References
- Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45-66.
- Hans M, Valiathan M, Palomo J. Cone Beam Computed Tomography: a link with the past, a promise for the future. Semin Orthod. 2011;17:81-7.
- Athanasiou AE, van der Meij AJW. Posteroanterior (frontal) cephalometry. In: Athanasiou, AE(ed): Orthodontic Cephalometry. Mosby-Wolfe. London. 1995:141-161.
- Keim RG, Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS 3rd. 2008 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures: Part 1, results and trends. J Clin Orthod 2008;42:625-40.
- Betts NJ, Vanarsdall R, Barber HD, Higgins-Barber K, Fonseca RJ. Diagnosis and treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1995;10:75-96.
- Leonardi R, Annunziata A, Caltabiano M. Landmark identification error in posteroanterior cephalometric radiography. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2008;78:761-5.
- Malkoc S, Sari Z, Usumez S, Koyuturk AE. The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:15-21.
- Ghafari J, Cater PE, Shofer FS. Effect of film-object distance on posteroanterior cephalometric measurements: suggestions for standardized cephalometric methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:30-7.
- Pirttiniemi P, Miettinen J, Kantomaa T. Combined effects of error in frontal-view asymmetry diagnosis. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:629-36.
- Yoon Y, Kim D, Yu P, Kim H, Choi E, Kim K. Effect of head rotation on posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs. Angle Orthod 2002;72:36-42.
- van Vlijmen O, Bergé S, Bronckhorst E, Swennen G, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman A. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone-beam CT and conventional frontal radiographs from human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:773-8.
- Major P, Johnson D, Hesse K, Glover K. Landmark identication error in posterior anterior cephalometrics. Angle Orthod. 1994:447-454.
- Scarfe W, Farman A. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:707-30.
- Mah J, Huang J, Choo H. Practical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in Orthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:Suppl. 3.7s-13s.
- Betts N, Lisenby W. Normal adult transverse jaw values obtained using standardized posteroanterior cephalometrics.(Abstract). J Dent Res 1994;73:298.
- Betts N, Sturtz D, Aldrich D. Treatment of transverse (width) discrepancies in patients who require isolated mandibular surgery: the case for maxillary expansion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:361-4.
- Gribel BF, Gribel MN, Frazäo DC, McNamara JA Jr, Manzi F. Accuracy and reliability of craniometric measurements on lateral cephalometry and 3D measurements on CBCT scans. Angle Orthod 2011;81:26-35.
- Berco M, Rigali PH Jr, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:17.e1-17.e9.
- Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;19:228-31.
- Lascala C, Panella J, Marques M. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:291-4.
- Stratemann S, Huang J, Maki K, Miller A, Hatcher D. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:80-93.
- Damstra J, Fourie Z, Huddleston Slater J, Ren Y. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomograph-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:e1-16.e6.
- Ozsoy U, Demirel B, Yildirim F, Tosun O, Sarikcioglu L. Method selection in craniofacial measurements: advantages and disadvantages of 3D digitization method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009;37:285-90.
- Legrell P, Nyquist H, Isberg A. Validity of identification of gonion and antegonion in frontal cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2000;70:157-64.
- Schlicher W, Nielsen I, Huang J, Maki K, Hatcher D, Miller A. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomgraph scans. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:263-75.
- Periago D, Scarfe W, Moshiri M, Scheetz J, Silveira A, Farman A. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone Beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 2008;78:387-95.
- Baumrind S, Frantz R. The reliability of head film measurements 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:505-517.
- El-Mangoury N, Shaheen S, Mostafa Y. Landmark identification in computerized posteroanterior cephalometrics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:57-61.
- Wong R, Chau A, Hägg U. 3D CBCT McNamara’s cephalometric analysis in an adult southern Chinese popluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:920-5.
- Stratemann S, Huang J, Maki K, Hatcher D, Miller A. Evaluating the human mandible with cone beam computed tomgraphy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:(Suppl.)S58-570.
- Kapila S, Conley R, Harrell Jr W. The current status of cone beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:24-34.
- Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Hilgers JJ, Schulhof R. An overview of computerized cephalometrics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1972;61:1-28.
- Athanasiou AE, DroschI H, Bosch C. Data and patterns of transverse dentofacial structure of 6-to-15-year old children: a posterioranterior cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:465-71.
- Cortella S, Shofer F, Ghafari J. Transverse development of the jaws: norms for the posteroanterior cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:519-22.
- Kau C, Richmond S, Palomo J, Hans M. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomgraphy in orthodontics. J Orthod 2005;32:282-93.
- Bayram M, Kayipmaz S, Sezgin O, Küçük M. Volumetric analysis of the mandibular condyle using cone beam computed tomgoraphy. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:1812-16.
- Deguchi T, Katashiba S, Inami T, Foong K, Huak C. Morphologic quantification of the maxilla and the mandible with cone-beam computed tomgraphy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:218-22.
- Nair R, Deguchi T, Li X, