Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Identifying Key Criteria for Quality Assessment of Landscape Architecture Projects Cover

Identifying Key Criteria for Quality Assessment of Landscape Architecture Projects

Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. 1. Dale, V. H., Kline, K. L., Parish, E. S., Eichler, S. E. Engaging stake-holders to assess landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 34, 2019, pp. 1199–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00848-110.1007/s10980-019-00848-1
  2. 2. Rasmussen, L. V., Bierbaum, R., Oldekop, J. A., Agrawal, A. Bridging the Practitioner–Researcher Divide: Indicators to Track Environmental, Economic, and Sociocultural Sustainability of Agricultural Commodity Production. Glob Environ Chang., Vol. 42, 2017, pp. 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.00110.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.001
  3. 3. Musacchio L. R. Key concepts and research priorities for landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 28, 2013, pp. 995–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9909-610.1007/s10980-013-9909-6
  4. 4. Wu, J. Landscape Sustainability Science: Ecosystem Services and Human Well-being in Changing Landscapes. Landscape Ecology, Vol. 28, 2013, pp. 999–1023.10.1007/s10980-013-9894-9
  5. 5. Gardner, L., Rogers, S., Sipes, J. L. Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Sustainable Landscapes Initiative 2020. U.S. Department of Energy: Office of Scientific and Technical Information, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2172/112895410.2172/1128954
  6. 6. Thome, A. M. T., Ceryno, P. S., Scavarda, A., Remmen, A. Sustainable infrastructure: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 184, 2016, pp. 143–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.08010.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.080
  7. 7. Wang, B., Liu, Zh., Mei, Yu., Li, W. Assessment of Ecosystem Service Quality and Its Correlation with Landscape Patterns in Haidian District, Beijing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 16, 2019, p. 1248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1607124810.3390/ijerph16071248
  8. 8. Moldan, B., Janouškova, S., Hak, T. How to Understand and Measure Environmental Sustainability: Indicators and Targets. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 17, 2012, pp. 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.03310.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033
  9. 9. Wang, Zh., Yang, B. Li, Sh., Binder, Ch. Economic Benefits: Metrics and Methods for Landscape Performance Assessment. Sustainability, Vol. 8, No. 424, 2016, pp. 1‒12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050424.10.3390/su8050424
  10. 10. Wen, B., Burley, J. B. Expert Opinion Dimensions of Rural Landscape Quality in Xiangxi, Hunan, China: Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis. Sustainability, Vol. 12, 2020, p. 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1204131610.3390/su12041316
  11. 11. Mahdiraji, H. A., Arzaghi, S., Stauskis, G., Zavadskas, E. K. A hybrid fuzzy BWM-COPRAS method for analyzing key factors of sustainable architecture // Sustainability. Basel: MDPI AG. eISSN 2071-1050. Vol. 10, Issue 5, art. No. 1626, 2018. pp. 1‒26. (Special Issue: Sustainability in Construction Engineering). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051626.10.3390/su10051626
  12. 12. Yang, B., Li, Sh., Binder, Ch. 2016. A Research Frontier in Landscape Architecture: Landscape Performance and Assessment of Social Benefits. Landscape Research, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2015. pp. 314‒329. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2015.107794410.1080/01426397.2015.1077944
  13. 13. Deveikienė, V. Methodological guidelines for optimizing the interaction between landscape architecture and urban planning. Landscape Architecture and Art, Vol. 12, No. 12, 2018, pp. 7‒21. https://doi.org/10.22616/j.landarchart.2018.12.01.10.22616/j.landarchart.2018.12.01
  14. 14. Kuiper, J. A Checklist Approach to Evaluate the Contribution of Organic Farms to Landscape Quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, No. 77. 2000. pp. 143–156. PII: S0167-8809(99)00099-7.
  15. 15. Bengtsson, A., Hägerhäll, C., Englund, J.-E., Grahn, P. Outdoor Environments at Three Nursing Homes: Semantic Environmental Descriptions. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, Vol. 29, No. 1‒2, 2015, pp. 53‒76. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2014.98786310.1080/02763893.2014.987863
  16. 16. Yu, S., Yu, B., Song, W., Wu, B., Zhou, J., Huang, Y., Wu, J., Zhao, F., Mao, W. View-based Greenery: A Three-dimensional Assessment of City Buildings’ Green Visibility Using Floor Green View Index. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 152, 2016. pp. 13–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.00410.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.004
  17. 17. Karaşah, B. A Visual Landscape Assessment of Forest Roads: Case of Kafkasör-Mersivan Route, Artvin. Kastamonu University. Journal of Forestry Faculty, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2017, pp. 404‒413. IFS 2016, Special Issue. https://doi.org/10.17475/kastorman.285686.10.17475/kastorman.285686
  18. 18. Montero-Parejo, M. J., Garcia-Moruno, L., Reyes-Rodriguez, A. M., Hernandez-Blanco, J., Garrido-Velarde, J. Analysis of Façade Color and Cost to Improve Visual Integration of Buildings in the Rural Environment. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 3840, 2020, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093840.10.3390/su12093840
  19. 19. Kavaliauskas, P. Kraštovaizdžio samprata ir planavimas. Mokomoji knyga. Vilniaus universitetas. 2011, pp. 72‒73, 129‒130. ISBN 978-609-459-004-7.
