References
- Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45–66.
- Kumar V, Ludlow J, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Rad 2007;36:263–269.
- Williams FLE, Richtsmeier JT. Comparison of mandibular landmarks from computed tomography and 3D digitizer data. Clin Anat 2003;16:494–500.
- Pinsky H, Dyda S, Pinsky R, Misch K, Sarment D. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Rad 2006;35:410–416.
- Silva MAG, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofac 2008;133:640.e641–640. e645.
- Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrián R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images. Angle Orthod 2011;81:856–864.
- Mingming WU, Liu Z, Yuan F, Zhang M. Comparison of individual normal occlusion measured by CBCT images and lateral cephalograms. Stomatology 2016;36:523–527.
- Li N. Study of the cone-beam CT in clinical of orthodontic diagnosis and analysis Chongqing: Chongqing Medical University Master; 2012.
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336–341.
- Alsufyani N, Flores-Mir C, Major P. Three-dimensional segmentation of the upper airway using cone beam CT: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Rad 2012;41:276–284.
- Lagravere MO, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Long-term skeletal changes with rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review. Angle Orthod 2005;75:1046–1052.
- Li Y, Deng S, Mei L, Li J, Qi M, Su S. Accuracy of alveolar bone height and thickness measurements in cone beam computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med O 2019;128:667–679.
- Zimmerman JN, Lee J, Pliska BT. Reliability of upper pharyngeal airway assessment using dental CBCT: a systematic review. Eur J Orthodont 2017;39:489–496.
- Yang F, Qin H. Methodological study of CBCT 3D cephalometric applied in craniofacial growth. Journal of Wenzhou Medical College 2012;42:232–236.
- Jung PK, Lee GC, Moon CH. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography cephalometric measurements using a midsagittal projection and conventional two-dimensional cephalometric measurements. Korean J Orthod 2015;45:282.
- Miao LI, Zhang KY, Xiaohui MA, Li SU, Wang H. Three-dimensional cephalometry of skeletal Class malformation patients. Beijing Journal of Stomatology 2016;24:323–327.
- Wen J, Liu S, Ye X, Xie X, Li J, Li H. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities. J Am Dent Assoc 2017;12:148.
- Zhiyao LU, Qiu S, Hao J, Hanying YU, Jin Z, Chen J. 3D morphology analysis of craniofacial hard tissues of the youths with normal occlusion in Xi’an. Journal of Practical Stomatology 2016;32:372–376.
- Jain S, Choudhary K, Nagi R, Shukla S, Grover D. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies. Imagng Sci Dent 2019;49:179.
- Liu Y, Zhao J, Ding Y, Xu T. Precision of cephalometric landmark identification from cone-beam computed tomography. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2010;17:61–65.
- J Z, S Z. Advances in the application of cone beam computed tomography in the quantitative measurement of orthodontics. Chin J Stomatol Res 2010;4:400–403.
- Tadinada A, Marczak A, Yadav S, Mukherjee PM. Applications of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics: A Review. Turk. J Orthod 2016;29:73–79.
- Rios HF, Borgnakke WS, Benavides E. The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Management of Patients Requiring Dental Implants: An American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Review. J Periodontol 2017;88:946–959.
- Kapila SD, Nervina JM. CBCT in orthodontics: assessment of treatment outcomes and indications for its use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20140282.
- Guerrero ME, Noriega J, Jacobs R. Preoperative implant planning considering alveolar bone grafting needs and complication prediction using panoramic versus CBCT images. Imaging Sci Dent 2014;44:213–220.
- Mendonça LM, Gaêta-Araujo H, Cruvinel PB, Tosin IW, Azenha MR, Ferraz EP. Can diagnostic changes caused by cone beam computed tomography alter the clinical decision in impacted lower third molar treatment plan. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2021;50:20200412.
- Merrett SJ, Drage NA, Durning P. Cone beam computed tomography: a useful tool in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. J Orthod 2009;36:202–210.
- Eslami E, Barkhordar H, Abramovitch K, Kim J, Masoud MI. Cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional radiography in visualization of maxillary impacted-canine localization: A systematic review of comparative studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2017;151:248–258.
- Yeung A, Jacobs R, Bornstein MM. Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: a review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities. Clin Oral Invest 2019;23:2573–2581.
- Feragalli B, Rampado O, Abate C, Macrì M, Festa F, Stromei F. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols. Radiol Med 2017;122:581–588.
- Kissel P, Mah JK, Bumann A. Modern 3D cephalometry in pediatric orthodontics—downsizing the FOV and development of a new 3D cephalometric analysis within a minimized large FOV for dose reduction. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25:4651–4670.
- Guerrero ME, Noriega J, Jacobs R. Preoperative implant planning considering alveolar bone grafting needs and complication prediction using panoramic versus CBCT images. Imaging Sci Dent 2014;44:213–220.
- Codari M, Caffini M, Tartaglia GM, Sforza C, Baselli G. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2017;12:113–121.