Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Study of the Effect of Potato Lifter Line on Some Properties at Different Depths and Varieties of Potato Crop

Open Access
|May 2023

References

  1. ABDULLA, Z. B. – SEDEEQ, A. M. – KHORSHID, F. F. 2022. Effects of forward speeds and blade angles of potato digger on fuel consumption and tuber mechanical damages. In Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 21–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33899/magrj.2022.133565.1170
  2. AL-DOSARY, N. M. N. 2016. Potato harvester performance on tuber damage at the eastern of Saudi Arabia. In Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 32–42. Available at: https://cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejounral/article/view/3401/2342
  3. ALSHARIFI, S. K. A. – ALJIBOURI, M. A. – TAHER, M. A. 2019. Effect of two types of digger machines and speeds of tractor on the qualitative characteristics of potato. In Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 308–322. Available at: https://www.fayoum.edu.eg/Agri/conference3/pdf/Researches/E/22.pdf
  4. ARAFA, G. K. 2019. Some factors affecting the damage of potato tubers during harvest. In Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 753–772. Available at: https://mjae.journals.ekb.eg/article_94776_91fe3f945655ccf6cfa778c0e8c25317.pdf
  5. ARAFA, G. K. 2007. The effect of harvesting operation on potato crop handling. In Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 492–503. Available at: http://www.mjae.eg.net/pdf/2007/july/3.pdf
  6. BAIO, F. H. R. – ANTUNIASSI, U. R. – BALASTREIRE, L. A. – CAIXETA FILHO, J. V. 2004. Linear programming model for agricultural boom sprayer selection. In Engenharia Agrícola, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 355–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162004000200014
  7. BANGAR, V. T. – JADHAV, S. R. – PATIL, K. D. – BIRADAR, V. U. – OSTWAL, R. S. 2016. Design and development of potato harvester. In International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 3343–3347. Available at: http://ijariie.com/AdminUploadPdf/DESIGN_AND_DEVELOPMENT_OF_POTATO_HARVESTER_ijariie2586.pdf
  8. BARITELLE, A. – HYDE, G. – THORNTON, R. – BAJEMA, R. 2000. A classification system for impact-related defects in potato tubers. In American Journal of Potato Research, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 143–148. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02853938
  9. BENTINI, M. – CAPRARA, C. – MARTELLI, R. 2006. Harvesting damage to potato tubers by analysis of impacts recorded with an instrumented sphere. In Biosystems Engineering, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 75–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.02.007
  10. BERNIK, R. – GODEŠA, T. – DOLNIČAR, P. – VUČAJNK, F. 2010. Potato yield and tuber quality in 75 cm and 90 cm wide ridges. In Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 175–81. Available at: http://aas.bf.uni-lj.si/julij2010/07bernik.pdf
  11. BOHL, W. H. – JOHNSON, S. B. 2010. Commercial Potato Production in North America: The Potato Association of America Handbook, 2nd ed. New York : Potato Association of America, 85 pp. Available at: https://vric.ucdavis.edu/pdf/POTATOES/Commercial%20Potato%20Production%20in%20North%20America%202010.pdf
  12. BULGAKOV, V. – IVANOVS, S. – SAFCHENKO, I. – BORIS, A. – RYCHLIVSKYJ, P. 2019. Theoretical research of the design and technological parameters of a device for lifting of deep-seated table root crops. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 99–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2019-0018
  13. CHEHAIBI, S. – HAMDI, W. – ABROUGUI, K. 2013. Effects of planting depth on agronomic performance of two potato varieties grown in the Sahel region of Tunisia. In Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 272–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JDAE12.116
  14. DA CUNHA, J. P. A. R. – MARTINS, D. H. – DA CUNHA, W. G. 2011. Operational performance of the mechanized and semi-mechanized potato harvest. In Engenharia Agrícola, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 826–834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162011000400020
  15. FAO. 2021. World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2021. Rome : Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 353 pp. ISSN 2225-7373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4477en
  16. FRANČÁK, J. – KORENKO, M. – KUBOŃ, M. 2012. Innovative solutions in potato harvesting techniques. In Inżynieria Rolnicza (Agricultural Engineering), vol. 4, no. 140, pp. 19–24.
