Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Biomechanical aging behaviour of clear aligners Cover

Biomechanical aging behaviour of clear aligners

Open Access
|Mar 2024

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Flexural strength of the clear aligners was affected by the simulated aging process.

Table I.

Translucency and surface roughness of clear aligners did not change significantly during the 21-day study (P > 0.05 for all, n = 3 in each group)

Translucency ParameterRoughness – internal surface (μm)Roughness – external surface (μm)
LowerUpperLowerUpperLowerUpper
DayMean±SD95% CI95% CIP-valueMean±SD95% CI95% CIP-valueMean±SD95% CI95% CIP-value
03.69 ± 0.662.055.34P > 0.055.53 ± 0.264.896.17P > 0.051.34 ± 0.041.231.44P > 0.05
14.97 ± 3.32-3.2713.20P > 0.055.30 ± 0.234.745.87P > 0.051.53 ± 0.101.281.77P > 0.05
24.31 ± 4.25-6.2414.86P > 0.055.64 ± 0.83.657.64P > 0.051.72 ± 0.061.581.87P > 0.05
33.10 ± 1.84-1.477.67P > 0.055.65 ± 0.673.977.32P > 0.051.44 ± 0.500.192.69P > 0.05
44.93 ± 2.91-2.3012.17P > 0.055.39 ± 0.414.376.4P > 0.051.60 ± 0.540.272.93P > 0.05
54.85 ± 0.912.587.12P > 0.055.33 ± 0.583.96.77P > 0.051.45 ± 0.300.72.2P > 0.05
64.50 ± 1.590.548.46P > 0.055.45 ± 0.494.246.65P > 0.051.45 ± 0.250.842.07P > 0.05
73.87 ± 0.752.015.73P > 0.055.58 ± 0.215.056.1P > 0.051.29 ± 0.190.821.75P > 0.05
84.72 ± 0.353.865.59P > 0.055.47 ± 0.494.256.68P > 0.051.38 ± 0.500.142.62P > 0.05
93.20 ± 1.59-0.767.15P > 0.055.27 ± 1.072.617.94P > 0.051.48 ± 0.450.372.59P > 0.05
102.35 ± 0.840.274.44P > 0.055.23 ± 0.653.616.86P > 0.051.65 ± 0.061.511.79P > 0.05
113.89 ± 1.61-0.117.89P > 0.055.64 ± 0.035.555.73P > 0.051.72 ± 0.051.591.85P > 0.05
122.35 ± 0.191.862.83P > 0.055.39 ± 0.194.925.87P > 0.051.52 ± 0.131.21.84P > 0.05
134.76 ± 1.431.208.32P > 0.055.54 ± 0.085.335.74P > 0.051.34 ± 0.510.072.61P > 0.05
142.51 ± 1.06-0.125.14P > 0.055.45 ± 0.524.156.74P > 0.051.55 ± 0.450.422.67P > 0.05
152.53 ± 0.331.723.34P > 0.055.80 ± 0.035.735.87P > 0.051.27 ± 0.051.141.41P > 0.05
163.62 ± 1.96-1.248.49P > 0.055.57 ± 0.524.276.86P > 0.051.75 ± 0.251.142.36P > 0.05
172.36 ± 0.391.403.32P > 0.055.53 ± 0.195.076.00P > 0.051.72 ± 0.101.461.98P > 0.05
182.65 ± 1.30-0.575.88P > 0.055.78 ± 0.275.16.46P > 0.051.63 ± 0.241.042.23P > 0.05
195.97 ± 1.352.639.32P > 0.055.41 ± 0.773.57.31P > 0.051.81 ± 0.091.582.05P > 0.05
203.75 ± 1.88-0.918.41P > 0.055.28 ± 0.783.347.21P > 0.051.68 ± 0.181.232.14P > 0.05
214.49 ± 0.752.646.34P > 0.055.31 ± 0.783.367.25P > 0.051.70 ± 0.251.072.32P > 0.05
Figure 2.

Surface roughness of the clear aligners was not significantly changed by the simulated aging process.

Table II.

Tensile strength and maximum load of the clear aligners did not change significantly during the 21-day study (P > 0.05 for all, n=3 in each group)

Tensile strength (N/mm2)Maximum load (N/mm2)
LowerUpperLowerUpper
DayMean±SD95% CI95% CIP-valueMean±SD95% CI95% CIP-value
020.85 ± 1.0818.1823.53> 0.05104.26 ± 5.3818.1823.53> 0.05
120.55 ± 2.7516.1724.92> 0.05102.74 ± 13.7516.1724.92> 0.05
221.38 ± 3.3816.0026.76> 0.05106.89 ± 16.9116.0026.76> 0.05
319.87 ± 3.1014.9324.80> 0.0599.34 ± 15.5014.9324.80> 0.05
420.28 ± 2.4416.4124.16> 0.05101.42 ± 12.1816.4124.16> 0.05
520.98 ± 3.2015.8826.08> 0.05104.91 ± 16.0215.8826.08> 0.05
620.01 ± 2.6115.8524.16> 0.05100.05 ± 13.0615.8524.16> 0.05
719.02 ± 0.4818.2619.78> 0.0595.11 ± 2.3918.2619.78> 0.05
821.70 ± 3.9015.4927.91> 0.05108.50 ± 19.5115.4927.91> 0.05
920.11 ± 3.0115.3224.91> 0.05100.57 ± 15.0615.3224.91> 0.05
1018.98 ± 4.3412.0725.88> 0.0594.89 ± 21.6912.0725.88> 0.05
1122.02 ± 2.4618.1025.93> 0.05110.08 ± 12.3018.1025.93> 0.05
1218.22 ± 3.4812.6723.76> 0.0591.08 ± 17.4212.6723.76> 0.05
1318.95 ± 2.8414.4323.46> 0.0594.74 ± 14.1814.4323.46> 0.05
1418.82 ± 1.5616.3321.31> 0.0594.08 ± 7.8216.3321.31> 0.05
1521.11 ± 2.6116.9525.26> 0.05105.53 ± 13.0516.9525.26> 0.05
1620.43 ± 4.6713.0127.85> 0.05102.15 ± 23.3313.0127.85> 0.05
1719.45 ± 3.1114.5124.40> 0.0597.27 ± 15.5314.5124.40> 0.05
1818.93 ± 0.3218.4119.44> 0.0594.65 ± 1.6218.4119.44> 0.05
1921.08 ± 1.7518.2923.86> 0.05105.38 ± 8.7518.2923.86> 0.05
2018.40 ± 2.8013.9422.86> 0.0591.99 ± 14.0113.9422.86> 0.05
2117.63 ± 3.5811.9423.32> 0.0588.17 ± 17.8811.9423.32> 0.05
Figure 3.

Hardness of the clear aligners was significantly reduced after 10 days of the simulated aging process.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2024-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 60 - 66
Submitted on: Dec 1, 2023
Accepted on: Feb 1, 2024
Published on: Mar 20, 2024
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2024 Li Mei, Carrol Jin, Aishah Na, Jamie Marra, Simon Guan, Joanne Choi, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.