Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Aesthetics of Sustainability and Architecture: An Overview Cover

Aesthetics of Sustainability and Architecture: An Overview

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. 1. Throsby, D. Economic and culture, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Press, 2001, 228 p.
  2. 2. Hillegas, J.V. Defining sustainability. 2010 [online]. Sustainability History Project [cited 02.07.2020]. https://sustainabilityhistory.org/defining-sustainability/
  3. 3. Brown, M., Haselsteiner, E., Apró, D., Kopeva, D., Luca, E., Pulkkinen, K., Vula Rizvanolli, B. Sustainability, restorative to regenerative. COST Action CA16114 RESTORE, Working Group One Report: Restorative Sustainability, 2018 [online, cited 03.03.2020]. https://www.eurestore.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Sustainability-Restorative-to-Regenerative.pdf
  4. 4. Istiadji, A.D., Hardiman, G., Satwiko, P. What is the sustainable method enough for our built environment? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 213, 2018, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/213/1/01201610.1088/1755-1315/213/1/012016
  5. 5. Guy, S., Farmer, G. Reinterpreting sustainable architecture: the place of technology. Journal of Architectural Education, Vol. 54, Issue 3, 2001, pp. 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1162/1046488015263245110.1162/10464880152632451
  6. 6. Berardi, U. Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 8, 2013, pp. 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.00810.1016/j.scs.2013.01.008
  7. 7. Cole, R. J. Regenerative design and development: Current theory and practice. Building Research & Information, Vol. 40, Issue 1, 2012, pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.61751610.1080/09613218.2012.617516
  8. 8. Wilkinson, S., Hajibandeh, M., Remoy, H. Sustainable development. In: Noguchi M. (ed.) ZEMCH: Toward the Delivery of Zero Energy Mass Custom Homes. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering, Springer, 2016, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31967-4_110.1007/978-3-319-31967-4_1
  9. 9. Chen, C. CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 57, Issue 3, 2006, pp. 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.2031710.1002/asi.20317
  10. 10. Donovan, E. An evolution of sustainable aesthetics. Design to Thrive: PLEA 2017 Proceedings, 2017, pp. 208–215.
  11. 11. Finocchiaro, L., Wago, I. S. Architectural design and aesthetics of Zero Emission Buildings: an analysis of perceived architectural qualities in the ZEB Living LAB in Trondheim. Design to Thrive: PLEA 2017 Proceedings, 2017, pp. 216–223.
  12. 12. Čeněk, M. Architecture: concept, form and aesthetics from the perspective of sustainability. CESB 2013 PRAGUE - Central Europe Towards Sustainable Building 2013: Sustainable Building and Refurbishment for Next Generations, 2013, pp. 523–526.
  13. 13. Gan, S., Zhang, H. The discussion of the concept of sustainable development of ecological architectural aesthetics. Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 598, 2012, pp. 8–11. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.598.810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.598.8
  14. 14. Dekay, M. Five levels of sustainable design aesthetics. Perceiving and appreciating developmental complexity. 28th International PLEA Conference on Sustainable Architecture + Urban Design: Opportunities, Limits and Needs - Towards an Environmentally Responsible Architecture proceeding, 2012, pp. 7–12.
  15. 15. Bothwell, K. The architecture of the passively tempered environment. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 66–78.
  16. 16. Finocchicaro, L., Hestnes, A. G. Symbiosis and Mimesis in the Built Environment. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of Sustainable Architecture. 010 Publishers, Rotterdam, 2011, pp. 259 –271.
  17. 17. Hill, G. The aesthetics of architectural consumption. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 26 –40.
  18. 18. Jauslin, D. Landscape aesthetics for sustainable architecture. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 109–119.
  19. 19. Knowles, R. L. Solar aesthetic. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 50–65.
  20. 20. Sauerbruch, M., Hutton, L. What does sustainability look like? In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 41–49.
  21. 21. Levit, R. Design’s new catechism. In: Preston, S. C., Naginski E. (eds.) The return to nature. Sustaining architecture in the face of sustainability. Routledge, 2014, pp. 9–19.
  22. 22. Sunikka-Blank, M. The concept and aesthetics of sustainable building in Japan. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of sustainable architecture. 010 Publishers, Rotterdam, 2011, pp. 186–197.
