References
- ALIVERDI, A. – BORGHEI, M. 2021. Spray coverage and biological efficacy of single, twin symmetrical, and twin asymmetrical flat fan nozzles. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 92–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2021-0015
- ALTIERI, A. L. – CRYER, S. A. 2018. Break-up of sprayed emulsions from flat-fan nozzles using a hole kinematics model. In Biosystems Engineering, vol. 169, pp. 104–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.02.006
- ANKEN, T. – SARAVANAN, G. – WALDBURGER, T. – WERTHMÜLLER, J. – WOHLHAUSER, R. – SANDERSON, G. 2024. Transversal distribution of a spray drone applying different nozzles and measuring methods. In Crop Protection, vol. 179, article no. 106603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106603
- BALSARI, P. – GRELLA, M. – MARUCCO, P. – MATTA, F. – MIRANDA-FUENTES, A. 2019. Assessing the influence of air speed and liquid flow rate on the droplet size and homogeneity in pneumatic spraying. In Pest Management Science, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 366–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5120
- CUI, L. – MAO, H. – XUE, X. – DING, S. – QIAO, B. 2018. Optimized design and test for a pendulum suspension of the crop sprayer boom in dynamic conditions based on a six DOF motion simulator. In International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 76–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20181103.3717
- CUI, L. – MAO, H. – XUE, X. 2019. Hydraulic-drive roll movement control of a spray boom using adaptive robust control strategy. In Advances in Mechanical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 2. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018825012
- ISO 5682-2 2017: Equipment for crop protection. Spraying equipment. Part 2: Test methods to assess the horizontal transverse distribution for hydraulic sprayers.
- ISO 5682-3 2017: Equipment for crop protection. Spraying equipment. Part 3: Test method to assess the performance of volume/area adjustment systems.
- KRAWCZUK, A. – PARAFINIUK, S. – PRZYWARA, A. – HUYGHEBAERT, B. – RABIER, F. – LIMBOURG, Q. – MOSTADE, O. – KOCIRA, S. 2021. Technical parameters of spraying with a biostimulant as a determinant of biometrical properties and yield of soybean seeds. In Agricultural Engineering, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 171–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/agriceng-2021-0014
- KULKARNI, A. P. – DESHMUKH, D. 2017. Spatial drop-sizing in airblast atomization – an experimental study. In Atomization and Sprays, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 949–961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.2017021428
- LODWIK, D. – PIETRZYK, J. – MALESA, W. 2020. Analysis of volume distribution and evaluation of the spraying spectrum in terms of spraying quality. In Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 7, article no. 2935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072395
- MANEA, D. – GIDEA, M. – MARIN, E. – MATEESCU, M. 2018. Simulation of mechanical parameters of sprayer boom. In Proceedings 17th International Scientific Conference “Engineering for Rural Development”. Jelgava, Latvia, pp. 45–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N048
- MAKHNENKO, I. – ALONZI, E. R. – FREDERICKS, S. A. – COLBY, C. M. – DUTCHER, C. S. 2021. A review of liquid sheet breakup: Perspectives from agricultural sprays. In Journal of Aerosol Science, vol. 157, article no. 105805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105805
- MANZONE, M. – DEMENEGHI, M. – MARUCCO, P. – GRELLA, M. – BALSARI, P. 2020. Technical solutions for under-row weed control in vineyards: Efficacy, costs and environmental aspects analysis. In Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 51, no 1, pp. 36–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2020.991
- NOVÁK, P. – CHYBA, J. – KROULÍK, M. – MAŠEK, J. 2014. Dosage uniformity of rainfall simulator depending on nozzle type and pressure. In Proceedings 17th International Scientific Conference “Engineering for Rural Development”. Jelgava, Latvia, pp. 69–73.
- NOWAKOWSKI, T. 2007. Selected technical parameters influencing the quality of spraying. In Annals of Warsaw Agricultural University – SGGW. Agriculture no. 50 (Agricultural Engineering), 50, pp. 33–38.
- OCHOWIAK, M. – KRUPIŃSKA, A. – WŁODARCZAK, S. – MATUSZAK, M. – MARKOWSKA, M. – JANCZAREK, M. – SZULC, T. 2020. The two-phase conical swirl atomizers: spray characteristics. In Energies, vol. 13, no. 13, article no. 3416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133416
- OOMS, D. – RUTER, R. – LEBEAU, F. – DESTAIN, M.-F. 2003. Impact of the horizontal movements of a sprayer boom on the longitudinal spray distribution in field conditions. In Crop Protection, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 813–820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(03)00045-0
- PARAFINIUK, S. – TARASIŃSKA, J. 2013. Work simulation of the sprayer field beam with the use of R program. In Journal of Central European Agriculture, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1019–1028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01//14.3.1298
- ISO 16122. 2015. Agricultural and forestry machinery. Inspection of sprayers in use. Part 1: General.
- ROTEN, R. L. – HEWITT, A. J. – LEDEBUHR, M. – THISTLE, H. – CONNELL, R. J. – WOLF, T. M. – SANKAR, S. – WOODWARD, S. J. R. 2013. Evaluation of spray deposition in potatoes using various spray delivery systems. In New Zealand Plant Protection, vol. 66, pp. 317–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.2014.67.5780
- SIKKA, R. – VÅGSÆTHER, K. – BJERKETVEDT, D. – LUNDBERG, J. 2022. Experimental investigation on the spray behaviour of bluff body air-assisted atomizer designs. In Fluids, vol. 7, no. 9, article no. 301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7090301
- ŚWIECHOWSKI, W. – HOŁOWNICKI, R. – GODYŃ, A. – DORUCHOWSKI, G. 2015. Effect of spray application parameters on the airborne drift. In Agricultural Engineering, vol. 2(154), pp. 119–126. DOI: http://dx.medra.org/10.14654/ir.2015.154.127
- TANBAYEV, K. – NUKESHEV, S. – ENGIN, T. – SAKTAGANOV, B. 2023. Flat spray nozzle for intra-soil application of liquid mineral fertilizers. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 65–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2023-0009
- WANG, C. – WONGSUK, S. – HUANG, Z. – YU, C. – HAN, L. – ZHANG, J. – SUN, W. – ZENG, A. – HE, X. 2023. Comparison between drift test bench and other techniques in spray drift evaluation of an eight-rotor unmanned aerial spraying system: the influence of meteorological parameters and nozzle types. In Agronomy, vol. 13, no. 1, article no. 270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010270
- WANG, J. – LIANG, Q. – ZENG, T. – ZHANG, X. – FU, W. – LAN, Y. 2022. Drift potential characteristics of a flat fan nozzle: a numerical and experimental study. In Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 12, article no. 6092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126092
- VALLET, A. – TINET, C. 2013. Characteristics of droplets from single and twin jet air induction nozzles: A preliminary investigation. In Crop Protection, vol. 48, pp. 63–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.02.010
- VIŠACKI, V. – SEDLAR, A. – BUGARIN, R. – TURAN, J. – BURG, P. 2017. Effect of pressure on the uniformity of nozzles transverse distribution and mathematical model development. In Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 563–568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201765020563
- YAN, J. – XUE, X. – CUI, L. – DING, S. – GU, W. – LE, F. 2021. Analysis of dynamic behavior of spray boom under step excitation. In Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 21, article no. 10129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110129
- YARPUZ-BOZDOGAN, N. – BOZDOGAN, A. M. 2009. Comparison of field and model percentage drift using different types of hydraulic nozzles in pesticide applications. In International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 6, pp. 191–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327621