Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mixed-use and Street Network Attributes of Vibrant Urban Settings Cover

Mixed-use and Street Network Attributes of Vibrant Urban Settings

By: Mohamad Kashef  
Open Access
|Nov 2023

References

  1. Jacobs, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House Inc. New York, 1961. 458 p.
  2. Alexander, C. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977. 1171 p.
  3. Trancik, R. Finding Lost Space: Theories of Urban Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1986. 256 p.
  4. Kashef, M. S ense o f c ommunity a nd r esidential s pace: contextualizing new urbanism within a broader theoretical framework. International Journal of Architectural Research (IJAR), vol. 2, no. 3, 2009, pp. 80–97.
  5. Barnett, J. City Design: Modernist, Traditional, Green and Systems Perspectives. London: Routledge; 2nd Edition, 2016. 276 p.
  6. Rowe, C., Koetter, F. Collage City. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1978. 185 p.
  7. Krier, R. Urban Space. New York: Rizzoli, 1979. 174 p.
  8. Kashef, M., El Shafie, M. A multifaceted perspective on North American urban development. Frontiers of architectural research, vol. 9, no. 2, 2020, pp. 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.12.006
  9. Rossi, A. The Architecture of the City. MIT Press, Reprint Edition, Sep. 13, 1984. 202 p.
  10. Cullen, G. Concise Townscape. Architectural Press, March 24, 1995. 200 p.
  11. Krier, L. Architecture: Choice or fate. London: Papadakis, 1998. 208 p.
  12. Rapoport, A. Human Aspects of Urban Form: Towards a Man – Environment Approach to Urban Form and Design. Pergamon; 1st Edition, 1977. 448 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-02616-3
  13. Bramiana, C., Biasatti, R., Harsritanto, B. Implementing Mixed Land Use Rooting Jane Jacobs’ Concept of Diversity in Urban Sustainability. MODUL, vol. 17, no. 1, 2017, pp. 27–35. https://doi.org/10.14710/mdl.17.1.2017.27-35
  14. Newman, O. Defensible Space: Crime Prevention through Urban Design. London: MacMillan Publishing Company, 1st Edition, 1973. 264 p.
  15. Rapoport, A. The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. University of Arizona Press, April 1, 1990. 253 p.
  16. Kashef, M. The Urban Design Discourse and Professional Divide. Open House International, vol. 32, no. 3, 2007, pp. 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-03-2007-B0004
  17. Canter, D. The Psychology of Place. Amazon Kindle Edition, 2016. 198 p.
  18. Lynch, K. The Image of the City. Boston: The MIT Press, 1960. 208 p.
  19. Lynch, K. A Theory of Good City Form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981. 514 p.
  20. Lang, J. Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products. London: Routledge; 2nd Edition, 2017. 254 p.
  21. Kashef, M. Technology, and urban form: from the horse-drawn carriage to the information highway. International Journal of Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (IJAEC), vol. 7, no. 1, 2018, pp. 43–49. https://doi.org/10.7492/IJAEC.2018.006
  22. Cervero, R., Kockelman K. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research, Part D, vol. 2, no. 3, 1997, pp. 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
  23. Frank, L., Pivo, G. Impacts of mixed-use and density utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transportation Research Record, no. 1466, 1994, pp. 44–52. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.368.4497&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  24. Manaugh, K., Kreider, T., What is mixed use? Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, vol. 6, no. 1, 2013, pp. 63–72. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v6i1.291
