Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of Commuter Satisfaction in the Usage of Bus-Shelters: the Ataköy Zone 5 and Beşyol Metrobus Stops, Istanbul Cover

Assessment of Commuter Satisfaction in the Usage of Bus-Shelters: the Ataköy Zone 5 and Beşyol Metrobus Stops, Istanbul

Architecture and Urban Planning
Volume 14 (2018): Issue 1 (December 2018)
By: Gökçen Firdevs Yücel Caymaz  
Open Access
|Sep 2018

References

  1. 1. King, R.D.Bus occupant safety. Transportation Research Board, 1996. 56 p.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. Road Service and Translink. Bus Stop Design Guide, Investor in People, 2005 [online, cited 22.05.2018]. http://www.planningni.gov.uk/downloads/busstop-designguide.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. Johnson, V.D., Ponnuswamy, S.Urban transportation: planning, operation and management. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2012. 272 p.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. Zeeger, Ch.V. Pedestrian facilities users guide: Providing safety and mobility. diane publishing, 2002. 162 p.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. Imperial County Transportation Commission [online]. Bus Stop Design and Safety Guideline Handbook [cited 22.05.2018]. http://www.imperialctc.org/media/managed/news/Final-2014-ICTC-Bus-Stop-Design-and-Safety-Guideline-Handbook.pdf, 2017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. Voigt, N. R. Transportation Depth Reference Manual for the Civil PE Exam, Professional Publications Inc; 2nd Second Edition, 2016, 350 p.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. Transfort [online]. Bus Stop Design Standards & Guidelines [cited 22.05.2018]. http://www.ridetransfort.com/img/site_specific/uploads/Final_Design_Standards.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. Gattis, J. L.Guide for the geometric design of driveways. Transportation Research Board, 2010, 32 p.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. Grava, S.Urban transportation systems. Choices for communities. 2003 [online, cited 22.05.2018]. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/businessandpartners/accessibile_bus_stop_design_guidance.pdf, 2004.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. Pecheux, K. K. Guidebook for mitigating fixed-route bus-and-pedestrian collisions. Transportation Research Board, 2008. 65 p.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. Zhang, K. J. Bus Stop Urban Design: Nine Techniques for Enhancing Bus Stops and Neighbourhoods and their Application in Metro Vancouver, B. Environment Design, Master Thesis, The University of British Columbia. 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. Foothill Goldline [online]. Bus Stop Location and Design Criteria,Chapter 3 | Proposed Bus/RAIL INTERFACE FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS, Foothill Extension Bus Interface Plan [cited 22.05.2018]. http://foothill-goldline.org/images/uploads/Chapter%203_DRAFT.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. GMPTE. Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive, Design Guidelines for Bus Stops in Greater Manchester, Manchester, 2007 [online, cited 22.05.2018]. http://chennaicityconnect.com/knowledgebase/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/manchester-bus-design-guideline.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. Septa Bus Stop Design Guidelines. City of Philadelphia, Bucks County, Chester County, Delaware County, Montgomery County, 2012 [online, cited 22.05.2018]. https://septa.org/strategic-plan/reports/SEPTA-Bus-Stop-Design-Guidelines-2012.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. Bus Stop Design & Accessibility Guidelines, 2017. Memphis MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization [online, cited 22.05.2018]. http://memphismpo.org/sites/default/files/public/documents/transit-plans/bus-stop-design-and-accessbility-guidelines-apr-2017.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. BC Transit Municipal Systems Program, Design Guidelines for Accesible Bus Stops, 2013 [online]. Transit BC [cited 22.05.2018]. http://www.transitbc.com/corporate/resources/pdf/res-urban-21.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. London, Mayor Of. Accessible bus stop design guidance. 2006 [online, cited 22.05.2018]. http://content.tfl.gov.uk/accessibile-bus-stop-design-guidance.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. Tumlin, J.Sustainable transportation planning: Tools for creating vibrant, healthy, and resilient communities. John Wiley & Sons, 2012, 320 p.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. Bus Stop Design Guide [online]. COTA (Central Ohıo Transıt Authorıty) [cited 22.05.2018]. https://www.cota.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Bus-Stop-Design-Standards.pdf, 2014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. Bus Shelter Policy, 2001 [online]. Holroyd City [cited 22.05.2018]. http://www.holroyd.nsw.gov.au/PDFs/Your%20Council/Policies/Roads%20and%20Infrastucture/Bus%20Shelter%20Policy%20.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. Tysons Corner Urban Design Guidelines, A Fairfax County, Virginia, 2012 [online]. Urban Design Guidelines Advisory Group [cited 22.05.2018]. publicationhttp://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/tysons/design/download/tysons_udg.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. Groene bushokjes in Eindhoven, Oprukkend groen verbinden [online, cited 22.05.2018]. http://www.kaw.nl/project/groene-bushokjes-eindhoven/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. Orange in roof and claw (Bus shelter by Peter Eisenman, Aachen, Germany) [online, cited 22.05.2018]. https://thebeautyoftransport.com/2014/04/02/orange-in-roof-and-claw-bus-shelter-by-peter-eisenmanaachen-germany/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. Strategic Planning Services and Infrastructure Management Services. Transport Stops, Shelters and Seating [online]. The City of Newcastle [cited 22.05.2018]. https://www.newcastle.nsw.gov.au/getmedia/a2df7bc4-28a0-41d2-b836-110ad11d63c5/Transport_stops_shelters_seating.aspx
