Uchiyama, Y., Blanco, E., Kohsaka, R. Application of biomimetics to architectural and urban design: A review across scales. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 9813. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239813">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239813
Quintero, A., Zarzavilla, M., Tejedor-Flores, N., Mora, D., Chen Austin, M. Sustainability assessment of the anthropogenic system in Panama City: Application of biomimetic strategies towards regenerative cities. Biomimetics, 2021, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics6040064">https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics6040064
Sowińska-Świerkosz, B., García, J. What are Nature-based solutions (NBS)? Setting core ideas for concept clarification. Nature-Based Solutions, 2022, vol. 2, p. 100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100009
Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A. J., Smith, A., Turner, B. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 2020, vol. 375, no. 1794, p. 20190120. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120">https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0120
Beatley, T.Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Island Press, 2011. 192 p. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-59726-986-5">https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-59726-986-5
Salingaros, N. A., et al.Biophilia & healing environments: Healthy principles for designing the built world. New York, NY, USA: Terrapin Bright Green, 2015.
Gertik, A., Karaman, A. The fractal approach in the biomimetic urban design: Le Corbusier and Patrick Schumacher. Sustainability, 2023, vol. 15, no. 9, p. 7682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097682">https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097682
Mohammed, B. Y., Andrey, R. Biomimicry architecture: From the inspiration by nature to the innovation of the Saharan architecture. Architecture and Engineering, 2018, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3–12.
Smith, S. E., Smith, F. A. Fresh perspectives on the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant nutrition and growth. Mycologia, 2012, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3852/11-229">https://doi.org/10.3852/11-229
Taylor Buck, N. The art of imitating life: The potential contribution of biomimicry in shaping the future of our cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 2017, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515611417">https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515611417
Garde, A. New urbanism: Past, present, and future. Urban Planning, 2020, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 453–463. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3478">https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3478
Monclús, J., Díez Medina, C. Modern urban planning and modernist urbanism (1930–1950). In Urban Visions: From Planning Culture to Landscape Urbanism, 2018, pp. 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59047-9_4">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59047-9_4
Spiliotopoulou, M., Roseland, M. Urban sustainability: From theory influences to practical agendas. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, no. 18, p. 7245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187245">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187245
Park, Y. The network of patterns: creating a design guide using Christopher Alexander's pattern language. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2015, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1068/b130072p">https://doi.org/10.1068/b130072p
Lane, M. B. Public participation in planning: An intellectual history. Australian Geographer, 2005, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325694">https://doi.org/10.1080/00049180500325694
Chambers, R. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 1994, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4">https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4
Asian Development Bank. Cities for All: An Introduction to Inclusive Cities [online, cited 01.08.2024]. https://seads.adb.org/events/cities-all-introduction-inclusive-cities
Urban Green Blue Grids. Hammarby Sjöstad, Stockholm, Sweden [online, cited 01.08.2024]. https://urbangreenbluegrids.com/projects/hammarby-sjostad-stockholm-sweden/
ka-news.de. Karlsruhe von oben: Spektakuläre Ausblicke über die Waldstadt [online, cited 01.08.2024]. https://www.ka-news.de/region/karlsruhe/karlsruhe-von-oben-spektakulaere-ausblicke-ueber-die-waldstadt-eine-bilderstrecke-art-2565889
Siegfried, R. Agent-based modeling and simulation. In: Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems: A Framework for Efficient Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2014, pp. 11–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07529-3_2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07529-3_2
Turner, A.Depthmap 4: A researcher's handbook. Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, University College London, 2004. [cited 01.08.2024]. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/2651
Porta, S., Latora, V., Strano, E. Networks in urban design: Six years of research in multiple centrality assessment. In: Network science: Complexity in nature and technology, Springer, 2010, pp. 107–129.
Estrada, E., Fox, M., Higham, D. J., Oppo, G.-L. Complex networks: An invitation. In: Network science: Complexity in nature and technology, Springer, 2010, pp. 1–11.
Porta, S., Crucitti, P., Latora, V. The network analysis of urban streets: A primal approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2006, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32045">https://doi.org/10.1068/b32045
Cooper, C. H. V., Chiaradia, A. J. F. sDNA: 3-d spatial network analysis for GIS, CAD, Command Line & Python. SoftwareX, 2020, vol. 12, 100525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100525">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100525
Porta, S., Latora, V. Centrality and cities: Multiple centrality assessment as a tool for urban analysis and design. In: Network science: Complexity in nature and technology, Springer, 2010, pp. 107–129.
