References
- 1. Hurtienne, J., Klöckner, K., Diefenbach, S., Nass, C., Maier, A. Designing with image schemas: resolving the tension between innovation, inclusion and intuitive use. Interacting with Computers, vol. 27, no. 3, 2015, pp. 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu04910.1093/iwc/iwu049
- 2. O’Brien, M., Rogers, W., Fisk, A. Developing an Organizational Model for Intuitive Design. Technical report HFA-TR-1001. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010. 133 p.
- 3. Crilly, N., Maier, A. M., Clarkson, P. J. Representing artefacts as media: Modelling the relationship between designer intent and consumer experience. International Journal of Design, vol. 2, no. 3, 2008, pp. 15–27.
- 4. Blackler, A., Hurtienne, J. Towards a unified view of intuitive interaction: definitions, models and tools across the world. MMI Interaktiv, vol. 13, 2007, pp. 36–54. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/19116/
- 5. Muehlbauer, M., Burry, J., Song, A. Automated shape design by grammatical evolution. International Conference on Evolutionary and Biologically Inspired Music and Art, EvoMUSART 2017: Computational Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and Design, 2017, pp. 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55750-2_1510.1007/978-3-319-55750-2_15
- 6. Liu, K., Zeng, X., Wang, J., Tao, X., Xu, J., Jiang, X., Ren, J., Kamalha, E., Agrawal, T. K., Bruniaux, P. Parametric design of garment flat based on body dimension. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 65, 2018, pp. 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2018.01.01310.1016/j.ergon.2018.01.013
- 7. Alcaide-Marzal, J., Diego-Mas, J.A., Acosta-Zazueta, G. A 3D shape generative method for aesthetic product design. Design Studies, vol. 66, 2020, pp. 144–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.00310.1016/j.destud.2019.11.003
- 8. Preiser, W. F. E., Smith, K. H. Universal design at the urban scale. In W. F. E. Preiser and K. H. Smith eds., Universal Design Handbook, New York: McGraw-Hill Education, 2010, pp. 20.1–20.8.
- 9. Cartiere, C., Willis, S. The Practice of Public Art. London: Routledge, 2008. 288 p.10.4324/9780203926673
- 10. Humphries, T. Considering Intuition in the Context of Design, and of Psychology. WIRAD’s 2nd Emerging Researchers Symposium May 2012, Cardiff School of Art and Design, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Wales, 2012. 10 p.
- 11. Hodgkinson, G., Langan-Fox, J., Sadler-Smith, E. Intuition: A fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural sciences. British Journal of Psychology, vol. 99, no. 1, 2008, pp. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X21666610.1348/000712607X216666
- 12. Mortensen, D. How to Create an Intuitive Design, 2017 [online]. The interaction Design Foundation [cited 07.07.2021]. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/how-to-create-an-intuitive-design.
- 13. Harte, R., Glynn, L., Rodríguez-Molinero, A., Baker, P. M., Scharf, T., Quinlan, L. R., ÓLaighin, G. A Human-Centered Design Methodology to Enhance the Usability, Human Factors, and User Experience of Connected Health Systems: A Three-Phase Methodology. JMIR Human Factors, vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, pp. E8. https://doi.org/10.2196/humanfactors.544310.2196/humanfactors.5443
- 14. Klein, G. Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998. 352 p.
- 15. Le Doux, J. E. The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996. 384 p.
- 16. Damasio, A. R. The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Vintage, 1999. 400 p.
- 17. Baker, C. L., Saxe, R., Tenenbaum, J. B. Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition, vol. 113, no. 3, 2009, pp. 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.00510.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.005
- 18. Wellman, H. M. The Child’s Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1992. 358 p.
- 19. Glenberg, A., Havas, D., Becker, R. Rinck, M. Grounding Language in Bodily States: The Case for Emotion. In D. Pecher and R. A. Zwaan eds., Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking, Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 2010, pp. 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499968.00610.1017/CBO9780511499968.006
- 20. Gibson, J. J. The perception of the visual world. Cambridge: The Riverside press, 1950.
