Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of the cytotoxicity of 3D-printed aligners using different post-curing procedures: an in vitro study Cover

Comparison of the cytotoxicity of 3D-printed aligners using different post-curing procedures: an in vitro study

Open Access
|Aug 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Digital models imported into the software.

Figure 2.

Digital design of the aligner.

Figure 3.

Printing supports.

Figure 4.

Printing process.

Figure 5.

Final 3D-printed aligner.

Differences among groups (P1, C+, P2) and MTT timings (7 and 14 d)_

SourceType III sum of squaresdfMean squareF testP value
Group7.37423.687166.341<0.001***
MTT4.97814.978224.604<0.001***
Group*MTT1.44420.72232.567<0.001***

Descriptive and Inferential Statistics of Cell Viability, expressed in percentage (%)

Day 7Day 14
GroupMean ± SD (%)CytotoxicityMean ± SD (%)Cytotoxicity
P1107.12 ± 17.47 AaNone106.74 ± 18.41 ANone
C+100.00 ± 24.71 A/100.00 ± 18.61 A/
P259.79 ± 10.06***BModerate47.09 ± 20.62*** BModerate
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2023-0026 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 56
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2023
|
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2023
|
Published on: Aug 14, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Campobasso Alessandra, Ariano Anastasia, Battista Giovanni, Posa Francesca, Migliorati Marco, Drago Sara, Lo Muzio Eleonora, Mori Giorgio, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.