka-news.de/region/karlsruhe/karlsruhe-von-oben-spektakulaere-ausblicke-ueber-die-waldstadt-eine-bilderstrecke-art-2565889
  39. Siegfried, R. Agent-based modeling and simulation. In: Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems: A Framework for Efficient Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2014, pp. 11–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07529-3_2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07529-3_2
  40. Stolk, E., et al. Model Town: Using Urban Simulation in New Town Planning. Meppel: SUN Publishers, 2009. 200 p.
  41. Hillier, B. Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Space Syntax, 2007. 370 p.
  42. Turner, A. Depthmap 4: A researcher's handbook. Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, University College London, 2004. [cited 01.08.2024]. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/2651
  43. Porta, S., Latora, V., Strano, E. Networks in urban design: Six years of research in multiple centrality assessment. In: Network science: Complexity in nature and technology, Springer, 2010, pp. 107–129.
  44. Estrada, E., Fox, M., Higham, D. J., Oppo, G.-L. Complex networks: An invitation. In: Network science: Complexity in nature and technology, Springer, 2010, pp. 1–11.
  45. Porta, S., Crucitti, P., Latora, V. The network analysis of urban streets: A primal approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2006, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32045">https://doi.org/10.1068/b32045
  46. Batty, M. The new science of cities. MIT Press, 2013. 520 p.
  47. Sevtsuk, A., Mekonnen, M. Urban network analysis. Revue internationale de géomatique, 2012, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 287–305.
  48. McElhinney, S. Isovists.org. 2019. https://isovists.org/
  49. Cooper, C. H. V., Chiaradia, A. J. F. sDNA: 3-d spatial network analysis for GIS, CAD, Command Line & Python. SoftwareX, 2020, vol. 12, 100525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100525">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100525
  50. Porta, S., Latora, V. Centrality and cities: Multiple centrality assessment as a tool for urban analysis and design. In: Network science: Complexity in nature and technology, Springer, 2010, pp. 107–129.
  51. Dupuy, G., van Schaick, J., Klaasen, I. T. Urban networks: Network urbanism. Amsterdam: Techne Press, 2008.
  52. Diestel, R. Graph theory. Springer, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-70107-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-70107-2
  53. Sabidussi, G. The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 1966, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289527">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289527
  54. Freeman, L. C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 1977, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 35–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543">https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543
  55. Marcus, L. Spatial capital and how to measure it: An outline of an analytical theory of the social performativity of urban form. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–15 June 2007.
  56. Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1993, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029">https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029
  57. Ye, Y., van Nes, A. Quantitative tools in urban morphology: Combining space syntax, spacematrix and mixed-use index in a GIS framework. Urban Morphology, 2014, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 97–118. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v18i2.3997">https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v18i2.3997
  58. Hillier, B. Centrality as a process: Accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International, 1999, vol. 4, nos. 3–4, pp. 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/135753199350036">https://doi.org/10.1080/135753199350036
  59. Lennard, H. L., Lennard, S. H. Proceedings of the 19th International Making Cities Livable Conference – Children and Youth in the City. Charleston, SC, USA, March 9–13, 1997.
  60. Hillier, B. Centrality as a process: Accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International, 1997, vol. 4, nos. 3–4, pp. 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.1999.19">https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.1999.19
  61. Van Nes, A. Road building and urban change: The effect of ring roads on the dispersal of shop and retail in Western European towns and cities. Agricultural University of Norway, Department of Land Use and Landscape Planning, 2002.
  62. Van Nes, A., Yamu, C. Introduction to space syntax in urban studies. Springer Nature, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59140-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59140-3
  63. Hillier, B., et al. Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1993, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029">https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029
  64. Berhie, G. K., et al. Land use and transport mode choices: space syntax analysis of American cities. Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research, 2017, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17831/enq:arcc.v14i1.429">https://doi.org/10.17831/enq:arcc.v14i1.429
  65. Van Nes, A., López, M. J. J. Micro scale spatial relationships in urban studies: The relationship between private and public space and its impact on street life. In: Proceedings of the 6th Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 2007, pp. 12–15.
  66. Zaleckis, K., Czarnecki, B. Energy-saving potential in planning urban functional areas: The case of Bialystok (Poland). Land, 2023, vol. 12, no. 2, article 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020380">https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020380
  67. Peponis, J., Bafna, S., Zhang, Z. The connectivity of streets: reach and directional distance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2008, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 881–901. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33089">https://doi.org/10.1068/b33089
  68. Hillier, B., Hanson, J. The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237
  69. Palaiologou, G., Griffiths, S. The uses of space syntax historical research for policy development in heritage urbanism. In: Cultural Urban Heritage: Development, Learning and Landscape Strategies, 2019, pp. 19–34.
  70. Zaleckis, K., Doğan, H. A., Lopez Arce, N. Evaluation of the interventions to built heritage: Analysis of selected facades of Kaunas by space syntax and sociological methods. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, no. 8, 4784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084784">https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084784
  71. Hillier, B. Is architectural form meaningless? A configurational theory of generic meaning in architecture, and its limits. Journal of Space Syntax, 2011, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 125–153.
  72. Yang, T., Hillier, B. The fuzzy boundary: The spatial definition of urban areas. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 2007, pp. 091.01–091.16.
  73. Hillier, B. Spatial sustainability in cities: Organic patterns and sustainable forms. In: Koch, D., Marcus, L., Steen, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden, 2009, pp. K01.1–K01.20.
  74. Bobkova, E., Marcus, L., Pont, B. Multivariable measures of plot systems: Describing the potential link between urban diversity and spatial form. In: Proceedings of the 11th Space Syntax Symposium, Lisbon, Portugal, 2017.
  75. Zaleckis, K., Doğan, H. A., Lopez Arce, N. Walkability compass—a space syntax solution for comparative studies. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, no. 4, 2033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042033">https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042033
  76. Sevtsuk, A., Kalvo, R. Predicting pedestrian flow along city streets: A comparison of route choice estimation approaches in downtown San Francisco. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2022, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.18583">https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.18583
  77. Sevtsuk, A. Estimating pedestrian flows on street networks: Revisiting the betweenness index. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2021, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 512–526.
  78. Karimi, K. The configurational structures of social spaces: Space syntax and urban morphology in the context of analytical, evidence-based design. Land, 2023, vol. 12, no. 11, 2084. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12112084">https://doi.org/10.3390/land12112084
  79. Hillier, W. R. G., Yang, T., Turner, A. Normalising least angle choice in Depthmap—and how it opens up new perspectives on the global and local analysis of city space. Journal of Space Syntax, 2012, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 155–193. http://joss.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/journal/index.php/joss/article/view/141/pdf
  80. Poerbo, H. W., et al. Space syntax analysis for assessment of TOD area. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2022, vol. 1058, 012027.
  81. Karimi, K. A configurational approach to analytical urban design: ‘Space syntax’ methodology. Urban Design International, 2012, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.19">https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2012.19
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2025-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8764 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4333
Language: English
Page range: 99 - 120
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 5, 2025
Published on: Sep 2, 2025
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2025 Kestutis Zaleckis, Indre Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, Gediminas Viliūnas, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.