On an improved computational solution for the 3D HCIR PDE in finance

Soleymani, Fazlollah; Akgül, Ali; Akgül, Esra Karatas

doi:10.2478/auom-2019-0042

Abstract

The aim of this work is to tackle the three–dimensional (3D) Heston– Cox–Ingersoll–Ross (HCIR) time–dependent partial differential equation (PDE) computationally by employing a non–uniform discretization and gathering the finite difference (FD) weighting coe cients into differentiation matrices. In fact, a non–uniform discretization of the 3D computational domain is employed to achieve the second–order of accuracy for all the spatial variables. It is contributed that under what conditions the proposed procedure is stable. This stability bound is novel in literature for solving this model. Several financial experiments are worked out along with computation of the hedging quantities Delta and Gamma.

References

[1] R. Ahlip, M. Rutkowski, Pricing of foreign exchange options under the MPT stochastic volatility model and the CIR interest rates, Euro. J. Finance, 22 (2016), 551–571.10.1080/1351847X.2014.912671
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] K. Atkinson, W. Han, Theoretical Numerical Analysis, A Functional Analysis Framework, Third Edition, Springer, New York, 2009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] J.C. Butcher, Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations, 2nd Edition, Wiley, England, 2008.10.1002/9780470753767
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] J.C. Cox, J.E. Ingersoll, S.A. Ross, A theory of the term structure of interest rates, Econometrica, 53 (1985), 385–407.10.2307/1911242
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] R. Company, V.N. Egorova, M.El. Fakharany, L. Jódar, F. Soleymani, Numerical Analysis of Novel Finite Difference Methods, Novel Methods in Computational Finance, 2017, 171–214.10.1007/978-3-319-61282-9_10
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] E. Ekström, J. Tysk, Boundary conditions for the single–factor term structure equation, Ann. Appl. Prob., 21 (2011), 332–350.10.1214/10-AAP698
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] L. Feng, V. Linetsky, Pricing options in jump–diffusion models: An extrapolation approach, Oper. Res., 56 (2008), 304–325.10.1287/opre.1070.0419
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] B. Fornberg, A Practical Guide to Pseudospectral Methods, Cambridge University Press, UK, 1996.10.1017/CBO9780511626357
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] L.A. Grzelak, C.W. Oosterlee, On the Heston model with stochastic interest rates, SIAM J. Financ. Math., 2 (2011), 255–286.10.1137/090756119
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] S. Hadi Seyedi, B. Nemati Saray, A. Ramazani, On the multiscale simulation of squeezing nanofluid flow by a highprecision scheme, Powder Technol., 340 (2018), 264–273.10.1016/j.powtec.2018.08.088
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] T. Haentjens, E cient and stable numerical solution of the Heston–Cox– Ingersoll–Ross partial differential equation by alternating direction implicit finite difference schemes, Int. J. Comput. Math., 90 (2013), 2409–2430.10.1080/00207160.2013.777710
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] S.L. Heston, A closed–form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options, Rev. Finan. Stud., 6 (1993), 327–343.10.1093/rfs/6.2.327
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] N.J. Higham, Functions of Matrices: Theory and Computation, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2008.10.1137/1.9780898717778
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] J.C. Hull, Options, Futures and other Derivatives, 6th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2006.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] K.J. in ‘t Hout, S. Foulon, ADI finite difference schemes for option pricing in the Heston model with correlation, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model., 7 (2010), 303–320.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] A Itkin, New solvable stochastic volatility models for pricing volatility derivatives, Rev. Der. Res., 16 (2013), 111–134.10.1007/s11147-012-9082-0
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] A. Itkin, Pricing Derivatives Under Lévy Models: Modern Finite– Difference and Pseudo–Differential Operators Approach, Birkhäuser Basel, 2017.10.1007/978-1-4939-6792-6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[18] M.K. Kadalbajoo, A. Kumar, L.P. Tripathi, Radial–basis–function–based finite difference operator splitting method for pricing American options, Int. J. Comput. Math., 95 (2018), 2343–2359.10.1080/00207160.2017.1395870
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[19] R. Kangro, R. Nicolaides, Far field boundary conditions for Black–Scholes equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 38 (2000), 1357–1368.10.1137/S0036142999355921
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[20] T. Kluge, Pricing derivatives in stochastic volatility models using the finite difference method, Dipl. thesis, TU Chemnitz, 2002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[21] R. Knapp, A method of lines framework in Mathematica, J. Numer. Anal. Indust. Appl. Math. (JNAIAM), 3 (2008), 43–59.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[22] S. Milovanović, L. von Sydow, Radial basis function generated finite differences for option pricing problems, Comput. Math. Appl. 75 (2018), 1462–1481.10.1016/j.camwa.2017.11.015
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[23] A.S. Novozhilov, Lecture Notes, Ordinary Differential Equations I, Non– Autonomous Linear Systems of ODE, General theory, USA, pp. 74–86.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[24] E. Rotenstein, A multi-dimensional FBSDE with quadratic generator and its applications, An. Şt. Univ. Ovidius Constanţa, 23 (2015), 213–222.10.1515/auom-2015-0038
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[25] W.J. Rugh, Linear System Theory, Second Edition, New Jersey, 1996.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[26] J. Sippel, S. Ohkoshi, All power to PRDC notes, Risk, 15 (2002), 531–533.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[27] M. Sofroniou, R. Knapp, Advanced Numerical Differential Equation Solving in Mathematica, Wolfram Mathematica, Tutorial Collection, USA, 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[28] F. Soleymani, Pricing multi–asset option problems: A Chebyshev pseudo– spectral method, BIT, 59 (2019), 243–270.10.1007/s10543-018-0722-0
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[29] D. Tavella, C. Randall, Pricing Financial Instruments: The Finite Difference Method, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[30] M. Trott, The Mathematica Guidebook for Numerics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2006.10.1007/0-387-28814-7
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[31] S. Wagon, Mathematica in Action, Third edition, Springer, New York, 2010.10.1007/978-0-387-75477-2
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[32] H. Zhao, X.M. Rong, Y.G. Zhao, Optimal excess–of–loss reinsurance and investment problem for an insurer with jump–diffusion risk process under the Heston model, Insur. Math. Econ., 53 (2013), 504–514.10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.08.004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

On an improved computational solution for the 3D HCIR PDE in finance

Abstract

Paradigm

My account