- 21. Chalmers, D. The Conscious Mind. In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. 433 p.
- 22. Levine, J. Materialism and Qualia: the Explanatory Gap. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 64, 1983, pp. 354–361.10.1111/j.1468-0114.1983.tb00207.x
- 23. Metzinger, T. Being No One. The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003. 714 p.10.7551/mitpress/1551.001.0001
- 24. Chatterjee, A. The neuropsychology of visual artists. Neuropsychologia, vol. 42, no. 11, 2004, pp. 1568-1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.03.01110.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.03.011
- 25. Silver, D., Hubert, T., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Lai, M., Guez, A., Lanctot, M., Sifre, L., Kumaran, D., Graepel, T., Lillicrap, T. Mastering chess and shogi by self-play with a general reinforcement learning algorithm, 2017 [online]. Cornell University [cited 07.07.2021]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01815
- 26. Metzinger, T. The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind and the Myth of the Self. New York: Basic Books, 2009. 291 p.
- 27. Lacoff, G., Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. 333 p.
- 28. Ehrsson, H. H. The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science, vol. 317, no. 5841, 2007, pp.1048–1048. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.114217510.1126/science.1142175
- 29. Gerstenberg, T., Tenenbaum, J. Intuitive Theories. In M. R. Waldman ed., The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 515–548. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399550.013.2810.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399550.013.28
- 30. Battaglia, P. W., Hamrick, J. B., Tenenbaum, J. B. Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, no. 45, 2013, pp. 18327–18332. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.130657211010.1073/pnas.1306572110
- 31. Žukas, J. Harmonisation of an aesthetic shape from the perspective of intuitive cognition. Dissertation, Vilnius tech, 2021. https://doi.org/10.20334/2021-031-M10.20334/2021-031-M
- 32. Harman, G. On the Horror of Phenomenology: Lovecraft and Husserl. In R. Mackay ed., Collapse IV: Philosophical research and development, 2008, pp. 333–364.
- 33. Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., Hubert, T., Baker, L., Lai, M., Bolton, A., Chen, Y. Mastering the game of go without human knowledge. Nature, vol. 550, 2017, pp. 354–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature2427010.1038/nature24270
- 34. McGinn, C. Basic Structures of Reality: Essays in Meta-Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. 256 p.
- 35. Shepherd, S. Perception: Exploring Cognition and Consciousness Through Visual Art. Mahurin Honors College Capstone Experience / Thesis Projects, paper 819, 2019 [cited 07.07.2021]. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/stu_hon_theses/819
- 36. Žukas, J. Experimental harmonization of shape intuitive interaction. Architecture and Urban Planning, vol. 16, no. 1, 2020, pp. 72–77. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-001110.2478/aup-2020-0011
- 37. Dotson, J. P., Beltramo, M. A., Feit, E. M., Smith, R. C. Modeling the Effect of Images on Product Choices, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.228257010.2139/ssrn.2282570
- 38. Kang, N., Ren, Y. Feinberg, F.M., Papalambros, P. Form+Function: Optimizing Aesthetic Product Design via Adaptive, Geometrized Preference Elicitation. Michigan: University of Michigan, 2016. 71 p.
- 39. Kreuzbauer, R., Malter, A. J. Embodied cognition and new product design: Changing product form to influence brand categorization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 22, no. 2, 2005, pp. 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00112.x10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00112.x
- 40. Ranscombe, C., Hicks, B., Mullineux, G., Singh, B. Visually decomposing vehicle images: Exploring the influence of different aesthetic features on consumer perception of brand. Design Studies, vol. 33, no. 4, 2012, pp. 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.00610.1016/j.destud.2011.06.006
- 41. Barsalou, L. W. Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, vol. 22, no. 4, 1999, pp. 577–609. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X9900214910.1017/S0140525X99002149
- 42. Frensch, P. A., Schwarzer, R. Cognition and Neuropsychology: International Perspectives on Psychological Science (Vol. 1). London: Psychology Press, 2010. 304 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/978020384582010.4324/9780203845820