References
- 1. Jayakody, R. R. J. C., Amaratunga, D., Haigh, R. Plan and design public open spaces incorporating disaster management strategies with sustainable development strategies: a literature synthesis. MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 229, 2018, 04001. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20182290400110.1051/matecconf/201822904001
- 2. Tan, P. Y., Jim, C. Y. (Eds.). Greening Cities. Springer Singapore, 2017. 372 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4113-610.1007/978-981-10-4113-6
- 3. French, E. L., Birchall, S. J., Landman, K., Brown, R. D. Designing public open space to support seismic resilience: A systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 34, 2019, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.00110.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.001
- 4. Tidball, K. G., Krasny, M. E., Svendsen, E., Campbell, L., Helphand, K. Stewardship, learning, and memory in disaster resilience. Environmental Education Research, vol. 16, no. 5-6, 2010, pp. 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.50543710.1080/13504622.2010.505437
- 5. Nakabayashi, I. Urban planning based on disaster risk assessment. In: Disaster Management in Metropolitan Areas for the 21st Century, Proceedings of the IDNDR Aichi/Nagoya International Conference, 1-4 November, 1994, Nagoya, Japan, UNCRD Proceedings Series, No. 1. Nagoya, Japan: United Nations Centre for Regional Development, pp. 225–239.
- 6. Wesener, A. Growing resilient cities: Urban community gardens and disaster recovery after the 2010/11 Canterbury/Christchurch earthquakes. In D. Brantz, A. Sharma eds. Urban resilience in a global context: Actors, Narratives and Temporalities, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2020, pp. 77–101. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839450185-00510.14361/9783839450185-005
- 7. Wei, Y., Jin, L., Xu, M., Pan, S., Xu, Y., Zhang, Y. Instructions for planning emergency shelters and open spaces in China: Lessons from global experiences and expertise. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 51, 2020, 101813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.10181310.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101813
- 8. Brantz, D., Sharma, A. (Eds.). Urban Resilience in a Global Context: Actors, Narratives, and Temporalities. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2020. 250 p. https://doi.org/10.14361/978383945018510.14361/9783839450185
- 9. Allan, P., Bryant, M., Wirsching, C., Garcia, D., Rodriguez, M. T. The influence of urban morphology on the resilience of cities following an earthquake. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 18, no. 2, 2013, pp. 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.77288110.1080/13574809.2013.772881
- 10. Winandari, M. I. R. Public open space for disaster mitigation in Tangerang housing estates. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 106, 2018, 012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/106/1/01202110.1088/1755-1315/106/1/012021
- 11. Ishikawa, M. Landscape planning for a safe city. Annals of Geophysics, vol. 45, no. 6, 2002. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-354410.4401/ag-3544
- 12. Nira, R. More Parks Can Lessen the Blow of Earthquakes, 2019 [online]. Texas A & M Today [cited 17.06.2021]. https://today.tamu.edu/2019/08/13/more-parks-can-lessen-the-blow-of-earthquakes/
- 13. Koren, D., Rus, K. The potential of open space for enhancing urban seismic resilience: A literature review. Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 21, 2019, 5942. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1121594210.3390/su11215942
- 14. Brand, D., Nicholson, H. Public space and recovery: learning from post-earthquake Christchurch. Journal of Urban Design, vol. 21, no. 2, 2016, pp. 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.113323110.1080/13574809.2015.1133231
- 15. Chan, J., Dubois, B., Tidball, K. G. Refuges of local resilience: Community gardens in post-Sandy New York City. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 14, no. 3, 2015, pp. 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.00510.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.005
- 16. Dionisio, M. R., Kingham, S., Banwell, K., Neville, J. Geospatial tools for community engagement in the Christchurch rebuild, New Zealand. Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 27, 2016, pp. 233–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.00710.1016/j.scs.2016.04.007
- 17. Shiozaki, Y., Nishikava, E., Deguchi, T. (Eds.). Büyük Hanshin Depreminden Alınan Dersler. Istanbul: Istanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Basımevi, 2006, 123 p.