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. 25. Chien, S. I., Qin, Zh. Optimization of bus stop locations for improving transit accessibility. Transportation planning and Technology, 2004, Vol. 27, Issue 3, pp. 211–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/030810604200022689910.1080/0308106042000226899
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. 26. Loukaitou-Sideris, A. Hot spots of bus stop crime: The importance of environmental attributes. Journal of the American Planning association, 1999, Vol. 65, Issue 4, pp. 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194436990897607010.1080/01944369908976070
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. 27. Hart, T. C., Miethe, T. D. Street robbery and public bus stops: a case study of activity nodes and situational risk. Security Journal, 2014, Vol. 27, Issue 2, pp. 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.510.1057/sj.2014.5
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. 28. Ibeas, Á., et al. Optimizing bus stop spacing in urban areas. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 2010, Vol. 46, Issue 3, pp. 446–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1731-0310.3141/1731-03
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. 29. Liggett, R., Loukaitou-Sideris, A., Iseki, H. Bus stop-environment connection: do characteristics of the built environment correlate with bus stop crime? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001, Vol. 1760, pp. 20–27. https://doi.org/10.3141/1760-0310.3141/1760-03
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. 30. Ewing, R. Using a visual preference survey in transit design. Public Works Management & Policy, 2001, Vol. 5, Issue 4, pp. 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X015400210.1177/1087724X0154002
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. 31. Law, Ph., Taylor, B. Shelter from the storm: Optimizing distribution of bus stop shelters in Los Angeles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001, Vol. 1753, pp. 79–85.10.3141/1753-10
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. 32. Fitzpatrick, K., et al.TCRP Report 19: Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 1996. 222 p. ISBN 0-309-06050-8 [online, cited 22.05.2018]. https://nacto.org/docs/usdg/tcrp_report_19.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. 33. Broome, K., et al. Evaluation of flexible route bus transport for older people. Transport Policy, 2012, Vol. 21, pp. 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.02.00510.1016/j.tranpol.2012.02.005
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. 34. Woldeamanuel, M., Somers, A. When the Wait seems Longer: Assessing Quality Attributes of Bus Stops. TRB 95th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers, 2016. 17 p. [online, cited 22.05.2018]. http://docs.trb.org/prp/16-0446.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. 35. Buys, L., Miller, E. Conceptualising convenience: Transportation practices and perceptions of inner-urban high density residents in Brisbane, Australia. Transport Policy, 2011, Vol. 18, Issue 1, pp. 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.01210.1016/j.tranpol.2010.08.012
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. 36. Pizzato, G., Guimarães, L., Caten, C. The perception of pleasantness in a product of collective use : the bus shelter. Work, 2012, Vol. 41.Supplement 1, pp. 282–289 [cited 22.05.2018]. https://content.iospress.com/download/work/wor0170?id=work%2Fwor0170https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0170-28210.3233/WOR-2012-0170-282
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. 37. Ely, V. H. M. B., De Oliveira, J. M., Lodgsdon, L. A bus stop shelter evaluated from the user’s perspective. Work, 2012, Vol. 41.Supplement 1, pp. 1226–1233. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0307-122610.3233/WOR-2012-0307-1226
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. 38. Nabors, D., et al.Pedestrian road safety audit guidelines and prompt lists. Washington, DC, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety, 2007, 128 p.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. 39. Nikolopoulou, M., Kleissl, J., Linden, P.F., Lykoudis, S. Pedestrians’ perception of environmental stimuli through field surveys: Focus on particulate pollution. Science of the total environment, 2011, Vol. 409, Issue 13, pp. 2493–2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.00210.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.002
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. 40. Pereira, D.A.G., Faria, B.M.A., Goncalves, R.A.M., Carvalho, V.B.F., Prata, K.O., Saraiva, P.S., Navarro, T.P., Cunha-Filho, I. Relação entre força muscular e capacidade funcional em pacientes com doença arterial obstrutiva periférica: um estudo piloto. Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, 2011, Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 26–30 [online, cited 22.05.2018]. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/jvb/v10n1/v10n1a05.pdf10.1590/S1677-54492011000100005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. 41. Iseki, H., Ringler A., Taylor B.D., Miller, M. and Smart, M.Evaluating Transit Stops and Stations from the Perspective of Transit Users, 2007 [online, cited 22.05.2018]. https://www.its.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2014/06/Appendix-C.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2018-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2255-8764 | Journal ISSN: 1691-4333
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 13
Published on: Sep 26, 2018
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Bus-shelter,
bus-shelter design,
user satisfaction,
user perception
Related subjects:
Architecture and design,
Architecture,
Urbanism,
Architecture and design, other

© 2018 Gökçen Firdevs Yücel Caymaz, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 14 (2018): Issue 1 (December 2018)Next article