Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Efficiency of different instruments used for composite filling polishing. Cover

Efficiency of different instruments used for composite filling polishing.

Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. 1. Bansal K, Gupta S, Nikhil V, Jaiswal S, Jain A, Aggarwal N. Effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of resin composite and enamel: an in vitro profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2019;9(3):154-158.10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_11_19665227931392178
  2. 2. Lesage B, Milnar F, Wohlberg J. Achieving the epitome of composite art: creating natural too esthetics, texture and anatomy using appropriate preparation and layering techniques. Int. Dent S.A. 2009;11: 34–48.
  3. 3. Kameyama A, Nakazawa T, Haruyama A, Haruyama C, Hosaka M, Hirai Y. Influence of finishing/polishing procedures on the surface texture of two resin composites. J. Open Dent. 2008;2:56–60.10.2174/1874210600802010056258153919088883
  4. 4. Yadav RD, Raisingani D, Jindal D, Mathur R. A comparative analysis of different finishing and polishing devices on nanofilled, microfilled, and hybrid composite: a scanning electron microscopy and profilometric study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(3):201-208.10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1364508600627843250
  5. 5. Madhyastha PS, Hegde S, Srikant N, Kotian R, Iyer SS. Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Dental Research Journal. 2017;14(5):326.10.4103/1735-3327.215962565422729109747
  6. 6. Babina K, Polyakova M, Sokhova I, Doroshina V, Arakelyan M, Novozhilova N. The effect of finishing and polishing sequences on the surface roughness of three different nanocomposites and composite/enamel and composite/cementum interfaces. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020;10(7):1339.10.3390/nano10071339740720932659992
  7. 7. Guler AU, Guler E, Yucel AC, Ertas E. Effect of polishing procedures on color stability of resin composites. J. Appl. Oral Sc. 2009;17(2):108–112.10.1590/S1678-77572009000200007
  8. 8. Tosco V, Monterubbianesi R, Orilisi G et al. Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations. Stomatol. 2020;69(4):207-214.10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04310-331633320
  9. 9. Scheibe KG, Almeida KG, Medeiros IS, Costa JF, Alves CM. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2009;17:21–26.10.1590/S1678-77572009000100005
  10. 10. Barbosa H, Zanata RL, Navarro MF, Nunes OB. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable resin composites. Braz.Dent. J. 2005;16:39–44.10.1590/S0103-64402005000100007
  11. 11. Sibel A, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, Antonson DE, Hardigan PC. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent. 2011;39(1):e9-16.10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.00621256180
  12. 12. Nasoohi N, Hoorziad M, Tabatabaei SF. Effects of wet and dry finishing and polishing on surface roughness and microhardness of composite resins. J Dent (Tehran). 2017;14(2):69-75.
  13. 13. Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. J Esthet Restor Dent.2007;19:265–275.10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00116.x17877626
  14. 14. Kritzinger D, Brandt PD, De Wet FA. The effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of a nanocomposite and microhybrid composite. S Afr Dent J. 2017; 72(6):249-257.10.17159/2519-0105/2017/v72no6a1
Language: English
Page range: 31 - 37
Submitted on: Feb 18, 2021
|
Accepted on: Apr 13, 2021
|
Published on: Jun 12, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Andrea-Csinszka Kovacs-Ivacson, Alexandra Mihaela Stoica, Mónika Kovacs, Mihai Pop, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.