Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Architects from Different Fields of Activities in Lithuania and their Specific Mindsets Cover

Architects from Different Fields of Activities in Lithuania and their Specific Mindsets

Open Access
|Sep 2024

References

  1. Erman, T., Altay, B., Altay, C. Architects and the Architectural Profession in the Turkish Context. Journal of Architectural Education, vol. 58, no. 2, 2004, pp. 4653. https://doi.org/10.1162/1046488042485394
  2. Cohen, L., Wilkinson, A., Arnold, J., Finn, R. ‘Remember I’m the Bloody Architect!’ Architects, organizations and discourses of profession. Work, Employment and Society, vol. 19, no. 4, 2005, pp.775–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017005058065
  3. Hemström, K., Mahapatra, K., Gustavsson, L. Perceptions, attitudes and interest of Swedish architects towards the use of wood frames in multi-storey buildings. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 55, no. 11, 2011, pp. 1013– 1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.012
  4. Ilgın, H. E., Karjalainen, M., Pelsmakers, S. Finnish architects’ attitudes towards multi-storey timber-residential buildings. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, vol. 42 no. 3, 2024, pp. 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-04-2021-0059
  5. ACE Observatory – Home – Europe 2022 [online]. Architects’ Council of Europe [cited 01.03.2024]. https://www.ace-cae.eu/activities/publications/ace-2022-sector-study/
  6. Maciuika, J. V., Drėmaitė, M. (eds.). Lithuanian architects assess the Soviet era: the 1992 oral history tapes / Lietuvos architektai pasakoja apie sovietmetį: 1992 m. įrašai. Vilnius, Lithuania: Lapas, 2020. 256 p.
  7. Grunskis, T., Reklaitė, J. Laisvės architektūra. Vilnius: Baltos lankos, 2012. 383 p.
  8. Čiupailaitė, D. Architektų vaidmens ir statuso dilemos posocialistiniame mieste. Santalka: Filosofija. Komunikacija, vol. 22, no. 1, 2014, pp. 15–37.
  9. Vyšniūnas, A. Hamletiškas klausimas: architektas – profesija ar statusas [online, cited 01.03.2024]. http://pilotas.lt/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/files_urbopopulizmas_2012_12.pdf
  10. Dijokienė, D., Navickienė, E., Riaubienė, E. Self-awareness of Soviet Lithuanian architects in their creative power and social significance. Buildings, vol. 12, no. 1, 2022, 10001. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010001
  11. Riaubienė, E., Navickienė, E., Dijokienė, D. The profile of Lithuanian architects in relation to the professional generations active today. Landscape Architecture and Art, vol. 22, no. 22, 2023, pp. 69–80. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2023.22.07
  12. Navickienė, E. From Art-Creator towards Moderator: Roles of Lithuanian Architects. ACE: Architecture, City and Environment, vol. 18, no. 53, 2023, 11907. https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.18.53.11907
  13. Leech, N., Onwuegbuzie, A. A Typology of Mixed Methods Research Designs. Quality and Quantity, vol. 43, no. 2, 2009, pp. 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
  14. Kardelis, K. Mokslinių tyrimų metodologija ir metodai. Kaunas: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidybos centras, 2002. 488 p.
  15. Tidikis, R. Socialinių mokslų tyrimų metodologija. Vilnius: LTU, 2003. 626 p.
  16. Trochim, W. M. K., Donnelly, J. P. The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Cengage Learning, 2008. 361 p.
  17. Trochim, W. M. K., Descriptive Statistics [online]. Research Methods Knowledge Base, Cengage Publishing, 2006 [cited 01.03.2024]. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statdesc.php
  18. Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). T housand Oaks, C A: Sage, 2004. 413 p.
  19. Braun V., Clarke V. Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications, 2021. 376 p.
  20. Mustapha, A., Mohammad, M., Noorhani, N., Abidin, Z. Establishment the Scope of Work for Interior Designers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 105, 2013, pp. 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2013.11.089
  21. Ahmad Noorhani, N., Mustapha, A. Interior Design Practice: Project Management Competency Framework. Built Environment Journal, [S.l.], vol. 18, no. 1, 2021, pp. 98 105. https://doi.org/10.24191/bej.v18i1.12991
  22. Duffy CBE, F., Rabeneck, A. Professionalism and architects in the 21st century. Building Research & Information, vol. 41, no. 1, 2013, pp. 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.724541
  23. Bos-de Vos, M., Lieftink, M. B., Lauche, K. How to claim what is mine: Negotiating roles in inter-organizational projects. Journal of Professions and Organization, vol. 6, no. 2, 2019, pp. 128–155.
  24. Burr, K. L., Jones, C. B. The Role of the Architect: Changes of the Past, Practices of the Present, and Indications of the Future. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, vol. 6, no. 2, 2010, pp. 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2010.482878
  25. Ahuja, S. Professional Identity Threats in Interprofessional Collaborations: A Case of Architects in Professional Service Firms. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 60, no. 2, 2023, pp. 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12847
  26. Ahuja, S., Nikolova, N. and Clegg, S. Paradoxical Identity: The Changing Nature of Architectural Work and Its Relation to Architects’ Identity. Journal of Professions and Organization, vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, pp. 219. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jow013
  27. Kashef, M. The Urban Design Discourse and Professional Divide. Open House International, vol. 32, no. 3, 2007, pp. 27– 37. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-03-2007-B0004
  28. Childs, M. C. A Spectrum of Urban Design Roles. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 15, no. 1, 2010, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800903429357
  29. Ahmad Noorhani, N. M., Mustapha, A. A., Adnan, H. Project Management Roles and Task for Interior Designer during Design Phase. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, vol. 12, no. 5, 2021, pp. 136–146. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.05.014
  30. Andereas, P. “MESE” Fundamental as Best Human Interior Designer. Journal of Engineering and Scientific Research, vol. 1, no. 2, 2019, pp. 59–63. https://doi.org/10.23960/jesr.v1i2.15
  31. Buchanan, R. Surroundings and Environments in Fourth Order Design. Design Issues, vol. 35, no. 1, 2019, pp. 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00517
  32. Smith, D., Metcalfe, P., Lommerse, M. Interior architecture as an agent for wellbeing. Journal of the HEIA, vol. 19, no. 3, 2012, pp. 2–9.
  33. Anderson, B., Honey, P., Dudek, M. Interior Design’s Social Compact: Key to the Quest for Professional Status. Journal of Interior Design, vol. 33, no. 2, 2007, pp. 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2007.tb00313.x
  34. Buie Harwood, M.F.A. Comparing the Standards in Interior Design and Architecture to Assess Similarities and Differences. Journal of Interior Design Education and Research, vol. 17, no. 1, 1991, pp. 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.1991.tb00058.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2024-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8764 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4333
Language: English
Submitted on: Apr 5, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 24, 2024
Published on: Sep 7, 2024
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Edita Riaubienė, Eglė Navickienė, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.