  23. 23. Spirn, A. The poetics of city and nature: towards a new aesthetic for urban design. Landscape Journal, Vol. 7, Issue 2, 1988, pp. 108–126. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.7.2.10810.3368/lj.7.2.108
  24. 24. Sheppard, S. R. J. Beyond visual resource management: emerging theories of an ecological aesthetic and visible stewardship. In: Sheppard, S.R.J., Harshaw, H. W. (eds.) Forests and landscapes– linking ecology, sustainablility, and aesthetics. New York, NY, CABI Publishing, 2001, pp. 149–172.
  25. 25. Hemmati, M. Aesthetics of sustainability. The relation of aesthetics and environmental sustainability. MFNZFR, Vol. 35, Special Issue: Art, Nature, City, 2016, pp. 82–89.
  26. 26. Di Carlo, I. The Aesthetics of Sustainability. Systemic thinking and self-organization in the evolution of cities. PhD thesis, University of Trento, IAAC, institute fro Advanced Architecture of Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, The Bartlett, UCL, London, Uk, University of Innsbruck, Austria, 2016.
  27. 28. Di Carlo, I. Aesthetics as an adaptive system. An evolutionary approach on aesthetics and sustainable city design. In: I. Di Carlo (ed.), The Aesthetic of Sustainability, Monograph.it, 2013, pp. 376–377.
  28. 29. Marchand, A., Walker, S., De Coninck, P. The role of beauty for sustainability: a discussion on responsible consumption, aesthetics attitudes and product design. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 99, 2006, pp. 371–380. https://doi.org/10.2495/RAV06037110.2495/RAV060371
  29. 30. Kagan, S. Aesthetics of sustainability: a transdisciplinary sensibility for transformative practices. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, Vol. 2, 2011, pp. 65–73. https://doi.org/10.22545/2011/0001410.22545/2011/00014
  30. 31. Wines, J. Green Architecture. Koln: Taschen, 2000, 240 p.
  31. 32. Liu, Ch. Green architecture. Liaoning Science & Technology Pub., 2011, 272 p.
  32. 33. Jodidio, P. 100 contemporary green buildings. Vol. 1–2, Koln: Taschen, 2013, 696 p.
  33. 34. Helmke, J. Eco-visualization: aesthetics for sustainability. Urban Omnibus, 2013 [online, cited 02.07.2020]. https://urbanomnibus.net/2013/04/eco-visualization-aesthetics-for-sustainability/
  34. 35. Goodbun, J. Gregory Bateson’s critical cybernetics and ecological aesthetics of dwelling. Field, Vol. 4, Issue 1, 2010, pp. 35–46.
  35. 36. Štelbienė, A. Architektūros kokybė. Etika, estetika ir tapatybė. Architektūros kokybės kriterijai. Mokslo straipsniū rinkinys, 2015, pp. 28–39.
  36. 37. Kamicaityte-Virbasiene, J., Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I. Premises for development of sustainable architecture in urban environment. Town Planning and Architecture, Vol. 33, Issue 4, 2009, pp. 363–363.
  37. 38. CIB, Conseil International du Bâtiment. Towards sustainable and smart-eco buildings. Summary report on the EU-funded project smart-ECO buildings in the EU, Rotterdam, 2010 [online, cited 03.03.2020]. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB18098.pdf
  38. 39. Mačiulis, A. Šiuolaikinės Lietuvos architektūros meninės raiškos tendencijos. Vilnius: Technika. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Doctoral Thesis, 2013, 197 p.10.20334/2181-M
  39. 40. Puglisi, L. P. New directions in contemporary architecture: evolutions and revolutions in building design since 1988. New Jersey, U.S.: Willey, 2008. 240 p.
  40. 41. Adrijauskas, A. Klasikinės Vakarū metafizinės estetikos ir meno filosofijos transformacijos: neklasikiniū principū sklaida. Estetikos ir meno filosofijos transformacijos / sudarytojas Antanas Andrijauskas, Vilnius: Kultūros, filosofijos ir meno institutas, 2005, pp. 12–71.
  41. 42. Heymann, D. An un-flushable urinal. Places Journal, June 2012. https://doi.org/10.22269/12060710.22269/120607
  42. 43. Briggs, D. Aesthetic potentials in an open network inventory system. In: Lee S. (ed.) Aesthetics of Sustainable Architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2011, pp. 272–283.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8764 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4333
Language: English
Page range: 48 - 55
Published on: Dec 31, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Aurelija Daugelaite, Indre Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.