The Role of Modern Techniques in Preservation of Archaeological Sites
By:
References
- Febro, D. 3D documentation of cultural heritage sites using drone and photogrammetry: A case study of Philippine UNESCO-recognized Baroque churches. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, vol. 11, no. 8, 2020, pp. 1‒14.
- Henderson, J., Lingle, A. M. Preventive conservation in archaeological sites: Uk policy and practice. China Cultural Heritage, no. 2, 2020, pp. 25‒35.
- Rebec, K. M., Deanovič, B., Oostwegel, L. Old buildings need new ideas: Holistic integration of conservation-restoration process data using heritage building information modelling. Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 55, 2022, pp. 30‒42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2022.02.005
- Henderson, J., Lingle, A. M. Preventive conservation in archaeological sites. In López Varela, S. L. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2018, pp. 1‒4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0476
- Haddad, N. A., Fakhoury, L. A., Sakr, Y. M. A critical anthology of international charters, conventions & principles on documentation of cultural heritage for conservation, monitoring & management. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, vol. 21, no. 1, 2021, pp. 291‒310.
- UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2019, Babylon [online, cited 20.05.2022]. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/278/
- Barrile, V., Bilotta, G., Meduri, G. M., De Carlo, D., Nunnari, A. Laser scanner technology, ground-penetrating radar and augmented reality for the survey and recovery of artistic, archaeological and cultural heritage. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. IV-4/W4, 2017, pp. 123‒127. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-123-2017
- Vilbig, J. M., Sagan, V., Bodine, C. Archaeological surveying with airborne LiDAR and UAV photogrammetry: A comparative analysis at Cahokia Mounds. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, vol. 33, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102509
- Grilli, E. Automatic classification of architectural and archaeological 3d data. Alma Mater Studiorum – Università di Bologna, Doctoral dissertation, 2020 [online, cited 20.05.2022]. https://10.6092/unibo/amsdottorato/9347
- Stylianidis, E. Photogrammetric survey for the recording and documentation of historic buildings. Cham: Springer, 2020. 270 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47310-5
- Forte, M., Murteira, H. (eds) Digital cities: Between history and archaeology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020. 368 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190498900.001.0001
- Roca, P., Lourenço, P. B., Gaetani, A.Historic Construction and Conservation: Materials, Systems and Damage. New York: Routledge, 2019. 366 p. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429052767
- Zhang, Y., Dong, W. Determining minimum intervention in the preservation of heritage buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, vol. 15, no. 5, 2021, pp. 698‒712. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1645237
- Abdo, M., Mohamed, F. O., Orabi, A. F. Theory vs practice, transforming new cities into smart ones. A case study on the city of new Minia. Journal of Advanced Engineering Trends, vol. 41, no. 2, 2021, pp. 219‒245. https://doi.org/10.21608/jaet.2021.66385.1094
- Jordan-Palomar, I., Tzortzopoulos, P., García-Valldecabres, J., Pellicer, E. Protocol to manage heritage-building interventions using heritage building information modelling (HBIM). Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 4, 2018, p. 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040908
- Akhter, H., Promei, N. The methods and recent invented tools and techniques used in archaeology for delicately preserving the past for the future. Archaeological Discovery, vol. 6, no. 4, 2018, pp. 338‒354. https://doi.org/10.4236/ad.2018.64017
- Leucci, G. Nondestructive testing for archaeology and cultural heritage. Cham: Springer, 2019. 241 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01899-3
- Saaty, T., Tavana, M. The encyclicon ‒ Volume 4: A dictionary of complex decisions using the analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 2021. 919 p.
