References
- R. Bonin, F. Khameneifar, and J. R. R. Mayer, “Evaluation of the Metrological Performance of a Handheld 3D Laser Scanner Using a Pseudo-3D Ball-Lattice Artifact,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 6, p. 2137, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21062137.
- S. Voisin, “Study of ambient light influence for three-dimensional scanners based on structured light,” Opt. Eng., vol. 46, no. 3, p. 030502, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1117/1.2717126.
- D. F. Redaelli, S. G. Barsanti, E. Biffi, F. A. Storm, and G. Colombo, “Comparison of geometrical accuracy of active devices for 3D orthopaedic reconstructions,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 114, no. 1–2, pp. 319–342, May 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00170-021-06778-0.
- D. Palousek, M. Omasta, D. Koutny, J. Bednar, T. Koutecky, and F. Dokoupil, “Effect of matte coating on 3D optical measurement accuracy,” Opt. Mater., vol. 40, pp. 1–9, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2014.11.020.
- T. P. Kersten, H.-J. Przybilla, and M. Lindstaedt, “Investigations of the Geometrical Accuracy of Handheld 3D Scanning Systems,” Photogramm. - Fernerkund. - Geoinformation, vol. 2016, no. 5–6, pp. 271–283, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1127/pfg/2016/0305.
- H. Schwenke, U. Neuschaefer-Rube, T. Pfeifer, and H. Kunzmann, “Optical Methods for Dimensional Metrology in Production Engineering,” CIRP Ann., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 685–699, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61707-7.