  20. 20. Solehin Fitry Rosley, M., Lamit, H., Rahman, S.R.A. Perceiving the Aesthetic Value of the Rural Landscape through Valid Indicators. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 85, 2013, pp. 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.36210.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.362
  21. 21. Kuster, C., Hippolyte, J.-L., Rezgui, Y. The UDSA ontology: An Ontology to Support Real Time Urban Sustainability Assessment. Advances in Engineering Software. Vol. 140, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.10273110.1016/j.advengsoft.2019.102731
  22. 22. Bassuk, N., Trowbridge, P. Creating the Urban Eden: Sustainable Landscape Establishment in Theory and Practice. Sustainability and Horticultural Education. Vol. 20 No. 3. 2010. pp. 485‒486. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.20.3.48510.21273/HORTTECH.20.3.485
  23. 23. American Society of Landscape Architects ASLA. Sustainable Sites Initiative. The Case for Sustainable Landscapes. 2009. 54 p. [online]. Sustainable Sites [cited 27.07.2020]. www.sustainablesites.org
  24. 24. Noralizawati, M., Noriah, O., Mohd, H. A. Value of Nature in Life: Landscape Visual Quality Assessment at Rainforest Trail, Penang. Procedia ‒ Social and Behavioral Sciences, No. 50, 2012, pp. 667–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.06910.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.069
  25. 25. Reformatų skveras, 2019 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. http://reformatuskveras.lt/
  26. 26. Lukiškių aikštė. Gedimino pr. Naujamiestis, Vilnius, 2020 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://citify.eu/lukiskiu-aikste/
  27. 27. E. Balsio skvero rekonstrukcijos projektas: su vardiniais suoliukais ir scena kultūros renginiams, 2020 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://vilnius.lt/lt/2020/02/13/e-balsio-skvero-rekonstrukcijos-projektas-su-vardiniais-suoliukais-ir-scena-kulturos-renginiams/
  28. 28. Vilniaus Šiaurinės gatvės projektą žada pagaliau išjudinti: statybos – galbūt dar šiemet. 2020 [online, cited 31.07.2020]. https://www.15min.lt/gazas/naujiena/gatve/vilniaus-siaurines-gatves-projekta-zada-pagaliau-isjudinti-statybas-jau-vasara-221-1264078#_
  29. 29. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., Brown, T. Environmental Preference. A Comparison of Four Domains of Predictors. Environment and Behaviour. Vol. 21, No. 5, 1989, pp. 509‒530. SAGE Social Science Collections. SAGE Publications Inc.10.1177/0013916589215001
  30. 30. Maslow, A. H. A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review. Vol. 50, 1943, pp. 370‒396.10.1037/h0054346
  31. 31. The Reformation Garden conservation project. 2020 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://s1.15min.lt/images/photos/2018/08/09/original/vilniaus-savivaldybes-parengto-reformatu-skvero-plano-aptarimas-su-jo-kurejais-5b6c65f034d08.jpg
  32. 32. Lukiškių plaza project in Vilnius City. 2018 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://www.lrt.lt/img/2016/05/12/125399-306040-756x425.jpg
  33. 33. Eduardo Balsio square project in Vilnius City. 2020 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://vilnius.lt/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Eduard_Balsio_skver2.jpg
  34. 34. The Northern Street project in Vilnius City. 2018 [online, cited 30.07.2020]. https://s2.15min.lt/static/cache/OTI1eDYxMCw0Nz-V4NDEyLDYxNjMwNCxvcmlnaW5hbCwsaWQ9Mzc2NDM-4NiZkYXRlPTIwMTglMkYwMyUyRjE5LDMyMzY5MDk-0MzY=/29343227_1220876294715369_7949022276257579008_n-5aafab1ee0297.jpg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2020-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8764 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4333
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 11
Published on: Sep 3, 2020
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Gintaras Stauskis, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.