- Rasol, M., Pérez-Gracia, V., Fernandes, F. M., Pais, J. C., Santos-Assunçao, S., Roberts, J. S. Ground penetrating radar system: Principles. In: S. D’Amico and V. Venuti (eds.), Handbook of Cultural Heritage Analysis. Cham: Springer, 2022, pp. 705‒738. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60016-7_25
- Elfadaly, A., Lasaponara, R. On the use of satellite imagery and gis tools to detect and characterize the urbanization around heritage sites: The case studies of the Catacombs of Mustafa Kamel in Alexandria, Egypt and the Aragonese castle in Baia, Italy. Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 7, 2019, p. 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072110
- Gallozzi, A., Senatore, L. J., Strollo, R. M. An overview on robotic applications for cultural heritage and built cultural heritage. SCIRES-IT SCIentific RESearch and Information Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, 2019, pp. 47‒56. https://doi.org/10.2423/i22394303v9n2p47
- Piroddi, L., Calcina, S. V., Trogu, A., Ranieri, G. Automated resistivity profiling (ARP) to explore wide archaeological areas: The prehistoric site of Mont’e Prama, Sardinia, Italy. Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 3, 2020, p. 461. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030461
- Dabbs, M. Spotlight: Magnetometry and resistivity, 2014 [online, cited 20.05.2022]. https://blogs.kent.ac.uk/digthewolds/2014/09/13/13914-spotlight-magnetometry-and-resistivity/
- Biagetti, S., Alcaina-Mateos, J., Ruiz-Giralt, A., Lancelotti, C., Groenewald, P., Ibañez-Insa, J., Gur-Arie, S., Morton, F., Merlo, S. Identifying anthropogenic features at Seoke (BOTSWANA) using pXRF: Expanding the record of southern african stone walled sites. PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 5, 2021, p. e0250776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250776
- Advantages and disadvantages of lidar [online, cited 20.05.2022]. https://lidarradar.com/info/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-lidar
- Webb, E. K., Robson, S., MacDonald, L., Garside, D., Evans, R. Spectral and 3d cultural heritage documentation using a modified camera. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLII-2, 2018, pp. 1183‒1190. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-1183-2018
- Oseni, A. E., Durowoju, A. S. Application of GIS in electricity distribution: A case study of part of Ashamu Layout Kosobo, Oyo east local government area, Oyo state Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, 2020, pp. 370‒381. https://doi.org/10.36263/nijest.2020.02.0106
- Blaha, J., Novotny, J. Report assessing innovative restoration techniques, technologies and materials used in conservation, 2018 [online, cited 20.05.2022]. https://www.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/D.T1.3.1-Report-innovative-techniques-technologies-materials.pdf
- Dario, C. A method to obtain precise determinations of relative humidity using thin film capacitive sensors under normal or extreme humidity conditions. Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 37, May-June 2019, pp. 166‒169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.11.003
- Themistocleous, K., Danezis, C., Gikas, V. Monitoring ground deformation of cultural heritage sites using sar and geodetic techniques: The case study of Choirokoitia, Cyprus. Applied Geomatics, vol. 13, no. 1, 2021, pp. 37‒49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-020-00329-0
- Mazzaglia, A. The information system of pompeii sustainable preservation project. A tool for the collection, management and sharing of knowledge useful for conservation and renovation of archaeological monuments. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, vol. 10, no. 1, 2021, p. 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021010014
- Cabello-Briones, C., Prieto, A. J., Ortiz, P. Determination of the technical suitability of shelters for archaeological sites using fuzzy logic. Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 48, March-April 2021, pp. 211‒226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.11.006
- Little, C., Bec, A., Moyle, B. D., Patterson, D. Innovative methods for heritage tourism experiences: creating windows into the past. Journal of Heritage Tourism, vol. 15, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1‒13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2018.1536709
- Ivanova, B., Vassilev, T. A m ixed r eality a pproach t o visualizing cultural heritage artefacts: Mixed reality approach to cultural heritage, International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies ‘21: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021, pp. 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472410.3472432
- Heidentor [online, cited 20.05.2022]. https://engineeringandarchitecture.com/heidentor/
- Colucci, E., De Ruvo, V., Lingua, A., Matrone, F., Rizzo, G. HBIM-GIS integration: From IFC to CityGML standard for damaged cultural heritage in a multiscale 3D GIS. Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 4, 2020, p. 1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041356
Language: English
Page range: 131 - 141
Submitted on: May 26, 2022
Accepted on: Jul 17, 2023
Published on: Sep 16, 2023
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2023 Mahmood Chabuk, Shatha Al-Amiri, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.