Westerlund A, van Diggelen F, Johnsson AC, Kjellberg H. Bonded retainers maintain a high-standard orthodontic treatment outcome long term. J World Fed Orthod 2015;4:78–84.
Nagani NI, Ahmed I, Tanveer F, Khursheed HM, Farooqui WA. Clinical comparison of bond failure rate between two types of mandibular canine-canine bonded orthodontic retainers: A randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2020;20:1–6.
Çokakoğlu S, Adanur-Atmaca R, Çakır M, Öztürk F. Stability and failure rate during 3 years of fixed retention: A follow-up of a randomized clinical trial on adolescents with four different lingual retainers. Orthod Craniofac Res 2024;27:251–8.
Engeler OG, Dalstra M, Arnold DT, Steineck M, Verna C. In vitro comparison of the torsional load transfer of various commercially available stainless-steel wires used for fixed retainers in orthodontics. J Orthod 2021;48:118–26.
Lie Sam Foek DJ, Özcan M, Krebs E, Sandham J. Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: Stainless steel wire versus fiber-reinforced composites. J Adhes Dent 2009;11:381–90.
Husain S, Shantha S, Jain RK, Balasubramaniam AJ. Vacuum-formed retainers versus lingual-bonded retainers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of stability of treatment outcomes in orthodontically treated patients. J Orthod 2022;35:307–22.
Cooke M, Sherriff M. Debonding force and deformation of two multi-stranded lingual retainer wires bonded to incisor enamel: An in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:741–6.
Baysal A, Uysal T, Gul N, Alan MB, Ramoglu SI. Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication. Turkish J Orthod 2012;42:39–46.
Renkema A-M, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C. Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers. Am J Orthod 2011;139:614–21.
O’Rourke N, Albeedh H, Sharma P, Johal A. Effectiveness of bonded and vacuum-formed retainers: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod 2016;150:406–15.
Steinnes J, Johnsen G, Kerosuo H. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome in relation to retention status: an 8-year follow-up. Am J Orthod 2017;151:1027–33.
Möhlhenrich SC, Jäger F, Jäger A, Schumacher P, Wolf M, Fritz U, Bourauel C. Biomechanical properties of CAD/CAM-individualized nickel-titanium lingual retainers: an in vitro study. J Orofac Orthop 2018;79: .
Suzuki T, Kyoizumi H, Finger WJ, Kanehira M, Endo T, Utterodt A, et al. Resistance of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites to toothbrush abrasion with calcium carbonate slurry. Dent Mater 2009;28:708–16.
Sfondrini MF, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ, Viola A, Gandini P, Scribante A. Glass fiber reinforced composite orthodontic retainer: In vitro effect of tooth brushing on the surface wear and mechanical properties. Materials 2020;13:1028.