Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The applicability of the Tanaka and Johnston analysis in a contemporary Western Australian population Cover

The applicability of the Tanaka and Johnston analysis in a contemporary Western Australian population

Open Access
|Jul 2022

References

  1. Kuswandari S, Nishino M. Mixed dentition space analysis for Indonesian Javanese children. Pediatr Dent J 2006;16:74–83.
  2. Alther ER, Koroluk LD, Phillips C. Influence of sex and ethnic tooth-size differences on mixed-dentition space analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:332–9.
  3. Sillman J. Dimensional changes of the dental arches: a longitudinal study from birth to 25 years. Am J Orthod 1964;50:824–42.
  4. Lee-Chan S, Jacobson BN, Chwa KH, Jacobson RS. Mixed dentition analysis for Asian-Americans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:293–9.
  5. Moyer RE. Handbook of Orthodontics., 4th ed. Chicago: Mosby-year book medical publisher; 1958:577.
  6. Tanaka MM, Johnston LE. The prediction of the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary orthodontic population. J Am Dent Assoc 1974;88:798–801.
  7. Bishara SE, Staley RN. Mixed-dentition mandibular arch length analysis: a step-by-step approach using the revised Hixon-Oldfather prediction method. Am J Orthod 1984;86:130–5.
  8. Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA. Orthodontic probability tables for black patients of African descent: mixed dentition analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:545–51.
  9. Bernabe E, Flores-Mir C. Are the lower incisors the best predictors for the unerupted canine and premolars sums ? an analysis of a Peruvian sample. Angle Orthod 2005;75:202–7.
  10. Lima Martinelli F, Martinelli de Lima E, Rocha R, Tirre-Araujo MS. Prediction of lower permanent canine and premolars width by correlation methods. Angle Orthod 2005;75:805–8.
  11. Staley RN, O’Gorman TW, Hoag JF, Shelly TH. Prediction of the widths of unerupted canines and premolars. J Am Dent Assoc 1984;108:185–90.
  12. Staley RN, Kerber PE. A revision of the Hixon and Oldfather mixed-dentition prediction method. Am J Orthod 1980;78:296–302.
  13. Hixon EH, Old Fther RE. Estimation of the sizes of unerupted cuspid and bicuspid teeth. Angle Orthod 1958;28:236–40.
  14. de Paula S, Almeida MA, Lee PC. Prediction of mesiodistal diameter of unerupted lower canines and premolars using 45 degrees cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:309–14.
  15. Diagne F, Diop-Ba K, Ngom PI, Mbow K. Mixed dentition analysis in a Senegalese population: elaboration of prediction tables. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:178–83.
  16. Al-Bitar ZB, Al-Omari IK, Sonbol HN, Al-Ahmad HT, Hamdan AM. Mixed dentition analysis in a Jordanian population. Angle Orthod 2008;78:670–5.
  17. Nourallah AW, Gesch D, Khordaji MN, Splieth C. New regression equations for predicting the size of unerupted canines and premolars in a contemporary population. Angle Orthod 2002;72:216–21.
  18. Bailit HL. Dental variation among populations. An anthropologic view. Dental Clinics of North America 1975;19:125.
  19. Jaroontham J, Godfrey K. Mixed dentition space analysis in a Thai population. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:127–34.
  20. Legovic M, Novosel A, Legovic A. Regression equations for determining mesiodistal crown diameters of canines and premolars. Angle Orthod 2003;73:314–8.
  21. Frankel HH, Benz EM. Mixed dentition analysis for black Americans. Pediatr Dent 1986;8:226–30.
  22. Rheude B, Lionel SP, Ferriera A, Jacobson A. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod 2005;75:300–4.
  23. Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D, Ho Christopher TC. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for Bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J 2009;25:97–103.
  24. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101–5.
  25. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794–803.
  26. Garino F, Garino G. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World J Orthod 2002;3:250–4.
  27. Zilberman O, Huggare J, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003;73:301–6.
  28. Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O’Neill J, Noar JH. Digital versus plaster study models: How accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod 2012;39:151–9.
  29. Krieger E, Seiferth J, Saric I, Jung BA, Wehrbein H. Accuracy of invisalign® treatments in the anterior tooth region. J Orofac Orthop 2011;72:141–9.
  30. Grünheid T, Patel N, De Felippe NL, Wey A, Gaillard PR, Larson BE. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:157–64.
  31. Luu NS, Mandich MA, Tieu LD, Kaipatur N, Flores-Mir C. The validity and reliability of mixed-dentition analysis methods: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:1143–53.
  32. Santos IRMD, Noronha WP. Examination of Tanaka & Johnston’s prediction regarding mesiodistal measurements of unerupted canines and premolars. RGO. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (Online) 2013;61:55–60.
  33. Tayyab M, Hussain U, Ayub A. Applicability of Tanaka and Johnston mixed dentition analysis in a Peshawar sample. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal 2014;34:322–5.
  34. Dhakal J, Shrestha RM, Shrestha S. Applicability of Tanaka & Johnston Analysis and Prediction of New Equation for Contemporary Nepalese Sample. Orthod J Nepal 2013;3:14–8.
  35. Pardede DAD, Budiardjo SB, Rizal MF. Applicability of Tanaka-Johnston mixed-dentition analysis in Indonesian children. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research 2017;10:486–9.
  36. Thimmegowda U, Divyashree, Niwlikar KB, Khare V, Prabhakar AC. Applicability of Tanaka Johnston Method and Prediction of Mesiodistal Width of Canines and Premolars in Children. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:Zc16–Zc19.
  37. Arslan SG, Dildeş N, Kama JD, Gen C. Mixed-dentition analysis in a Turkish population. World J Orthod 2009;10:135–40.
  38. Carey C. Linear arch dimension and tooth size: An evaluation of the bone and dental structures in cases involving the possible reduction of dental units in treatment. Am J Orthod 1949;35:762–75.
  39. Moyers RE Moyers RE. Analysis of dentition and occlusion. Handbook of orthodontics, 4th ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1988.
  40. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Abdallah EM, Garcia AF. Comparisons of mesiodistal and buccolingual crown dimensions of the permanent teeth in three populations from Egypt, Mexico, and the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:416–22.
  41. Yuen KK, Tang EL, So LL. Mixed dentition analysis for Hong Kong Chinese. Angle Orthod 1998;68:21–8.
  42. Mahmoud BK, Abu Asab SHI, Taib H. Accuracy of four tooth size prediction methods on Malay population. International Scholarly Research Notices 2012;2012:1–4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2022-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 153 - 161
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2022
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2022
Published on: Jul 6, 2022
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2022 Sidra Abaid, Sobia Zafar, Estie Kruger, Marc Tennant, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.