Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Office-Nature Integration Trends and Forest-Office Concept FO-AM Cover

References

  1. 1. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division, UN Proceedings, New York, 2019 [online, cited 05.05.2020]. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf
  2. 2. Mangone, G., Capaldi, C.A., van Allen, Z. M., Luscuere, P. G. Bringing nature to work: Preferences and perceptions of constructed indoor and natural outdoor workspaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 23, 2017, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.00910.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.009
  3. 3. Gjerland, A., Søiland, E., Thuen, F. Office concepts: A scoping review. Building and Environment, Vol. 163, 2019, 106294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.10629410.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106294
  4. 4. van der Ploeg, H. P, Chey, T., Korda, R.J., Banks, E., Bauman, A. Sitting time and all-cause mortality risk in 222497 Australian adults. Arch Intern Med, Vol. 172, 2012, pp. 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.217410.1001/archinternmed.2011.2174
  5. 5. Säynäjoki, E., Heinonen, J., Junnila, S. Role of urban planning in encouraging more sustainable lifestyles. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 141, Issue 1, 2015, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.000019610.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000196
  6. 6. Alexander, Ch. Silverstein, M., Ishikawa, S. The pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977, 1171 p.
  7. 7. Rudokas, K. and Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I. Total heritage: future Eopolis for cultural urban singularity. Foresight, 2020, Vol. ahead-of-print, Issue ahead-of print doi.org/10.1108/FS-03-2020-003110.1108/FS-03-2020-0031
  8. 8. Wright, F. L. The disappearing city. New York: W. F. Payson, 1932. 90 p.
  9. 9. Rudokas, K. Urbanistikos ir architektūros paveldo holistinis suvokimas: eschatologinė prieiga [Holistic perception of urban and architectural heritage: eschatological approach]. Logos, Vol. 101, 2019, pp. 147–158. https://doi.org/10.24101/logos.2019.82.10.24101/logos.2019.82
  10. 10. Stewart, J. E. Evolutionary possibilities: can a society be constrained so that ‘the good’ selforganizes? World Futures, Vol. 74, Issue 1, 2018, pp. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2017.1357985.10.1080/02604027.2017.1357985
  11. 11. Benke K., Tomkins B. Future food-production systems: vertical farming and controlled-environment agriculture. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, Vol. 13, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2017.139405410.1080/15487733.2017.1394054
  12. 12. Beacham A. M., Vickers L. H., Monaghan, J. M. Vertical farming: a summary of approaches to growing skywards. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, Vol. 94, Issue 3, 2019, pp. 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2019.157421410.1080/14620316.2019.1574214
  13. 13. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Database on Arable Land [online, cited 26.11.2020]. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.ARBL.HA.PC?end¼2013&start¼1961&view¼chart
  14. 14. Ulrich, R. S. Natural vs. urban scenes: some psychophysiological effects. Environ. Behav., Vol. 13, 1981, pp. 523–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391658113500110.1177/0013916581135001
  15. 15. Ulrich, R. S. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, Vol. 224, 1984, pp. 420–421. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.614340210.1126/science.6143402
  16. 16. McEwan, K., Ferguson, F. J., Richardson, M., Cameron, R. The good things in urban nature: A thematic framework for optimising urban planning for nature connectedness. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 194, 2020, 103687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.10368710.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103687
  17. 17. Heerwagen, J. Biophilia, health, and well-being. In: Campbell, L., Wiesen, A., (eds.) Restorative commons: creating health and well-being through urban landscapes. Gen. Tech Rep. NRS-P-39, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 2009, pp. 38–57.
  18. 18. Gillis, K., Gatersleben, B. A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings, Vol. 5, 2015, pp. 948–963. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings503094810.3390/buildings5030948
  19. 19. Abdelaal, M.S. Biophilic campus: an emerging planning approach for a sustainable innovation-conducive university. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 215, 2019, pp. 1445–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.18510.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.185
  20. 20. Colley, K., Craig, T. Natural places: perceptions of wildness and attachment to local greenspace. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 61, 2019, pp. 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.12.00710.1016/j.jenvp.2018.12.007
  21. 21. Martin, L., White, M. P., Hunt, A., Richardson, M., Pahl, S., Burt, J. Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 68, 2020, 101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.10138910.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389
  22. 22. Wilson E. O. Biophilia, the human bond with other species. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984. 157 p.