  25. Creswell, J. W. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. 228 p.
  26. Lather, P. Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, vol. 56, no. 3, 1986, pp. 257–277.
  27. Schwanke, D. Mixed-Use Development Handbook. Urban Land Institute; Second Edition, 2003. 414 p.
  28. Grant, J. Mixed Use in Theory and Practice: Canadian Experience with Implementing a Planning Principle. Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 68, no. 1, 2002, pp. 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208977192
  29. Kashef, M. Residential developments in small-town America: Assessment and Regulations. City, Territory, and Architecture, vol. 4, no. 14, 2017, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-017-0070-4
  30. Ewing, R. Can the physical environment determine physical activity levels? Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, vol. 33, no. 2, 2004, pp. 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003677-200504000-00003
  31. Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., Frank, L. D. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literature. Environment and Physical Activity, vol. 25, 2003, pp. 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03
  32. Handy, S. L. Critical assessment of the literature on the relationships among transportation, land use, and physical activity. Prepared for the Committee on Physical Activity, Health, Transportation, and Land Use. Davis: University of California, Department of Environmental Science and Policy, 2005 [online, cited 05.08.2023]. file:///C:/Users/mkarc/Downloads/2005_UCD-ITS-RP-05-67.pdf
  33. Handy, S. L., Paterson, R. G., Butler, K. Planning for street connectivity: getting from here to there. Planning Advisory Service Report 515, American Planning Association, June 2004 [online, cited 06.09.2023]. https://www.cityofshelbyvillein.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Street-Connectivity_PAS_Report_515.pdf
  34. Handy, S. L., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L. The causal influence of neighborhood design on physical activity within the neighborhood: evidence from Northern California. American Journal of Health Promotion, vol. 22, no. 5, 2008, pp. 350–358. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.22.5.350
  35. Kashef, M. W alkability and r esidential suburbs: a multidisciplinary perspective, Journal of Urbanism, vol. 4, no. 1, 2011, pp. 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2011.559955
  36. Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E. Towns and Town-Making Principles. New York: Rizzoli, 1991. 120 p.
  37. Calthorpe, P., Richmond, H. Land use and transportation planning: sustainable growth. In: M. Green (ed.). Changing America: blueprints for the new administration. New York: Newmarket Press, 1992, pp. 699–710.
  38. Katz, P. The New Urbanism: toward an architecture of community. New York: McGraw Hill, 1994. 288 p.
  39. Kelbaugh, D. Common place: toward neighborhood and regional design. University of Washington Press, 1997. 344 p.
  40. Dutton, J. A. New American urbanism: re-forming the suburban metropolis. Milan: Skira Architecture Library, 2000. 250 p.
  41. Kashef, M. Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 5, no. 2, 2016, pp. 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2016.03.003
  42. Handy, S., Boarnet, M., Ewing, R., Killingsworth, R. How the Built Environment Affects Physical Activity: Views from Urban Planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 23, no. 2S, 2002, pp. 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
  43. Saelens, B. E. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: and environment scale evaluation. American Journal of Public Health, vol. 93, no. 9, 2003, pp. 1552–11558. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552
  44. Ewing, R., Cervero, R. Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 76, no. 3, 2010, pp. 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766
  45. Gehrke, S. R., Clifton, K. J. Toward a spatial-temporal measure of land-use mix. The journal of transport and land use. vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, pp. 171–186. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.725
  46. Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk E. Suburban nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline of the American dream. New York: North Point Press, 2000. 320 p.
  47. Calthorpe, P. The next American metropolis: ecology, community and the American dream. Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1993. 176 p.
  48. Kelbaugh, D. Repairing the American Metropolis: Common Place Revisited. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2002. 272 p.
  49. Cervero, R., Murphy, S., Ferrell, C., Goguts, N., Tsai, Y.-H., et al. Transit Oriented Development in America: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects. World Transit Research, Transit Cooperative Research Program, Report 102, June 2004 [online, cited 03.05.2023]. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/23360/transit-oriented-development-in-the-united-states-experiences-challenges-and-prospects
  50. Sung, H., Sugie, L. Sang Hyun, C. Operationalizing Jane Jacobs’s Urban Design Theory: Empirical Verification from the Great City of Seoul, Korea. Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 35, no. 2, 2015, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X14568021
  51. Kockelman, K. M. Travel Behavior as Function of Accessibility, Land Use Mixing, and Land Use Balance Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Record, 1607, no. 1, 1997, p. 116–125. https://doi.org/10.3141/1607-16
  52. Hess, P. M., Moudon, A. V., Logsdon, M. G. Measuring Land Use Patterns for Transportation Research. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1780, no. 1, Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, 2001, pp. 17–24. https://doi.org/10.3141/1780-03
  53. Mavoa, S., Eagleson, S., Badland, H., Gunn, L., Boulangé, C., Stewart, J., & Giles-Corti, B. Identifying appropriate land-use mix measures for use in a national walkability index. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, vol. 11, no. 1, 2018, pp. 681–700. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1132
