Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of the New Digital Side Mirror Technology from Driver’s Subjective Point of View Considering Traffic Safety Cover

Assessment of the New Digital Side Mirror Technology from Driver’s Subjective Point of View Considering Traffic Safety

Open Access
|Aug 2022

References

  1. ACOCK, A. C. – STAVIG, G. R. 1979. A Measure of association for nonparametric statistics. In Social Forces, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1381–1386.
  2. AYOUB, H. S. – HUSSEIN, W. M. – ELBASHAR, Y. H. 2021. Investigation of automotive digital mirrors ergonomics through laser shadowgraphy and driver’s real-road test questionnaire. In Journal of Optics-India, vol. 50, pp. 95–108.
  3. BECK, D. – JUNG, J. – PARK, W. 2021. Evaluating the effects of in-vehicle side-view display layout design on physical demands of driving. In Human Factors, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 348–363.
  4. BECK, D. – LEE, M. – PARK, W. 2017. A comparative evaluation of in-vehicle side view displays layouts in critical lane changing situation. In Ergonomics, vol. 60, no.12, pp. 1682–1691.
  5. BENJAMIN, W. J. 2006. Borish’s Clinical Refraction. Oxford : Butterworth-Heinemann, 1712 pp. ISBN 9780750675246.
  6. BROOKHUIS, K. A. – DE WAARD, D. – JANSSEN, W. H. 2001. Behavioural impacts of advanced driver assistance systems – an overview. In European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 245–253.
  7. CAPPARELLA, J. 2018. Lexus ES will be the first car to replace side mirrors with cameras. Car and driver. Available at: https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a23103910/lexus-es-side-mirror-camera-digital/
  8. CRAMER, H. 1946. Mathematical Methods of Statistics (PMS-9). Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press, 575 pp. ISBN 0691080046
  9. EN ISO 16505: 2019. Ergonomic and performance aspects of Camera Monitor Systems — Requirements and test procedures.
  10. FEELWORLD. 2017. FEELWORLD F570 5.7 Inch Small 4K HDMI on Camera field Monitor. Product catalogue. Available at: http://www.feelworld.cn/ShowInfo.aspx?id=519&py=
  11. FERGUSON, M. – MOHAMED, M. – HIGGINS, C. D. – ABOTALEBI, E. – KANAROGLOU, P. 2018. How open are Canadian households to electric vehicles? A national latent class choice analysis with willingness-to-pay and metropolitan characterization. In Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 58, pp. 208–224.
  12. GLASSER, A. 2006. Surgical restoration of accommodation in presbyopia. In Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 12–18.
  13. HACKBARTH, A. – MADLENER, R. 2018. Combined vehicle type and fuel type choices of private households: an empirical analysis for Germany. FCN Working Paper no. 17/2018.10.2139/ssrn.3552748
  14. HÄNE, C. – HENG, L. – LEE, G. H. – FRAUNDORFER, F. – FURGALE, P. – SATTLER, T. – POLLEFEYS, M. 2017. 3D visual perception for self-driving cars using a multi-camera system: calibration, mapping, localization, and obstacle detection. In Image and Vision Computing, vol. 68, pp. 14–27.
  15. HONG, S. J. – LUI, C. S. M. – HAHN, J. – MOON, J. Y. – KIM, T. G. 2013. How old are you really? Cognitive age in technology acceptance. In Decision Support Systems, vol. 56, pp. 122–130.
  16. KIM, H. – LEE, J. – KIM, D. K. 2006. The impact of age and health on vehicle choices among elders. In Journal of Family and Economic Issues, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 437–457.
  17. LARGE, D. R. – CRUNDALL, E. – BURNETT, G. – HARVEY, C. – KONSTANTOPOULOS, P. 2016. Driving without wings: The effect of different digital mirror locations on the visual behaviour, performance and opinions of drivers. In Applied Ergonomics, vol. 55, pp. 138–148.
  18. LIAO, F. – MOLIN, E. – AN WEE, B. 2017. Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: A literature review. In Transport Reviews, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 252–275.
  19. LU, M. – WEVERS, K. – VAN DER HEIJDEN, R. 2005. Technical feasibility of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) for road traffic safety. In Transportation Planning and Technology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 167–187.
