Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Modelling of Impulse Functions of Ultrasonic Sensors When Tilt Angle of Reflecting Surface is Changed Cover

Modelling of Impulse Functions of Ultrasonic Sensors When Tilt Angle of Reflecting Surface is Changed

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. FIKAR, M. – MIKLEŠ, J. 1999. Identification of Systems. Bratislava : STU, 114 pp. ISBN 8022711772 (In Slovak: Identifikácia systémov)
  2. HRUBÝ, D. – VACHO, L. – KUBÍK, Ľ. – TÓTH, L. – BALÁŽI, J. – KÓSA, P. – KIŠEV, M. 2022. Characteristics of distance errors of infrared sensor relation to colour surfaces. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 40–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ata-2022-0007
  3. ISHIKARA, M. – SHIINA, M. – SUZUKI, S. 2009. Evaluation of method of measuring distance between object and walls using ultrasonic sensors. In Journal of Asian Electric Vehicles, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1207–1211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4130/jaev.7.1207
  4. KEYSIGHT. 2021. Keysight U2300A Series USB Multifunction Data Acquisition Devices. Malaysia : Keysight Technologies, 84 pp.
  5. KUC, R. – SIEGEL, M. 1987. Physically based simulation model for acoustic sensor robot navigation. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 766–778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1987.4767983
  6. LENDELOVÁ, J. – CVIKLOVIČ, V. – OLEJÁR, M. – POGRAN, Š. 2017. Animal Position Identification Logging System. Slovak patent no. 288467 (In Slovak: Záznamový systém polohovej identifikácie zvierat)
  7. LIM, J. H. – LEONARD, J. J. 2000. Mobile robot relocation from echolocation constraints. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1035–1041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/34.877524
  8. LU, Z. 2014. Estimating time-of-flight of multi-superimposed ultrasonic echo signal through envelope. In 2014 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks. Bhopal : IEEE, pp. 300–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CICN.2014.74
  9. MARTÍNEZ, M. – BENET, G. – BLANES, F. – PÉREZ, P. – SIMÓ, J. E. 2003. Using the amplitude of ultrasonic echoes to classify detected objects in a scene. In ICAR 2003 : Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Advanced Robotics. Coimbra : University of Coimbra. ISBN 9789729688997
  10. MARTÍNEZ, M. – BENET, G. – BLANES, F. – SIMÓ, J. E. – PÉREZ, P. – POZA, J. L. 2004. Wall/corner classification. A new ultrasonic amplitude-based approach. In IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 663–668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)32054-2
  11. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY. 2014. TC4426/TC4427/TC4428. Datasheet. 28 pp. Available at: https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/20001422G.pdf
  12. MOREIRA, T. F. M. – LIMA, J. – COSTA, P. – CUNHA, M. 2020. Low Cost Binaural System Based on the Echolocation. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics – Volume 1: ICINCO. Setúbal : SciTePress, pp. 818–825. ISBN 9783030361495
  13. PARE, A. – ZHANG, S. – LEI, Z. 2020. Multipath interference suppression in time-of-flight sensors by exploiting the amplitude envelope of the transmission signal. In IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 167527–167536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3023083
  14. PRO-WAWE. 2005. 400ST/R160. Air Ultrasonic Ceramic Transducers. Available at: http://www.prowave.com.tw/index.htm
  15. QIU, Z. – LU, Y. – QIU, Z. 2022. Review of ultrasonic ranging methods and their current challenges. In Micromachines, vol. 13, no. 4, article no. 520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13040520
  16. RABADAN, J. – GUERRA, V. – RODRÍGUEZ, R. – RUFO, J. – LUNA-RIVERA, M. – PEREZ-JIMENEZ, R. 2017. Hybrid visible light and ultrasound-based sensor for distance estimation. In Sensors, vol. 17, no. 2, article no. 330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s17020330
  17. SHIN, S. – KIM, M.-H. – CHOI, S. B. 2019. Ultrasonic distance measurement method with crosstalk rejection at high measurement rate. In IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 972–979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2018.2863999
  18. SMITH, S. W. 1999. The Scientist and Engineer‘s Guide to Digital Signal Processing. San Diego : California Technical Publishing, 650 pp. ISBN 0966017668
  19. UREÑA, J. – MAZO, M. – GARCÍA, J. J. – HERNÁNDEZ, Á. – BUENO, E. 1999. Classification of reflectors with an ultrasonic sensor for mobile robot applications. In Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 269–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(99)00059-7
  20. WEBSTER, J. G. – EREN, H. 2014. Measurement, Instrumentation and Sensors Handbook. New York : CRC Press, 1600 pp. ISBN 9781439848883
  21. XU, B. – YU, L. – GIURGIUTIU, V. 2009. Advanced methods for time-of-flight estimation with application to lamb wave structural health monitoring. In Structural Health Monitoring 2009: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (2 Volume Set). Lancaster : DEStech Publications, Inc., pp. 1202–1209. ISBN 9781605950075
  22. YATA, T. – OHYA, A. – YUTA, S. 2000. Use of amplitude of echo for environment recognition by mobile robots. In Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Takamatsu : IEEE, pp. 1298–1303. ISBN 0-7803-6348-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2000.893198
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 8
Published on: Mar 27, 2023
Published by: Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Vladimír Madola, Vladimír Cviklovič, Krzysztof Rokosz, published by Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.