Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Methane Production Potential of Azolla Under Different Ratios of C/N, Chemical and Thermal Pre-Treatment Cover

Methane Production Potential of Azolla Under Different Ratios of C/N, Chemical and Thermal Pre-Treatment

Open Access
|Aug 2020

References

  1. ABDESHAHIAN, P. – LIM, J. S. – HASHIM, H. – LEE, C. T. 2016. Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 60, pp. 714–723.
  2. ADELARD, L. – POULSEN, T. G. – RAKOTONIA, V. 2015. Biogas and methane yield in response to co- and separate digestion of biomass wastes. In Waste Management and Research, vol. 33, pp. 55–62.
  3. ANONYMOUS. 2013. World Energy Council. London.
  4. BASRI, M. F. – YACOB, S. – HASSAN, M. A. – SHIRI, Y. – WAKISAKA, M. – ZAKARIA, M. R. 2010. Improved biogas production from palm oil mill effluent by a scaled down anaerobic treatment process. In World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 26, pp. 505–514.
  5. CARMAN, K. 2008. Prediction of soil compaction under pneumatic tires a using fuzzy logic approach. In Journal of Terramechanics, vol. 45, pp. 103–107.
  6. DAS, D. – SIKDAR, K. – CHETTERJEE, A. K. 1994. Potential of Azolla pinnata as biogas generator and as a fish feed. In Indian Journal of Environmental Health, vol. 36, pp. 186–191.
  7. JANKE, R. – KONG, J. – BRABERG, H. – CANTIN, G. – YATES, J. R. – KROGAN, N. J. – HEYER, W. D. 2016. Nonsense-mediated decay regulates key components of homologous recombination. In Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 5218–30.
  8. KAŽIMÍROVÁ, V. – GADUŠ, J. – GIERTL, T. 2018. Verification of suitability of substrate composition for production and quality of biogas. In Acta Technologica Agriculturae, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 118–121.
  9. PAUDEL, B. 2009. Suitability of Azolla for biogas slurry enrichment. Thesis in M.S., Kerala Agricultural University, Kerala, India.
  10. PHETYIMA, N. – WANTHONGA, T. – KANNIKAA, P. – SUPNGAMA, A. 2015. Biogas production from vegetable waste by using dog and cattle manure. In Energy Procedia, vol. 49, pp. 436–441.
  11. ROY, D. C. – PAKHIRA, M. C. – BERA, S. 2016. A review on biology, cultivation and utilization of Azolla. In Advances in Life Sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–15.
  12. SHILPAKAR, P. – SHILPAKAR, D. 2009. Nutrition of rice through Azolla organic material. In Indian Journal of Agronomy, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 626–633.
  13. TASNIM, F. – AKHTAR, S. – CHOWDHURY, A. R. 2017. Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure with kitchen waste and Water Hyacinth. In Renewable Energy, vol. 109, pp. 434–439.
  14. WILKIE, A. C. 2000. Reducing dairy manure odor and producing energy. In Biocycle, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 48–57.
  15. YADAVA, L. S. – HESSE, R. P. 1981. The development and use of biogas technology in rural area of Asia. Improving soil fertility through organic recycling. FAO project RAS/75/004, no. 10.
  16. ZHANG, J. – ZHANG, M. – SHAN, S. – WANG, M. 2013. Effect of biogas slurry application on grain yield. In Journal of Agro-Environmental Science, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2005–2009.
Language: English
Page range: 126 - 131
Published on: Aug 27, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Majid Fardmanesh, Razieh Pourdarbani, Bahman Najafi, published by Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.