Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Experimental Harmonization of Shape Intuitive Interaction Cover

Experimental Harmonization of Shape Intuitive Interaction

By: Jonas Žukas  
Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. 1. Barber, J., Frankel, F. H., Kihlstrom, J. F. In Memoriam Dr. Kenneth S. Bowers (1937–1996). International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, No. 44, 1996, pp. 284–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020714960841609010.1080/00207149608416090
  2. 2. Bowers, S. K., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., Parker, K. Intuition in the Context of Discovery. Cognitive psychology, Vol. 22, Issue 1, 1990, pp. 72–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(90)90004-N10.1016/0010-0285(90)90004-N
  3. 3. Gibson, J. J. The perception of the visual world. Cambridge: The Riverside press, 1950. 235 p.
  4. 4. Gerstenberg, T., Tenenbaum, J. Intuitive Theories. The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning [In: Michael R. Waldmann ed.]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 515–548. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399550.013.2810.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399550.013.28
  5. 5. Battaglia, P. W., Hamrick, J. B., Tenenbaum, J. B. Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 110, No. 45, 2013, pp. 18327–18332. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.130657211010.1073/pnas.1306572110
  6. 6. Baker, C. L., Saxe, R., Tenenbaum, J. B. Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition, Vol. 113, No. 3, 2009, pp. 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.00510.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.005
  7. 7. Wellman, H. M. The child’s theory of mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1992. 358 p.
  8. 8. Klein, G. A. Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998. 360 p.
  9. 9. LeDoux, J. E. The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996. 384 p.
  10. 10. Damasio, A. R. The feeling of what happens: Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Vintage, 1999. 400 p.
  11. 11. Gibson, J. J. Observations on active touch. Psychological review, Vol. 69, No. 6, 1962, pp. 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/h004696210.1037/h0046962
  12. 12. Kirsh, D., Maglio, P. On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive science, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1994, pp. 513–549. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1804_110.1207/s15516709cog1804_1
  13. 13. Glenberg, A., Kaschak, M. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2002, pp. 558–565. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF0319631310.3758/BF03196313
  14. 14. Glenberg, A., Havas, D., Becker, R., & Rinck, M. Grounding Language in Bodily States: The Case for Emotion [In: D. Pecher and R. Zwaan Eds., Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2005, pp. 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499968.00610.1017/CBO9780511499968.006
  15. 15. Barsalou, L. W. Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1999, pp. 577–609. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X9900214910.1017/S0140525X99002149
  16. 16. Trends in Universal Design: An anthology with global perspectives, theoretical aspects and real world examples. Norwegian Directorate for Children, Youth and Family Affairs, 2013.
  17. 17. Universal Design 2016: Learning from the Past, Designing for the Future [H. Petrie, J. Darzentas, T. Walsh, D. Swallow, L.Sandoval, A. Lewis, Ch. Power eds.]. Studies in health technology and informatics, Vol. 229, New York: IOS Press, 2016. 704 p.
  18. 18. Steinfeld, E., Maisel, J. Universal Design: creating inclusive environments, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2012. 408 p.
  19. 19. Goals, Global Universal Design Commission [online, cited 20.02.2020]. http://www.globaluniversaldesign.org/goals
  20. 20. Blake, H. M. Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2000, pp. 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/0743461001233127903410.1080/07434610012331279034
  21. 21. Jakaitis, J., Žukas, J. Intuitive spatial interaction in landscape design. Landscape architecture and art, Vol. 15, No. 15, 2020, pp. 22–30. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2019.15.0210.22616/j.landarchart.2019.15.02
  22. 22. Monö, R. G., Knight, M., Monö, R. Design for product understanding: The aesthetics of design from a semiotic approach, Liber, 1997.
  23. 23. Sawtoothsoftware, MaxDiff Technical Paper [online, cited 12.03.2019]. https://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/support/technical-papers/maxdiff-best-worst-scaling/maxdiff-technical-paper-2013
  24. 24. Volvo XC90 owner’s manual [online, cited 08.01.2019] https://volvornt.harte-hanks.com/manuals/2018/17wk46/XC90_OwnersManual_MY18_en-US_TP24829.pdf
  25. 25. Dimensions, Volvo cars [online, cited 10.01.2019] https://www.volvocars.com/intl/cars/new-models/xc90/specifications/dimensions
  26. 26. Handbook of human factors in medical device design [M. B. Weinger, M. E. Wiklund, D. J. Gardner-Bonneau, eds.]. Boca Raton, Florida, U.S.: CRC Press, 2010. 844 p.
  27. 27. Dotson, J. P., Beltramo, M. A., Feit, E. M., Smith, R. C. Modeling the Effect of Images on Product Choices, April 12, 2019. 53 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.228257010.2139/ssrn.2282570
  28. 28. Kang, N., Ren, Y. Feinberg, F.M., Papalambros, P. Form+Function: Optimizing Aesthetic Product Design via Adaptive, Geometrized Preference Elicitation. University of Michigan, 2016.
  29. 29. Kreuzbauer, R., Malter, A. J. Embodied cognition and new product design: Changing product form to influence brand categorization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2005, pp. 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00112.x10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00112.x
  30. 30. Ranscombe, C., Hicks, B., Mullineux, G., Singh, B. Visually decomposing vehicle images: Exploring the influence of different aesthetic features on consumer perception of brand. Design Studies, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2012, pp. 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.00610.1016/j.destud.2011.06.006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8764 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4333
Language: English
Page range: 72 - 77
Published on: Mar 1, 2021
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Jonas Žukas, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.