References
- ALONSO M.E., GONZÁLEZ-MONTAÑA J.R., LOMILLOS J.M., 2020 – Consumers’ concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animals 10, 1-13.
- BLOKHUIS H.J., 2008 – International cooperation in animal welfare: the Welfare Quality® project. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 50, S10.
- CAMERLINK I., TURNER S.P., 2017 – Farmers’ perception of aggression between growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, SI: Ethology and sustainability 192, 42-47.
- DUIJVESTEIJN N., BENARD M., REIMERT I., CAMERLINK I., 2014 – Same pig, different conclusions: stakeholders differ in qualitative behaviour assessment. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27, 1019-1047.
- FERNANDES J.N., HEMSWORTH P.H., COLEMAN G.J., 2021 – Costs and benefits of improving farm animal welfare. Agriculture 11(2), 104.
- FLEMING P.A., CLARKE T., WICKHAM S.L., STOCKMAN C.A., BARNES A.L., COLLINS T., MILLER D.W., 2016 – The contribution of qualitative behavioural assessment to appraisal of livestock welfare. Animal Production Science 56, 1569-1578.
- GRUNERT K.G., SONNTAG W.I., GLANZ-CHANOS V., FORUM S., 2018 – Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production : results of a cross-national choice experiment. Meat Science 137, 123-129.
- HANUS G., 2021 – Rationalization as new trend in food behavior of polish consumers. In Eurasian Business Perspectives (eds. Bilgin, M.H., Danis, H., Demir, E., Vale, S.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 347-360.
- HUSSON F., LÊ, S., & PAGÈS, J., 2011 – Exploratory multivariate analysis by example using R Boca Raton: CRC press Vol. 15, 1-60.
- KATT F., MEIXNER O., 2020 – Trends in food science & technology a systematic review of drivers influencing consumer willingness to pay for organic food. Trends in Food Science & Technology 100, 374-388.
- LI S., KALLAS Z., 2021 – Meta-analysis of consumers’ willingness to pay for sustainable food products. Appetite 163, 105239.
- LUDWICZAK A., KASPROWICZ-POTOCKA M., ZAWORSKA-ZAKRZEWSKA A., SKŁADANOWSKA-BARYZA J., RODRIGUEZ-ESTEVEZ V., SANZ-FERNANDEZ S., DIAZ-GAONA C., FERRARI P., JUUL PEDERSEN L., COUTO M.Y.R, REVILLA I., SELL-KUBIAK E., 2023 – Husbandry practices associated with extensification in European pig production and their effects on pork quality. Meat Science 206, 109339.
- MAŁAŻEWSKA S., GAJOS E., 2018 – Animal welfare as a public good in polish opinion. Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists XIX, 153–158.
- MARINOVA D., BÁNÁTI D., BOGUEVA D., 2024 – Flexitarianism: responding to the health and environmental challenges of human diets. In Consumer Perceptions and Food (ed. Bogueva, D.). Springer Nature, Singapore pp. 333-348.
- MOLNÁR M., FRASER D., 2020 – Protecting farm animal welfare during intensification: Farmer perceptions of economic and regulatory pressures. Animal Welfare 29(2), 133-141.
- NEZLEK J.B., FORESTELL C.A., 2020 – Vegetarianism as a social identity. current opinion in food science, sensory science & consumer perception. Food Physics and Material Science 33, 45-51.
- PAWLEWICZ A., 2020 – Change of price premiums trend for organic food products: the example of the polish egg market. Agriculture 10, 35.
- RESANO H., PEREZ-CUETO F.J.A., DE BARCELLOS M.D., VEFLEN-OLSEN N., GRUNERT K.G., VERBEKE,W., 2011 – Consumer satisfaction with pork meat and derived products in five European countries. Appetite 56, 167-170.
- ROUSING T., WEMELSFELDER F., 2006 – Qualitative assessment of social behaviour of dairy cows housed in loose housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101, 40-53.
- SELL-KUBIAK E., LUDWICZAK A., CIELEŃ G., GRUNERT K.G., 2025 – Attitudes of selected Polish consumer groups towards pork and welfare labels. Animal Science and Genetics 21(3), 119-131.
- SZTANDARSKI P., MARCHEWKA J., JASZCZYK A., SOLKA M., MICHNOWSKA H., POGORZELSKI G., STRZAŁKOWSKA N., BARŁOWSKA K., DAMAZIAK K., STELMASIAK A., WÓJCIK W., ADAMEK-URBAŃSKA D., LUDWICZAK A., SELL-KUBIAK E., HORBAŃCZUK J.O., KEMP B., SPOOLDER H., 2025 – Effects of husbandry practices on Ross 308 and Hubbard chicken hybrids welfare: Husbandry effects on broiler welfare. Poultry Science 104(6), 105129.
- TE VELDE H., AARTS N., VAN WOERKUM C., 2002 – Dealing with ambivalence: farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15, 203-219.
- TØNNESEN M.T., GRUNERT K.G., 2021 – Social-psychological determinants of young consumers’ consumption of pork. Food Quality and Preference 93, 104262.
- VANHONACKER F., VERBEKE W., VAN POUCKE E., BUIJS S., TUYTTENS F.A.M., 2009a – Societal concern related to stocking density, pen size and group size in farm animal production. Livestock Science 123, 16-22.
- VANHONACKER F., VERBEKE W., VAN POUCKE E., BUIJS S., TUYTTENS F.A.M., 2009b – Societal concern related to stocking density, pen size and group size in farm animal production. Livestock Science 123, 16-22.
- VERBEKE W., PÉREZ-CUETO F.J.A., BARCELLOS M.D. DE KRYSTALLIS A., GRUNERT K.G., 2010 – European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Science 84, 284-292.
- WEIBLE D., CHRISTOPH-SCHULZ I., SALAMON P., ZANDER K., 2016 – Citizens’ perception of modern pig production in Germany: a mixed-method research approach. British Food Journal 118, 2014-2032.
- WEMELSFELDER F., HUNTER T.E.A., MENDL M.T., LAWRENCE A.B., 2001 – Assessing the ‘whole animal’: a free choice profiling approach. Animal Behaviour 62, 209-220.