References
- 1. Huxley, M. Historicizing Planning, Problematizing Participation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 37, Issue 5, 2013, pp. 1527–1541. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.1204510.1111/1468-2427.12045
- 2. McTague, C., Jakubowski, S. Marching to the beat of a silent drum: Wasted consensus-building and failed neighborhood participatory planning. Applied Geography, Vol. 44, 2013, pp. 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.01910.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.019
- 3. Brannan, T., John, P., Stoker, G. Active Citizenship and Effective Public Services and Programmes: How Can We Know What Really Works? Urban Studies, Vol. 43, Issue 5–6, 2006, pp. 993–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098060067662610.1080/00420980600676626
- 4. Aitken, M., Haggett, C., Rudolph, D. Practices and rationales of community engagement with wind farms: awareness raising, consultation, empowerment. Planning Theory & Practice, Vol. 17, Issue 4, 2016, pp. 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.121891910.1080/14649357.2016.1218919
- 5. Anggraeni, M., Gupta, J., Verrest, H. J. L. M. Cost and value of stake-holders participation: A systematic literature review. Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 101, 2019, pp. 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.01210.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.012
- 6. Karrasch, L., Klenke, T., Woltjer, J. Linking the ecosystem services approach to social preferences and needs in integrated coastal land use management – A planning approach. Land Use Policy, Vol. 38, 2014, pp. 522–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.01010.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.010
- 7. Conroy, M. M., Jun, H.-J. Planning process influences on sustainability in Ohio township plans. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 59, Issue 11, 2016, pp. 2007–2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.110370910.1080/09640568.2015.1103709
- 8. Geissel, B. Participatory Governance: Hope or Danger for Democracy? A Case Study of Local Agenda 21. Local Government Studies, Vol. 35, Issue 4, 2009, pp. 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/0300393090299952210.1080/03003930902999522
- 9. Legacy, C. Is there a crisis of participatory planning? Planning Theory, Vol. 16, Issue 4, 2017, pp. 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309521666743310.1177/1473095216667433
- 10. Arnstein, S. R. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 35, Issue 4, 1969, pp. 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194436690897722510.1080/01944366908977225
- 11. IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation, 2018 [online]. IAP2 International Federation [cited 20.08.2020]. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/Spectrum_8.5x11_Print.pdf
- 12. Tsenkova, S. Planning trajectories in post-socialist cities: patterns of divergence and change. Urban Research & Practice, Vol. 7, Issue 3, 2014, pp. 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2014.96651310.1080/17535069.2014.966513
- 13. Auziņš, A. Key trends and aspects influencing changes into spatial planning systems and practices in Europe. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference “ECONOMIC SCIENCE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT”, 2018, pp. 26–35. http://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2018.06510.22616/ESRD.2018.065
- 14. Nedović-Budić, Z. Adjustment of Planning Practice to the New Eastern and Central European Context. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 67, Issue 1, 2001, pp. 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194436010897635410.1080/01944360108976354
- 15. Tsenkova, S. Reinventing Strategic Planning in Post-socialist Cities: Experiences from Sofia. European Planning Studies, Vol. 15, Issue 3, 2007, pp. 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431060101713310.1080/09654310601017133
- 16. Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I., Urbonas, V. Urban regeneration in the context of post-Soviet transformation: Lithuanian experience. Journal of Cultural Heritage, Vol. 15, Issue 6, 2014, pp. 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2014.01.00210.1016/j.culher.2014.01.002
- 17. Kotus, J. Position of the Polish city on the ladder of public participation: Are we going the right way? The case of Poznań. Cities, Vol. 35, 2013, pp. 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.08.00110.1016/j.cities.2013.08.001
- 18. Poljak Istenič, S., Kozina, J. Participatory Planning in a Post-socialist Urban Context: Experience from Five Cities in Central and Eastern Europe. In: Nared, J., Bole, D. (eds.) Participatory Research and Planning in Practice. The Urban book series. Springer, Cham. 2020, pp. 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28014-7_310.1007/978-3-030-28014-7_3
- 19. Lorens, P., Kamrowska-Zaluska, D. Spurring the community involvement in planning - lessons from post-socialist cities. 49th ISOCARP Congress : Frontier of planning – evolving and declining models of city planning practice, 2013, pp. 1–6.
