References
- 1. Thie, J. Canada Geographic Information System (CGIS). In: Kemp, K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Science. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California. 2008, p. 19. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412953962.n11
- 2. Ganapati, S. Uses of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems Applications in E-Government. Public Administration Review, vol. 71, no. 3, 2011, pp. 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02226.x
- 3. Brown, G., Reed, P., Raymond, C. M. Mapping place values: 10 lessons from two decades of public participation GIS empirical research. Applied Geography, vol. 116, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102156
- 4. About Participatory Mapping, 2020 [online]. International Society of Participatory Mapping [cited 5.10.2021]. https://pmappingsociety.mn.co/
- 5. Brown, G., Kyttä, M. Key issues and priorities in participatory mapping: Toward integration or increased specialization? Applied Geography, vol. 95, 2018, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.002
- 6. Pánek, J. From Mental Maps to GeoParticipation. The Cartographic Journal, vol. 53, no. 4, 2016, pp. 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2016.1243862
- 7. Zhang, S. Public participation in the Geoweb era: Defining a typology for geo-participation in local governments. Cities, vol. 85, 2019, pp. 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.004
- 8. Sieber, R. Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 96, no. 3, 2006, pp. 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x
- 9. Kahila-Tani, M., Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., Tyger, T. Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process. Planning Practice & Research, vol. 31, no. 2, 2016, pp. 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2015.1104203
- 10. Bugs, G. Assessment of Online PPGIS Study Cases in Urban Planning. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, A. A. C. (eds.) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2012, pp. 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31125-3_36
- 11. Jankowski, P. Towards participatory geographic information systems for community-based environmental decision making. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 90, no. 6, 2009, pp. 1966–1971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.028
- 12. Brown, G. G., Donovan, S. Escaping the National Forest Planning Quagmire: Using Public Participation GIS to Assess Acceptable National Forest Use. Journal of Forestry, vol. 111, no. 2, 2013, pp. 115–125. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.12-087
- 13. Kivinen, S., Vartiainen, K., Kumpula, T. People and Post- Mining Environments: PPGIS Mapping of Landscape Values, Knowledge Needs, and Future Perspectives in Northern Finland. Land, 2018, vol. 7, no. 4, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040151
- 14. Farhadpour, S., Hosseinali, F. Public Participation in GIS via Mobile Applications for Crisis Management Process: a Case Study of an Earthquake, Teheran, Iran. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLII-4/W18, 2019, pp. 387–393. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-387-2019
- 15. Brown, G., Kyttä, M. Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, vol. 46, 2014, pp. 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004
- 16. Tulloch, D. Public Participation GIS (PPGIS). In: Kemp. K. K. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Science. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California. 2008, pp. 352–354. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412953962.n165
- 17. Kahila-Tani, M., Kyttä, M., Geertman, S. Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices. Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 186, 2019, pp. 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.019
- 18. Rzeszewski, M., Kotus, J. Usability and usefulness of internet mapping platforms in participatory spatial planning. Applied Geography, vol. 103, 2019, pp. 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.01.001
- 19. Pánek, J., Pásztó, V., Burian, J., Bakule, J., Lysek, J. What is the current state of geoparticipation in Czech municipalities? GeoScape, vol. 15, no. 1, 2021, pp. 90–103. https://doi.org/10.2478/geosc-2021-0008
- 20. Kotus, J., Sowada, T., Rzeszewski, M., Mańkowska, P. A natomy o f P lace-Making i n t he C ontext o f t he Communication Processes: A Story of one Community and one Square in a Post-Socialist City. Quaestiones Geographicae, vol. 38, no. 2, 2019, pp. 51–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-0015
- 21. Lorens, P., Kamrowska-Zaluska, D. Spurring the community involvement in planning - lessons from post-socialist cities. 49th ISOCARP Congress: Frontier of planning – evolving and declining models of city planning practice, 2013, pp. 1–6.
