Have a personal or library account? Click to login

A Comparative Analysis of Different Urban Spaces Using Public Space Index

Open Access
|Oct 2023

References

  1. Mehta, V. Evaluating Public Space. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 19, no. 1, 2014, pp. 53–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698
  2. Loukaitou-Sideris, A., Banerjee, T. Urban Design Downtown: Poetics and Politics of Form. Los Angeles: Univ of California Press, 1998. 382 p.
  3. Banerjee, T. The Future of Public Space: Beyond Invented Streets and Reinvented Places. Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 67, no. 1, 2001, pp. 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976352
  4. Worpole, K., Knox, K. The Social Value of Public Spaces Theories and Manifestoes of Contemporary Architecture. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2007, pp. 59–60.
  5. Sorkin, M. Variations on a theme park: The new American city and the end of public space. New York: Hill and Wang, 1992. 252 p.
  6. Evans, J., Evans, S. Z., Morgan, J. D., Snyder, J. A., & Abderhalden, F. P. Evaluating the quality of mid-sized city parks: a replication and extension of the Public Space Index. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 24, no. 1, 2019, pp. 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1411185
  7. Eriawan, T., Setiawati, L. Improving the quality of urban public space through the identification of space utilization index at Imam Bonjol Park, Padang city. In: Green Process, Material, and Energy: A Sustainable Solution for Climate Change. Padang, Indonesia, 2017. p. 40018. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4985514
  8. Montgomery, J. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 3, no. 1, 1998, pp. 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418
  9. Li, J., Dang, A., Song, Y. Defining the ideal public space: A perspective from the publicness. Journal of Urban Management, vol. 11, no. 4, 2022, pp. 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2022.08.005
  10. Jacobs, J. The death and life of great american cities. New York: Vintage Books, 1961. 241 p.
  11. Gehl, J. A changing street life in a changing society. Places, vol. 6, no. 1, 1989, pp. 8–17.
  12. Cook, R. Zoning for Downtown Urban Design : How Cities Control Development. New York: Lexington Books, 1980. 178 p.
  13. Canter, D. The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press, 1977. 198 p.
  14. Punter, J. Participation in the design of urban space. Landscape design, vol. 200, no. 1, 1991, pp. 24–27.
  15. Zamanifard, H., Alizadeh, T., Bosman, C., Coiacetto, E. Measuring experiential qualities of urban public spaces: users’ perspective. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 24, no. 3, 2019, pp. 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1484664
  16. Currie, M. A. A design framework for small parks in ultra-urban, metropolitan, suburban and small town settings. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 22, no. 1, 2017, pp. 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1234334
  17. Forsyth, A., Jacobson, J., Thering, K. Six Assessments of the Same Places: Comparing Views of Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 15, no. 1, 2010, pp. 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800903429274
  18. Ameli, S. H., Hamidi, S., Garfinkel-CASTRO, A., Ewing, R. Do Better Urban Design Qualities Lead to More Walking in Salt Lake City, Utah? Journal of Urban Design, vol. 20, no. 3, 2015, pp. 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1041894
  19. Talavera-Garcia, R., Soria-Lara, J. A. Q-PLOS, developing an alternative walking index. A method based on urban design quality. Cities, vol. 45, 2015, pp. 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.03.003
  20. Ewing, R., Handy, S. Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 14, no. 1, 2009, pp. 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802451155
  21. Hooi, E., Pojani, D. Urban design quality and walkability: an audit of suburban high streets in an Australian city. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 25, no. 1, 2020, pp. 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1554996
  22. De Magalhães, C. Public Space and the Contracting-out of Publicness: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 15, no. 4, 2010, pp. 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502347
  23. Varna, G., Tiesdell, S. Assessing the Publicness of Public Space:The Star Model of Publicness. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 15, no. 4, 2010, pp. 575–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502350
  24. Brighenti, A. The Publicness of Public Space: On the Public Domain. Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, Università degli studi di Trento, 2010 [cited 20.07.2023]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11830069.pdf
  25. Madden, D. J. Revisiting the End of Public Space: Assembling the Public in an Urban Park. City & Community, vol. 9, no. 2, 2010, pp. 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2010.01321.x
  26. Karaçor, E. Public vs. Private: The Evaluation of Different Space Types in Terms of Publicness Dimension. European Journal of Sustainable Development. vol. 5, no. 3, 2016, pp. 51–58. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n3p51
  27. Carmona, M. Contemporary Public Space, Part Two: Classification. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 15, no. 2, 2010, pp. 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574801003638111
  28. Şenik, B., Karaçor, E. Growing Istanbul And Fragmented Landscapes in The Face of Globalization. International Refereed Journal of Architecture and Design, vol. 13, 2018, pp. 24–46. https://doi.org/10.17365/TMD.2018.1.4
  29. Demirkaya, R. Tarihi kentlerde tarihi park ve bahçelerin değerlendirilmesi ve İstanbul örneği. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, 1999 [cited 20.07.2023]. https://polen.itu.edu.tr/items/43f16cbe-3dba-4650-ab7d-4bbc899cadf8
  30. Trancik, R. Finding lost space: theories of urban design. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991. 256 p.
  31. Gehl, J., Gemzoe, L. New city spaces. Copenhagen: The Danish Architectural Press, 2001.
  32. Erkip, F. The Shopping Mall as an Emergent Public Space in Turkey. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 35, no. 6, 2003, pp. 1073–1093. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35167
  33. Roitman, S. Gated communities: definitions, causes and consequences. Urban Design and Planning, vol. 163, no. 1, 2010, pp. 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.2010.163.1.31
  34. Caldeira, T. P. R. City of walls: crime, segregation, and citizenship in São Paulo. California: Univ of California Press, 2001. 473 p.
  35. Mitchell, D. The End of Public Space? People’s Park, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. vol. 85, 1995, pp. 108–133.
  36. Madanipour, A. Public and private spaces of the city. London: Routledge, 2003. 276 p.
  37. Yoon, H., Srinivasan, S. Are They Well Situated? Spatial Analysis of Privately Owned Public Space, Manhattan, New York City. Urban Affairs Review, vol. 51, no. 3, 2014, pp. 358–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414552457
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2023-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8764 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4333
Language: English
Page range: 152 - 163
Submitted on: Jul 21, 2023
Accepted on: Sep 29, 2023
Published on: Oct 18, 2023
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Elif Kutay Karaçor, Hüseyin Ögçe, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.