  23. 23. Kellert, S., Calabrese, E. The practice of biophilic design, 2015 [online, cited 02.01.2020]. www.biophilic-design.com
  24. 24. Sterkenberg, Z. Office futures: the office design trends of 2020, 2019 [online]. Ambius [cited 05.05.2020] https://www.ambius.com/blog/2020-office-design-trends/
  25. 25. Office in a Forest: Is this the Workplace of the Future? [online]. Temasek [cited 05.05.2020]. https://www.temasek.com.sg/en/news-and-views/stories/sustainability/generational-investing/office-in-a-forest-future-work-place
  26. 26. Greenfield, R. Why your office is beginning to look like a forest, 2018 [online, cited 05.05.2020] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-02-05/why-your-office-is-beginning-to-look-like-a-forest
  27. 27. Biswas, A., Paul, I. Faulkner, G. E., Bajaj, R. R., Silver, M. A., Mitchell, M. S., Alter, D. A. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 162, 2015, pp. 123–132. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-165110.7326/M14-1651
  28. 28. Withagen, R., Caljouw, R. S. ‘The End of Sitting’: An Empirical Study on Working in an Office of the Future. Sports Med, Vol. 46, 2016, pp. 1019–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0448-y10.1007/s40279-015-0448-y
  29. 29. Renaud, L. R., Huysmans, M. A., Speklé, E. M., van der Beek, A. J., van der Ploeg, H. P. ‘The End of Sitting’ in a public space: observations of spontaneous visitors. BMC Public Health, Vol. 17, 2017, 937. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4971-710.1186/s12889-017-4971-7
  30. 30. Perino, A., Pereira, H. M., Navarro, L. M., Fernández, N., Bullock, J. M., Ceausu, S., Cortes-Avizanda, A., van Klink, R., Kuemmerle, T., Lomba, A., Pe’er, G., Plienger, T., Rey Benayas, J.M., Sandom, C.J., Svenning, J.-C., Wheeler, H.C. Rewilding complex ecosystems. Science, Vol. 364, 2019, 5570. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav557010.1126/science.aav5570
  31. 31. Balevičiūtė, A., Veteikis, D. Renatūralizacijos pokyčiai Lietuvos kraštovaizdyje 1995–2010 metais. Geografija, Vol. 48, Issue 2, 2012, pp. 132–144. https://doi.org/10.6001/geografija.v48i2.254310.6001/geografija.v48i2.2543
  32. 32. Solé, R. V., Montañez, R., Duran-Nebreda, S. Synthetic circuit designs for earth terraformation. Biology Direct, Vol. 10, Issue 1, 2015, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-015-0064-710.1186/s13062-015-0064-7
  33. 33. Solé, R. V., Montañez, R., Duran-Nebreda, S., Rodriguez-Amor, D., Vidiella, B., Sardanyés, J. Population dynamics of synthetic terraformation motifs. Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 5, Issue 7, 2018, 180121. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.18012110.1098/rsos.180121
  34. 34. Interfacing with the brain, 2020 [online]. Neuralink [cited 26.11.2020] https://neuralink.com/approach/
  35. 35. Growing up: skyscraper farms seen as a way to produce food locally and cut greenhouse emissions, 2019 [online]. Scientific American [cited 04.11.2019] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/earth-talks-skyscraper-farms/
  36. 36. Despommier, D. The vertical farm: feeding the world in the 21st century. New York: Picador, 2010, 336 p.
  37. 37. Dudley, N. Authenticity as a Means of Measuring Forest Quality. Biodiversity Letters Vol. 3, Issue 1, 1996, pp. 6–9. https://doi.org/10.2307/299970310.2307/2999703
  38. 38. Kurashov, V. I. Ecology and eschatology. Russian Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 37, Issue 3, 1998, pp. 8–18. https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-19673703810.2753/RSP1061-196737038
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8764 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4333
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 47
Published on: Dec 31, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Kastytis Rudokas, Huriye Armagan Dogan, Odeta Viliūnienė, Jurga Vitkuvienė, Indrė Gražulevičiūtė-Vileniškė, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.