- 18. Allan, P., Bryant, M. The critical role of open space in earthquake recovery: a case study. In: EN: Proceedings of the 2010 NZSEE Conference, 2010, New Zealand, 2010, pp. 1–10.
- 19. Coburn, A., Spence, R. Earthquake protection, 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002. 424 p. https://doi.org/10.1002/047085518510.1002/0470855185
- 20. Sariçam, S. Kentsel Açik-Yeşil Alanlarin Afet Sonrasi İşlevleri. GSI Journals Serie B: Advancements in Business and Economics, vol. 2, no. 1, 2019, pp. 1–15.
- 21. Mexico City earthquake of 1985 [online]. Britannica [cited 17.06.2021]. https://www.britannica.com/event/Mexico-City-earthquake-of-1985
- 22. Nakase, I., Fujimoto, M., Akazawa, H., Mizuno, Y. Park and greenery forms through participation of local residents after Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake (Report). Nature and Human activities, 2000, vol. 5, pp. 41–46. https://www.hitohaku.jp/publication/r-bulletin/Nature%20and%20Human%20Activities%20No.05%202000%20041-046%20optimized.pdf
- 23. Aksoy, Y., Turan, A., C., Atalay, H. İstanbul Fatih ilçesi yeşil alan yeterliliğinin Marmara depremi öncesi ve sonrası değerleri kullanılarak incelenmesi. Uludağ University Journal of The Faculty of Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, 2009, 137–150. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/202722
- 24. BBC NEWS, 2019 [cited 17.06.2021]. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-49935494
- 25. Ogawa, N. Disascape to Preemptive Landscape: Resilient Parks for Earthquake Disaster Management. University of Georgia, Athens, GA. Master Thesis, 2014.
- 26. León, J., March, A. Urban morphology as a tool for supporting tsunami rapid resilience: A case study of Talcahuano, Chile. Habitat international, vol. 43, 2014, pp. 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.00610.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.006
- 27. The Sphere Project. Humanitarian Charter and Minumum Standarts in Humanitarian Response, 2011 [online 17.05.2021]. https://www.unhcr.org/50b491b09.pdf https://doi.org/10.3362/978190817620210.3362/9781908176202
- 28. Akdur, R. Afetlere Hazırlık ve Afet Yönetimi. S. Esin, T. Oğuzhan, K. Kaya, T. Ergüder, 2001 [cited 17.05.2021]. https://www.recepakdur.com/media/1295/09-akdur-r-afetlere-hazirlik-ve-afet-yo-netimi-sayfa-1-38.pdf
- 29. Xu, J., Yin, X., Chen, D., An, Y., Nie, G. Multi-criteria location model of earthquake evacuation shelters to aid in urban planning. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 20, 2016, pp. 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.00910.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.009
- 30. Vanvactor, J. D. Strategic health care logistics planning in emergency management. Disaster Prevention and Management, vol. 21, no. 3, 2012, pp. 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/0965356121123448010.1108/09653561211234480
- 31. Koçan, N., Sürün, S. 1. Derece Deprem Kuşağında Yer Alan Balıkesir-Burhaniye Kenti İçin Deprem Parkı Önerisi. Nevşehir Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, vol. 9, 2020, pp. 14–31. https://doi.org/10.17100/nevbiltek.68133610.17100/nevbiltek.681336
- 32. Nedjati, A., Vizvari, B., Izbirak, G. Post-earthquake response by small UAV helicopters. Natural Hazards, vol. 80, 2016, pp. 1669–1688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2046-610.1007/s11069-015-2046-6
- 33. Mazereeuw, M., Yarina, E. Emergency preparedness hub: Designing decentralized systems for disaster resilience. Journal of Architectural Education, vol. 71, no. 1, 2017, pp. 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.2017.126092810.1080/10464883.2017.1260928
- 34. Çelik, A., Ender, E. Design Principles of Earthquake Park. In R. Efe, I. Cürebal, A. Gad, B. Tóth eds. Environmental Sustainability and Landscape Management. Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press, 2016, pp. 735–741.
