Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Discrepancy index, treatment complexity index and objective Grading system: correlation between parameters, indices and implications for treatment Cover

Discrepancy index, treatment complexity index and objective Grading system: correlation between parameters, indices and implications for treatment

Open Access
|Jul 2024

References

  1. Campbell CL, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK Jr, Qi R. Treatment outcomes in a graduate orthodontic clinic for cases defined by the American Board of Orthodontics malocclusion categories. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132(6): 822–9.
  2. Arqub SA, Banankhah S, Sharma R, Da Cunha Godoy L, Kuo CL, Ahmed M, et al. Association between initial complexity, frequency of refinements, treatment duration, and outcome in Invisalign orthodontic treatment. <em>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</em> 2022; 162(3): e141–e155.
  3. Richmond S, Shaw WC, O’Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones R, Stephens CD, et al. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14(2): 125–39.
  4. Daniels C, Richmond S. The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). J Orthod 2000; 27(2): 149–62.
  5. Casko JS, Vaden JL, Kokich VG, Damone J, James RD, Cangialosi TJ. Objective grading system for dental casts and panoramic radiographs. American Board of Orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114(5): 589–99.
  6. Cangialosi TJ, Riolo ML, Owens SE Jr, Dykhouse VJ, Moffitt AH, Grubb JE, et al. The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125(3): 270–8.
  7. Vu CQ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK Jr, Ofner S. Treatment complexity index for assessing the relationship of treatment duration and outcomes in a graduate orthodontics clinic. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133(1): 9.e1–e13.
  8. Demidenko E. Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited. Stat Med 2007; 26(18): 3385–97.
  9. Kinaan BK. Overjet and overbite distribution and correlation: a comparative epidemiological English-Iraqi study. Br J Orthod 1986; 13(2): 79–86.
  10. Olliver SJ, Broadbent JM, Prasad S, Cai C, Thomson WM, Farella M. Changes in incisor relationship over the life course—findings from a cohort study. J Dent 2022; 117: 103919.
  11. Tervahauta E, Nokela J, Vuollo V, Pirttiniemi P, Silvola AS. Associations of sagittal malocclusions with dental arch characteristics and crowding in Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. Orthod Craniofac Res 2022; 25(4): 468–75.
  12. Türkkahraman H, Sayin MO. Relationship between mandibular anterior crowding and lateral dentofacial morphology in the early mixed dentition. Angle Orthod 2004; 74(6): 759–64.
  13. Shigenobu N, Hisano M, Shima S, Matsubara N, Soma K. Patterns of dental crowding in the lower arch and contributing factors. A statistical study. Angle Orthod 2007; 77(2): 303–10.
  14. Janson G, Laranjeira V, Rizzo M, Garib D. Posterior tooth angulations in patients with anterior open bite and normal occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 150(1): 71–7.
  15. Rijpstra C, Lisson JA. Etiology of anterior open bite: a review. J Orofac Orthop 2016; 77(4): 281–6.
  16. Langberg BJ, Arai K, Miner RM. Transverse skeletal and dental asymmetry in adults with unilateral lingual posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127(1): 6–15; discussion 15-16
  17. Campos J, Campos M, Caetano PL, Kuchenbecker Rösing C, Farinazzo Vitral RW. The absence of proximal contact point on periodontal parameters of teeth moved into extraction sites. Braz Dent J 2022; 33(3): 74–81.
  18. Zupancic S, Pohar M, Farcnik F, Ovsenik M. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30(3): 269–73.
  19. Yitschaky O, Neuhof MS, Yitschaky M, Zini A. Relationship between dental crowding and mandibular incisor proclination during orthodontic treatment without extraction of permanent mandibular teeth. Angle Orthod 2016; 86(5): 727–33.
  20. Bouwens DG, Cevidanes L, Ludlow JB, Phillips C. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139(1): 126–32.
  21. Alqareer A, Nada R, Ghayyath A, Baghdady M, Allareddy V. The suitability of panoramic radiographs for clinical decision making regarding root angulation compared to cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Med Imaging 2021; 21(1): 89.
  22. Bilgiç F, Hamamci O, Başaran G. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Aust Orthod J 2011; 27(2): 110–6.
  23. Madurantakam P. Fixed or removable function appliances for Class II malocclusions. Evid Based Dent 2016; 17(2): 52–3.
  24. Singh A, Sawant H, Khudare P, Rathod D, Gadhiya N, Narkhede S. A comparative study of skeletal and dental changes in fixed functional and removable functional appliance therapy. Saudi J Oral Dent Res 2020; 5(10): 519–21.
  25. Alfallaj H. Pre-prosthetic orthodontics. Saudi Dent J 2020; 32(1): 7–14.
  26. Han S. The evaluation of treatment difficulty in orthognathic surgery. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 47(5): 339–40.
  27. Incorvati C, Gulotta C, Mirabile F, Badiali G, Marchetti C. Current trends in skeletal borderline patients: surgical versus orthodontic treatment decisions—what is the evidence? Appl Sci 2023; 12(9): 4636.
  28. Doughty F, Pillai S, Hamill D, Amin N, Martin PA. A service evaluation of the multidisciplinary team approach to hypodontia. Br Dent J 2023; 235(7): 514–9.
  29. Erbe C, Heger S, Kasaj A, Berres M, Wehrbein H. Orthodontic treatment in periodontally compromised patients: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2023; 27(1): 79–89.
  30. Parashos P. Endodontic-orthodontic interactions: a review and treatment recommendations. Aust Dent J 2023; 68 (Suppl 1): S66–S81.
  31. Ghiz MA, Ngan P, Gunel E. Cephalometric variables to predict future success of early orthopedic Class III treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127(3): 301–6.
  32. Kim JC, Mascarenhas AK, Joo BH, Vig KW, Beck FM, Vig PS. Cephalometric variables as predictors of Class II treatment outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118(6): 636–40.
  33. Kongboonvijit T, Satrawaha S, Somboonsavatdee A. Factors influencing treatment outcomes assessed by the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS). BMC Oral Health 2023; 23(1): 1000.
  34. Patil GV, Lakhe P, Niranjane P. Maxillary expansion and Its effects on circummaxillary structures: a review. Cureus 2023; 15(1): e33755.
  35. Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 2018; 126(5): 1763–8.
  36. Saini P, Maurya RJ, Singh H. Time-saving scoring chart for the American Board of Orthodontics’ objective grading system. APOS Trends Orthod 2020; 10(4): 262–5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2024-0016 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 18
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2024
Published on: Jul 17, 2024
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year

© 2024 Alizae Marny Fadzlin Syed Mohamed, Nurul Naziha Yusop, Nurul Sabryna Rasidi, Asma Ashari, Amy Liew Kia Cheen, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.