ABDULLA, Z. B. – SEDEEQ, A. M. – KHORSHID, F. F. 2022. Effects of forward speeds and blade angles of potato digger on fuel consumption and tuber mechanical damages. In Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 21–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33899/magrj.2022.133565.1170
AL-DOSARY, N. M. N. 2016. Potato harvester performance on tuber damage at the eastern of Saudi Arabia. In Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 32–42. Available at: https://cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejounral/article/view/3401/2342
ALSHARIFI, S. K. A. – ALJIBOURI, M. A. – TAHER, M. A. 2019. Effect of two types of digger machines and speeds of tractor on the qualitative characteristics of potato. In Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 308–322. Available at: https://www.fayoum.edu.eg/Agri/conference3/pdf/Researches/E/22.pdf
ARAFA, G. K. 2019. Some factors affecting the damage of potato tubers during harvest. In Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 753–772. Available at: https://mjae.journals.ekb.eg/article_94776_91fe3f945655ccf6cfa778c0e8c25317.pdf
ARAFA, G. K. 2007. The effect of harvesting operation on potato crop handling. In Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 492–503. Available at: http://www.mjae.eg.net/pdf/2007/july/3.pdf
BAIO, F. H. R. – ANTUNIASSI, U. R. – BALASTREIRE, L. A. – CAIXETA FILHO, J. V. 2004. Linear programming model for agricultural boom sprayer selection. In Engenharia Agrícola, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 355–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162004000200014
BANGAR, V. T. – JADHAV, S. R. – PATIL, K. D. – BIRADAR, V. U. – OSTWAL, R. S. 2016. Design and development of potato harvester. In International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 3343–3347. Available at: http://ijariie.com/AdminUploadPdf/DESIGN_AND_DEVELOPMENT_OF_POTATO_HARVESTER_ijariie2586.pdf
BARITELLE, A. – HYDE, G. – THORNTON, R. – BAJEMA, R. 2000. A classification system for impact-related defects in potato tubers. In American Journal of Potato Research, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 143–148. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02853938
BENTINI, M. – CAPRARA, C. – MARTELLI, R. 2006. Harvesting damage to potato tubers by analysis of impacts recorded with an instrumented sphere. In Biosystems Engineering, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 75–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.02.007
BERNIK, R. – GODEŠA, T. – DOLNIČAR, P. – VUČAJNK, F. 2010. Potato yield and tuber quality in 75 cm and 90 cm wide ridges. In Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 175–81. Available at: http://aas.bf.uni-lj.si/julij2010/07bernik.pdf
BOHL, W. H. – JOHNSON, S. B. 2010. Commercial Potato Production in North America: The Potato Association of America Handbook, 2nd ed. New York : Potato Association of America, 85 pp. Available at: https://vric.ucdavis.edu/pdf/POTATOES/Commercial%20Potato%20Production%20in%20North%20America%202010.pdf
BULGAKOV, V. – IVANOVS, S. – SAFCHENKO, I. – BORIS, A. – RYCHLIVSKYJ, P. 2019. Theoretical research of the design and technological parameters of a device for lifting of deep-seated table root crops. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 99–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2019-0018
CHEHAIBI, S. – HAMDI, W. – ABROUGUI, K. 2013. Effects of planting depth on agronomic performance of two potato varieties grown in the Sahel region of Tunisia. In Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 272–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JDAE12.116
DA CUNHA, J. P. A. R. – MARTINS, D. H. – DA CUNHA, W. G. 2011. Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest. In Engenharia Agrícola, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 826–834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162011000400020
FAO. 2021. World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2021. Rome : Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 353 pp. ISSN 2225-7373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4477en
FRANČÁK, J. – KORENKO, M. – KUBOŃ, M. 2012. Innovative solutions in potato harvesting techniques. In Inżynieria Rolnicza (Agricultural Engineering), vol. 4, no. 140, pp. 19–24.
GHALI, A. A. 2019. Effecting digger machine (John Deere type), soil moisture content and tractor speeds on some qualitative characteristics of potato. In Euphrates Journal of Agriculture Science, vol. 11, no 2. pp. 22–31. Available at: https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/487e144239e4d6ec
ISSA, I. I. M. – ZHANG, Z. – EL-KOLALY, W. – YANG, X. – WANG, H. 2020. Design, ANSYS analysis and performance evaluation of potato digger harvester. In International Agricultural Engineering Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 60–73.
KHAN, A. A. – JILANI, M. S. – KHAN, M. Q. – ZUBAIR, M. 2011. Effect of seasonal variation on tuber bulking rate of potato. In The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31–37. Available at: http://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/21(1)2011/EFFECT-OF-SEASONAL.pdf
KHANI, M. – PAYMAN, S. H. – PIRMORADIAN, N. 2021. Development of a pilot soil-water balance model for determination of probability of a working day for rice harvesting. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 55–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2021-0009
KHEIRY, A. N. O. – ELSSIR, A. – RAHMA, A. E. – MOHAMED, M. A. – OMER, E. A. –DONG, H. J. – LIWEI, Y. 2018. Effect of operation variables of potato digger with double chain conveyors on crop handling and machine performance. In International Journal of Environmental and Agriculture Research, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 87–101. Available at: https://ijoear.com/assets/articles_menuscripts/file/IJOEAR-APR-2018-6.pdf
KUMAR, D. – TRIPATHI, A. 2017. Performance evaluation of tractor drawn potato digger cum-elevator. In International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 433–448. Available at: http://www.tjprc.org/publishpapers/2-50-1490605027-55.IJASRAPR201755.pdf
MORAD, M. M. – ALI, M. M. A. – EL-SHAL, H. M. – EL-GENDY, S. L. A. 2015. Comparative study between some different potato harvesting machine in small holdings. In Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 479–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2015.98576
MULLINS, E. – MILBOURNE, D. – PETTI, C. – DOYLE-PRESTWICH, B. M. – MEADE, C. 2006. Potato in the age of biotechnology. In Trends in Plant Science, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 254–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.03.002
NARENDER – RANI, V. – MUKESH, S. – KUMAR, A. – SHARMA, P. 2019. Optimization of performance parameters of root crop digger for potato crop. In Current Agriculture Research Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 276–282. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.7.2.16
SEDDIQ, A. M. A. 2012. Effect of methods and timing removal of potato crop vegetative part in the quantitative and qualitative loss with two kinds of lifters. In Journal of Kirkuk University for Agricultural Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 169–186.
SÖĞÜT, T. – ÖZTÜRK, F. 2011. Effects of harvesting time on some yield and quality traits of different maturing potato cultivars. In African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 38, pp. 7349–7355.Available at: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/94768
STRECK, N. A. – LAGO, I. – ALBERTO, C. M. – BISOGNIN, D. A. 2006. Simulation of potato cultivar Asterix development under five climate change scenarios in Santa Maria. In Bragantia, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 693–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052006000400021
TAWFIK, M. A. – ABDELLAH, Y. S. 2012. Fabricating a prototype of potato digger to suit small holdings. In Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 705–724. Available at: https://mjae.journals.ekb.eg/article_102335.html
YOUNUS, A. – JAYAN, P. R. 2015. Performance evaluation of root crop harvesters. In International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 38-52. Available at: http://www.ijerd.com/paper/vol11-issue6/Version_1/F1163852.pdf
ZHANG, F. – QIU, Z. – MAO, P. – XU, R. – JUN, W. 2011. The model and simulation of the potato harvester. In Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 44–47, pp. 900–904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.44-47.900