- 35. Masuda, N. Disaster refuge and relief urban park system in Japan. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, vol. 2, no. 4, 2014, pp. 52–60.
- 36. Önal, S. Kent Parklarda Kullanılan Donatıların Standartlara Uygunluğunun Belirlenmesi: Ankara Örneği. Antropoloji, vol. 38, 2019, pp. 54–64. https://doi.org/10.33613/antropolojidergisi.63341110.33613/antropolojidergisi.633411
- 37. Mumcu, S., Yilmaz, S. Seating furniture in open spaces and their contribution to the social life. In R. Efe, I. Cürebal, A. Gad, B. Tóth eds. Environmental Sustainability and Landscape Management. Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press, 2016, pp. 169–187.
- 38. Yücel, G. Earthquake and evacuation area assessment for Istanbul Avcılar district. Disaster Science and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, 2018, pp. 65–79.
- 39. Dönmez, Y. Investigation of Active Green Spaces within the Criterion of Earthquake Park Concept: Case Study of Safranbolu City. In R. Efe, I. Cürebal, A. Gad, B. Tóth eds. Environmental Sustainability and Landscape Management. Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press, 2016, pp. 585–591.
- 40. Okuyama, M. Recovery from Earthquake for Children (in Japanese), 2021 [online]. Child research net [cited 17.06.2021]. http://www.blog.crn.or.jp/lab/06/15.html
- 41. Kinoshita, I., Woolley, H. Children’s play environment after a disaster: The great East Japan earthquake. Children, vol. 2, no. 1, 2015, pp. 39–62. https://doi.org/10.3390/children201003910.3390/children2010039
- 42. Fire Resistant Plants for Chelan/Douglas County Washington. Master Gardener Program, 2017 [cited 17.06.2021]. https://s3.wp.wsu.edu/uploads/sites/2086/2018/01/fireresistantplants2017.pdf
- 43. Çoban, M., Sözbilir, M., Göktaş, Y. Deprem deneyimini yaşamış kişilerin deprem öncesi hazırlık algılarının belirlenmesi: Bir durum çalışması. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 37, 2017, pp. 113–134. https://doi.org/10.17295/ataunidcd.28172110.17295/ataunidcd.281721
- 44. Özkir, A. Kent Parkları Yönetim Modelinin Geliştirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı, Doctoral Thesis, 2007. https://dspace.ankara.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/20.500.12575/34072
- 45. Deniz Gezmiş Parkı, 2021 [online]. Ladin [cited 17.06.2021]. http://www.ladin.gen.tr/project/deniz-gezmis-parki
- 46. IBB, 2021 [online, cited: 17.06.2021]. https://www.ibb.istanbul/News/Detail/37124
- 47. Kurt Konakoğlu, S. S., Çelik, K. T. Afet ve Acil Durum Toplanma Alanı Olarak Belirlenen Parkların Deprem Parkı Olabilirliklerinin Amasya Kenti Örneğinde Değerlendirilmesi. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, vol. 7, no. 81, 2021, pp. 1740–1755. https://doi.org/10.26449/sssj.309210.26449/sssj.3092
- 48. Villagra-Islas, P., Alves, S. Open space and their attributes, uses and restorative qualities in an earthquake emergency scenario: The case of Concepción, Chile. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 19, 2016, pp. 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.01710.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.017
- 49. Buldurur, M. A., Kurucu, H. İstanbul’da Afet Yönetimi ve Acil Ulaşım Yollarının Değerlendirmesi. Planlama Dergisi, vol. 25, no. 1, 2015, pp. 21–31. https://doi.org/10.5505/planlama.2015.4796510.5505/planlama.2015.47965
- 50. Bryant, M., Allan, P. Open space innovation in earthquake affected cities. In Earthquake Affected Cities, Approaches to Disaster Management - Examining the Implications of Hazards, Emergencies and Disasters, John Tiefenbacher, IntechOpen, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5772/5546510.5772/55465