  20. MCHUGH, M. L. 2013. The Chi-square test of independence. In Biochemia Medica, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 143–149.
  21. MURATA, A. – KOHNO, Y. 2018. Effectiveness of replacement of automotive side mirrors by in-vehicle LCD-effect of location and size of LCD on safety and efficiency. In International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 66, pp. 177–186.
  22. NHTSA: 2010. 49 CFR Parts 571 and 585. Federal motor vehicle safety standard, 221 pp. Available at: https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/fmvss/Rear_Visibility_NPRM_12032010.pdf
  23. PAMPEL, S. M. – NOFAL, T. – BURNETT, G. 2018. A preliminary simulator study to investigate the effects of digital mirror failures on driving and glance behaviour, situation awareness, criticality and trust. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention, Gothenburg : SAFER, IFSTTAR & ARRB, pp. 1–6.
  24. PAMPEL, S. M. – SOUTHEY, T. J. R. – BURNETT, G. 2020. Understanding the distraction and behavioural adaptations of drivers when experiencing failures of digital side mirrors. In IET Intelligent Transport Systems, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 775–782.
  25. PARK, H. 2017. A rear-view side mirror with exterior lens to improve field of view and aerodynamics of automobiles. In SAE Technical Paper, pp. 1–5.
  26. RAHMANI, D. – LOUREIRO, M. L. 2019. Assessing drivers’ preferences for hybrid electric vehicles (HEV) in Spain. In Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 73, pp. 89–97.
  27. POLISHCHUK, Y. V. – ASTAFYEV, V. L. – DEREPASKIN, A. I. – KOSTYUCHENKOV, N.V – LAPTEV, N. V. – KOMAROV, A. P. 2021. Impacts of automatic and parallel driving systems on the productivity of machine-tractor units in the Northern region of the Republic of Kazakhstan. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 143–149.
  28. REGAN, M. A. – HORBERRY, T. – STEVENS, A. 2017. Driver acceptance of new technology: Theory, measurement and optimisation. Farnham Surrey, Burlington, Vt : Ashgate Publishing Company, 384 pp. ISBN 9781138077034.
  29. SAE J826: 2008. Devices for use in defining and measuring vehicle seating accommodation – SAE International.
  30. SANCHEZ, M. E. 1992. Effects of questionnaire design on the quality of survey data. In Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 206.
  31. SHINGHAL, N. – FOWKES, T. 2002. Freight mode choice and adaptive stated preferences. In Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 367–378.
  32. SONY. 2019. RX0 II premium tiny tough camera | DSC-RX0M2 | Sony US. Product catalogue. Available at: https://www.sony.cz/electronics/kompaktni-fotoaparaty-cyber-shot/dsc-rx0m2
  33. UNITED NATIONS. 2012. Un Ece 12. Department of Transportation: October, pp. 1–43.
  34. VAN DER LAAN, J. D. – HEINO, A. – DE WAARD, D. 1997. A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. In Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–10.
  35. VIPUTSAKUL, S. – LARGE, D. R. – BURNETT, G. 2020. Enhancing drivers’ awareness of passing pedestrians with exocentric digital mirrors. In Contemporary Ergonomics & Human Factors, pp. 1–4.
  36. WANG, Y. – LI, P. – GUPTA, U. – OUYANG, J. – ZHU, J. 2021. Tunable soft lens of large focal length change. In Soft Robotics. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34388046.
  37. WASSERSTEIN, R. L. – LAZAR, N. A. 2016. The ASA statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. In The American Statistician, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 129–133.
  38. WITTMANN, M. – KISS, M. – GUGG, P. – STEFFEN, A. – FINK, M. – PÖPPEL, E. –KAMIYA, H. 2006. Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving. In Applied Ergonomics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 187–199.
  39. YONG-JU, C. – YONG-SANG, S. – SEUNG-YOP, L. 2018. Aerodynamic analysis and noise-reducing design of an outside rear view mirror. In Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 519.
Language: English
Page range: 122 - 130
Published on: Aug 12, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Sudeep Sangamesh Babu, Jakub Povýšil, Michal Hruška, Petr Vaculík, Petr Benda, Anna Maria Zifia, Martin Fůs, published by Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.