Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A comparison of bond strength and adhesive remnant index of 3D-printed and metal orthodontic brackets attached using different adhesives Cover

A comparison of bond strength and adhesive remnant index of 3D-printed and metal orthodontic brackets attached using different adhesives

Open Access
|Aug 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

(A) The flexural strength measurement. (B) Vickers Hardness measurement.

Figure 2.

Aesthetic orthodontic bracket made of permanent crown resin using 3D printing technology.

Figure 3.

SBS measurement in the experimental and control groups.

Figure 4.

Evaluation of ARI scores after debonding.

Distribution of Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) Scores between the groups

ARI Scores
01234P*
3D Print Bracket-Transbond XT001131
3D Print Bracket-Tokuyama SuperLow043710.008
Metal Bracket-Transbond XT14631
Metal Bracket-Tokuyama SuperLow004101

Comparison of mean values of the shear bond strength of 3D Print bracket and metal brackets

Shear bond strength (MPa)
MeanStandard deviationP*
3D Print Bracket-Transbond XT7.91A3.07
3D Print Bracket-Tokuyama SuperLow13.07B5.31
<0.001
Metal Bracket-Transbond XT15.03B6.66
Metal Bracket-Tokuyama SuperLow8.32A3.00
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2023-0024 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 32 - 39
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2023
|
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2023
|
Published on: Aug 14, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Kevser Kurt Demirsoy, Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk, Feridun Abay, Huseyin Simsek, Esra Ozcelik, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.