Sabidussi, G. The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 1966, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289527">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289527
Freeman, L. C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 1977, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 35–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543">https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543
Marcus, L. Spatial capital and how to measure it: An outline of an analytical theory of the social performativity of urban form. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–15 June 2007.
Ye, Y., van Nes, A. Quantitative tools in urban morphology: Combining space syntax, spacematrix and mixed-use index in a GIS framework. Urban Morphology, 2014, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 97–118. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v18i2.3997">https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v18i2.3997
Hillier, B. Centrality as a process: Accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International, 1999, vol. 4, nos. 3–4, pp. 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/135753199350036">https://doi.org/10.1080/135753199350036
Lennard, H. L., Lennard, S. H.Proceedings of the 19th International Making Cities Livable Conference – Children and Youth in the City. Charleston, SC, USA, March 9–13, 1997.
Hillier, B. Centrality as a process: Accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International, 1997, vol. 4, nos. 3–4, pp. 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.1999.19">https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.1999.19
Van Nes, A.Road building and urban change: The effect of ring roads on the dispersal of shop and retail in Western European towns and cities. Agricultural University of Norway, Department of Land Use and Landscape Planning, 2002.
Van Nes, A., Yamu, C.Introduction to space syntax in urban studies. Springer Nature, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59140-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59140-3
Hillier, B., et al. Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1993, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029">https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029
Berhie, G. K., et al. Land use and transport mode choices: space syntax analysis of American cities. Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research, 2017, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17831/enq:arcc.v14i1.429">https://doi.org/10.17831/enq:arcc.v14i1.429
Van Nes, A., López, M. J. J. Micro scale spatial relationships in urban studies: The relationship between private and public space and its impact on street life. In: Proceedings of the 6th Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 2007, pp. 12–15.
Zaleckis, K., Czarnecki, B. Energy-saving potential in planning urban functional areas: The case of Bialystok (Poland). Land, 2023, vol. 12, no. 2, article 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020380">https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020380
Peponis, J., Bafna, S., Zhang, Z. The connectivity of streets: reach and directional distance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2008, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 881–901. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33089">https://doi.org/10.1068/b33089
Hillier, B., Hanson, J.The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237
Palaiologou, G., Griffiths, S. The uses of space syntax historical research for policy development in heritage urbanism. In: Cultural Urban Heritage: Development, Learning and Landscape Strategies, 2019, pp. 19–34.
Zaleckis, K., Doğan, H. A., Lopez Arce, N. Evaluation of the interventions to built heritage: Analysis of selected facades of Kaunas by space syntax and sociological methods. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, no. 8, 4784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084784">https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084784
Hillier, B. Is architectural form meaningless? A configurational theory of generic meaning in architecture, and its limits. Journal of Space Syntax, 2011, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 125–153.
Yang, T., Hillier, B. The fuzzy boundary: The spatial definition of urban areas. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, 2007, pp. 091.01–091.16.
Hillier, B. Spatial sustainability in cities: Organic patterns and sustainable forms. In: Koch, D., Marcus, L., Steen, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden, 2009, pp. K01.1–K01.20.
Bobkova, E., Marcus, L., Pont, B. Multivariable measures of plot systems: Describing the potential link between urban diversity and spatial form. In: Proceedings of the 11th Space Syntax Symposium, Lisbon, Portugal, 2017.
Zaleckis, K., Doğan, H. A., Lopez Arce, N. Walkability compass—a space syntax solution for comparative studies. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, no. 4, 2033. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042033">https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042033
Sevtsuk, A., Kalvo, R. Predicting pedestrian flow along city streets: A comparison of route choice estimation approaches in downtown San Francisco. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2022, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.18583">https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.18583
Sevtsuk, A. Estimating pedestrian flows on street networks: Revisiting the betweenness index. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2021, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 512–526.
Karimi, K. The configurational structures of social spaces: Space syntax and urban morphology in the context of analytical, evidence-based design. Land, 2023, vol. 12, no. 11, 2084. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12112084">https://doi.org/10.3390/land12112084
Hillier, W. R. G., Yang, T., Turner, A. Normalising least angle choice in Depthmap—and how it opens up new perspectives on the global and local analysis of city space. Journal of Space Syntax, 2012, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 155–193. http://joss.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/journal/index.php/joss/article/view/141/pdf
Poerbo, H. W., et al. Space syntax analysis for assessment of TOD area. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2022, vol. 1058, 012027.