- 20. Guasti, P. Development of citizen participation in Central and Eastern Europe after the EU enlargement and economic crises. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 49, Issue 3, 2016, pp. 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.06.00610.1016/j.postcomstud.2016.06.006
- 21. Kotus, J., Sowada, T., Rzeszewski, M., Mańkowska, P. Anatomy of Place-Making in the Context of the Communication Processes: A Story of one Community and one Square in a Post-Socialist City. Quaestiones Geographicae, Vol. 38, Issue 2, 2019, pp. 51–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-001510.2478/quageo-2019-0015
- 22. Prilenska, V., Liias, R. Challenges of Recent Participatory Urban Design Practices in Riga. Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 21, 2015, pp. 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00154-910.1016/S2212-5671(15)00154-9
- 23. Holvandus, J., Leetmaa, K. The Views of Neighbourhood Associations on Collaborative Urban Governance in Tallinn, Estonia. plaNext - Next Generation Planning, Vol. 3, 2016, pp. 49–66. https://doi.org/10.24306/plnxt.2016.03.00410.24306/plnxt.2016.03.004
- 24. Koroļova, A., Treija, S. Participatory Budgeting in Urban Regeneration: Defining the Gap Between Formal and Informal Citizen Activism. Architecture and Urban Planning, Vol. 15, Issue 1, 2019, pp. 131–137. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2019-001810.2478/aup-2019-0018
- 25. Treija, S., Bratuškins, U. Participatory Planning: The Role of NGOs in Neighbourhood Regeneration in Riga. Spaces of Dialog for Places of Dignity: Fostering the European Dimension of Planning: Lisbon AESOP Annual Congress 2017: Book of Proceedings, 2017, pp. 609–616.
- 26. Miķelsone, I. The Role of Social Engagement in the Development of Significant Architectural Objects. Architecture and Urban Planning, Vol. 13, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/aup-2017-000110.1515/aup-2017-0001
- 27. Gaber, J. Qualitative Analysis for Planning & Policy : Beyond the Numbers. Oxon: Routledge, 2020. 212 p.10.4324/9780429290190
- 28. Rīgas attīstības plāns 1995.–2005. gadam. I sējums. Riga: Apgāds Jāņa sēta, 1995.
- 29. Liepa-Zemeša, M. Jaunā Rīgas teritorijas plānojuma izstrādes metodika. Latvijas architektūra, Vol. 108, 2013, pp. 78–80.
- 30. Liepa-Zemeša, M. Pilsēttelpas attīstība Rīgā. Riga: Riga Technical University, 2011. 204 p.
- 31. Dripe, J. Rīgas attīstības plāns – iespējas, problēmas un risinājumi, 2011 [online]. Goethe-Institut Riga [cited 19.09.2019]. https://www.goethe.de/ins/lv/lv/kul/mag/20490788.html
- 32. Sabiedrības aktivitāte Teritorijas plānojuma izstrādē, 2005. Riga City Council, City Development Department.
- 33. Pilnveidotās redakcijas publiskās apspriešanas laikā (no 13.03.2019. līdz 10.04.2019.) saņemto priekšlikumu izvērtējums, 2019 [online]. Riga City Council, City Development Department [cited 09.09.2020]. https://www.rdpad.lv/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/4_Zinojuma_pielikums_nr2_RTP2030_Publiskas_apspriesanas_priekslikumi_2019.xlsx
- 34. Ziņojums par Rīgas teritorijas plānojuma līdz 2030. gadam publiskās apspriešanas norisi, saņemtajiem priekšlikumiem un institūciju atzinumiem, 2018. Riga City Council, City Development Department.
- 35. Ziņojums par Rīgas teritorijas plānojuma līdz 2030. gadam pilnveidotās redakcijas publisko apspriešanu, 2019 [online]. Riga City Council, City Development Department [cited 09.09.2020]. https://www.rdpad.lv/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Zinojums11022020.pdf
- 36. Gaugere, K. Pārskats par nevalstisko organizāciju sektoru Latvijā: 2004. gads, 2005 [online, cited 4.09.2020]. http://providus.lv/article_files/1469/original/parskatsNVO2004.pdf?1331652402
- 37. Indriksone, A. Nevalstiskās organizācijas - pašvaldību partneri attīstības plānošanā, 2003 [online, cited 4.09.2020]. http://providus.lv/article_files/1446/original/nvopasvpartn_LV.pdf?1331625050
- 38. Rīgas iedzīvotāju aptaujas par dažādiem Rīgas domi interesējošiem jautājumiem rezultāti, 2007 [online]. Tirgus un sabiedriskās domas pētījumu centrs SKDS [cited 4.09.2020]. http://www.sus.lv/sites/default/files/media/faili/isaa_atskaite_rd_082007_0.pdf
- 39. Rīgas iedzīvotāju apmierinātība ar pašvaldības darbību un pilsētā notiekošajiem procesiem, 2019. [online]. Tirgus un sabiedriskās domas pētījumu centrs SKDS [cited 4.09.2020]. http://www.sus.lv/sites/default/files/media/faili/rd_pad_atskaite_2019.pdf
- 40. Rīgas iedzīvotāju apmierinātība ar pašvaldības darbību un pilsētā notiekošajiem procesiem, 2018. [online]. Tirgus un sabiedriskās domas pētījumu centrs SKDS [cited 4.09.2020]. http://www.sus.lv/sites/default/files/rd_pad_skds_aptaujas_atskaite_2018.pdf