  17. GHALI, A. A. 2019. Effecting digger machine (John Deere type), soil moisture content and tractor speeds on some qualitative characteristics of potato. In Euphrates Journal of Agriculture Science, vol. 11, no 2. pp. 22–31. Available at: https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/487e144239e4d6ec
  18. ISSA, I. I. M. – ZHANG, Z. – EL-KOLALY, W. – YANG, X. – WANG, H. 2020. Design, ANSYS analysis and performance evaluation of potato digger harvester. In International Agricultural Engineering Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 60–73.
  19. KHAN, A. A. – JILANI, M. S. – KHAN, M. Q. – ZUBAIR, M. 2011. Effect of seasonal variation on tuber bulking rate of potato. In The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31–37. Available at: http://www.thejaps.org.pk/docs/21(1)2011/EFFECT-OF-SEASONAL.pdf
  20. KHANI, M. – PAYMAN, S. H. – PIRMORADIAN, N. 2021. Development of a pilot soil-water balance model for determination of probability of a working day for rice harvesting. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 55–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2021-0009
  21. KHEIRY, A. N. O. – ELSSIR, A. – RAHMA, A. E. – MOHAMED, M. A. – OMER, E. A. –DONG, H. J. – LIWEI, Y. 2018. Effect of operation variables of potato digger with double chain conveyors on crop handling and machine performance. In International Journal of Environmental and Agriculture Research, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 87–101. Available at: https://ijoear.com/assets/articles_menuscripts/file/IJOEAR-APR-2018-6.pdf
  22. KUMAR, D. – TRIPATHI, A. 2017. Performance evaluation of tractor drawn potato digger cum-elevator. In International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 433–448. Available at: http://www.tjprc.org/publishpapers/2-50-1490605027-55.IJASRAPR201755.pdf
  23. MORAD, M. M. – ALI, M. M. A. – EL-SHAL, H. M. – EL-GENDY, S. L. A. 2015. Comparative study between some different potato harvesting machine in small holdings. In Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 479–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2015.98576
  24. MULLINS, E. – MILBOURNE, D. – PETTI, C. – DOYLE-PRESTWICH, B. M. – MEADE, C. 2006. Potato in the age of biotechnology. In Trends in Plant Science, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 254–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.03.002
  25. NARENDER – RANI, V. – MUKESH, S. – KUMAR, A. – SHARMA, P. 2019. Optimization of performance parameters of root crop digger for potato crop. In Current Agriculture Research Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 276–282. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.7.2.16
  26. SABZ DASHT COMPANY. Agricultural machines. Available at: http://www.sabzdasht.ir/sdasht/category/catid/110/lang/en#cat110
  27. SEDDIQ, A. M. A. 2012. Effect of methods and timing removal of potato crop vegetative part in the quantitative and qualitative loss with two kinds of lifters. In Journal of Kirkuk University for Agricultural Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 169–186.
  28. SÖĞÜT, T. – ÖZTÜRK, F. 2011. Effects of harvesting time on some yield and quality traits of different maturing potato cultivars. In African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 38, pp. 7349–7355.Available at: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/94768
  29. STRECK, N. A. – LAGO, I. – ALBERTO, C. M. – BISOGNIN, D. A. 2006. Simulation of potato cultivar Asterix development under five climate change scenarios in Santa Maria. In Bragantia, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 693–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052006000400021
  30. TAWFIK, M. A. – ABDELLAH, Y. S. 2012. Fabricating a prototype of potato digger to suit small holdings. In Misr Journal of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 705–724. Available at: https://mjae.journals.ekb.eg/article_102335.html
  31. YOUNUS, A. – JAYAN, P. R. 2015. Performance evaluation of root crop harvesters. In International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 38-52. Available at: http://www.ijerd.com/paper/vol11-issue6/Version_1/F1163852.pdf
  32. ZHANG, F. – QIU, Z. – MAO, P. – XU, R. – JUN, W. 2011. The model and simulation of the potato harvester. In Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 44–47, pp. 900–904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.44-47.900
Language: English
Page range: 108 - 114
Published on: May 23, 2023
Published by: Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2023 Othman M. M. Tofeq, published by Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.