  54. Hillier, B., Hanson, J. The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press, 1984. 296 p.
  55. Cervero, R. America’s Suburban Centers: The Land Use-transportation Link. Boston: Unwin-Hyman, 1989. 250 p.
  56. Hoppenbrouwer, E., Louw, E. Mixed-use Development: Theory and Practice in Amsterdam’s Eastern Docklands. European Planning Studies, vol. 13, no. 7, 2005, pp. 967–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500242048
  57. Boarnet, M. A Broader Context for Land Use and Travel Behavior, and a Research Agenda. Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 77, no. 3, 2011, pp. 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.593483
  58. Rowley, A. Mixed-use development: Ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking. Planning Practice and Research, vol. 11, no. 1, 1996, pp. 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459650036477
  59. Handy, S., Butler, K., Paterson, R. G. Planning for Street Connectivity - Getting from Here to There, American Planning Association, Chicago, Dec. 2003 [online, cited 25.01.2023]. https://www.planning.org/publications/report/9026848/
  60. Dill, J. Measuring Network Connectivity for Bicycling and Walking. Downloaded on March 20, 2022. Posted on the web by the author as an unedited original paper, 2004 [online, cited 07.12.2022]. http://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/TRB2004-001550.pdf
  61. Grant, J. G ood C ommunity D esign: T he T heory o f t he Public and the Practice of the Private, School of Planning Dalhousie University WORKING PAPER: Trends in the Suburbs Project, August 2010 [online, cited 12.12. 2022]. http://theoryandpractice.planning.dal.ca/_pdf/suburbs/working_papers/grant_10_good%20community%20design.pdf
  62. Choi E., Sara Sardari S. Urban Diversity and Pedestrian Behavior-Refining the Concept of Land-Use Mix for Walkability. Proceedings: Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium, In: M. Greene, J. Reyes and A. Castro (eds.). Santiago de Chile: PUC, 2012, 8073.
  63. Berhie, G., Haq, S. Land Use and Transport Mode Choices: Space Syntax Analysis of American Cities. Enquiry, vol. 14, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17831/enq:arcc.v14i1.429
  64. Ewing, R. H. Best Development Practices: Doing the Right Thing and Making Money at the Same Time, Chicago: American Planning Association, 1996 [online, cited 20.05, 2023]. file:///C:/Users/mkarc/Downloads/Best_ Development_Practices_Doing_the_Right_Thing_a%20(1). pdf
  65. Ewing, R. Presentation at Street Connectivity Workshop. Salt Lake City, UT, 2014.
  66. Frank, L. Schmidt, T. L, Sallis, J. F, Chapman, J, Saelens, B. E. Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: Findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 28, no. 2, 2005, pp.117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
  67. Ellin, N. Postmodern Urbanism. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell, 1995. 368 p.
  68. Taylor, N. Urban planning theory since 1945. London: Sage Publications, 1998. 192 p.
  69. Venturi, R. Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. New York: MoMA, 1966. 136 p.
  70. Rowe, C., Koetter, F. Collage City. Cambridge: MIT, 1978. 192 p.
  71. Gratz, R, B., Mintz, N. Cities: Back from the Edge: New Life for Downtown. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000. 376 p.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2023-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8764 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4333
Language: English
Page range: 188 - 199
Submitted on: May 21, 2023
Accepted on: Oct 23, 2023
Published on: Nov 30, 2023
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Mohamad Kashef, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.