- 22. Kaczmarek, T., Wójcicki, M. Participation in Public Consultations on Spatial Planning Documents. The Case of Poznań City. Quaestiones Geographicae, vol. 35, no. 2, 2016, pp. 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1515/quageo-2016-0016
- 23. Poljak Istenič, S., Kozina, J. Participatory Planning in a Post-socialist Urban Context: Experience from Five Cities in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Nared, J., Bole, D. (eds.) Participatory Research and Planning in Practice. The Urban book series. Springer, Cham. 2020, pp. 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28014-7_3
- 24. Golovátina-Mora, P., Zelenskaia, E., Golovatina, V., Celiński, P., Mora, R. A. The meaning of post-: Participatory urbanism in Lublin, Pilsen, and Yekaterinburg. Belgeo, no. 4, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.30464
- 25. Bąkowska-Waldmann, E., Kaczmarek, T. The Use of PPGIS: Towards Reaching a Meaningful Public Participation in Spatial Planning. ISPRS International Journal of Geo- Information, vol. 10, no. 9, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10090581
- 26. Stafecka, L., Frīdenberga, A., Tarasova, S. Sabiedrības līdzdalība pašvaldību attīstības plānošanas dokumentu izstrādē: Latvijas pašvaldību prakses izvērtējums, 2020 [online, cited 1.11.2021]. https://providus.lv/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Providus_Sabiedribas_lidzdaliba_pasvaldibu_planosana_2020.pdf
- 27. IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation, 2018 [online]. IAP2 International Federation [cited 20.08.2020]. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/Spectrum_8.5x11_Print.pdf
- 28. Noteikumi par pašvaldību teritorijas attīstības plānošanas dokumentiem, 2014 [online, cited 17.02.2022]. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/269842
- 29. Teritorijas attīstības plānošanas likums, 2011 [online, cited 10.02.2022]. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/238807
- 30. Teritorijas attīstības plānošanas informācijas sistēma (TAPIS), 2021 [online]. Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija [cited 25.04.2021]. https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/teritorijas-attistibas-planosanas-informacijas-sistema-tapis
- 31. Daugavpils novada Ģeogrāfiskās informācijas sistēmas pārlūks [online]. Daugavpils novada dome [cited 9.05.2021]. http://gis.daugavpilsnovads.lv/
- 32. Interaktīvā karte [online]. Kuldīgas attīstības aģentūra [cited 25.04.2021]. https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=b4116c85293746fba2b3b6b0f5ceaca2
- 33. Daugavpils pilsētas industriālo zonu 3D realitātes modelis, 2019 [online]. Daugavpils novada dome [cited 25.04.2021]. http://3dpilseta.daugavpils.lv/industr_zones/
- 34. Projekta ietvaros izveidots industriālo zonu 3D modelis, 2019 [online]. Daugavpils novada dome [cited 25.04.2021]. https://www.daugavpils.lv/pasvaldiba/aktualitates/zinas/projekta-ietvaros-izveidots-industrialo-zonu-3d-modelis
- 35. Par Jūrmalas pilsētas teritorijas plānojuma grozījumu izstrādi, 2019 [online]. SIA Metrum [cited 25.04.2021]. https://metrum.lv/lv/jaunumi---publikacijas/jaunumi/?id=406
- 36. Kuldīgas vecpilsētas lokālplānojuma interaktīvā karte, 2019 [online]. SIA Metrum [cited 25.04.2021]. http://kuldiga.tergis.lv/#/lv/dashboard
- 37. Interneta platforma problēmu un situācijas apzināšanai, kā arī priekšlikumu iesniegšanai projektam “Lokālplānojums Rīgas Tehniskās universitātes kompleksam Ķīpsalā kā Rīgas vēsturiskā centra un tā aizsardzības zonas teritorijas plānojuma grozījumi,” 2021 [online]. SIA Metrum [cited 25.04.2021]. http://kipsala.tergis.lv/#/lv/dashboard
- 38. Priekšlikumi Kuldīgas novada teritorijas attīstības plānošanas dokumentu izstrādei, 2021 [online]. Kuldīgas novada pašvaldība [cited 02.12.2021]. https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/5a138d927c3b4fca9cbefaa241371998
- 39. Ruskule, A., Štube, M., Vinogradovs, I., Veidemane, K. Application of ArcGIS online tools for stakeholder involvement and decision support in addressing land-sea interactions: Southwestern Kurzeme case study, 2021 [online, cited 9.05.2021]. https://www.gisbaltic.eu/content/dam/distributor-restricted/gisbaltic-eu/beuc2020/beuc-pdf%60s/9-beuc-day1-anda-ruskule.pdf
- 40. LAND-SEA-ACT karšu pārlūks [online]. Baltijas Vides Forums [cited 9.05.2021]. https://experience.arcgis.com/
- 41. Ziņojumu karte [online]. Jelgavas pilsētas dome [cited 9.05.2021]. https://karte.jelgava.lv/reporting
- 42. Sabiedrības integrācija Rīgā, 2017 [online]. SIA „TNS Latvia” [cited 11.02.2022]. https://sus.lv/sites/default/files/media/faili/sabiedribas_integracija_riga_2017.pdf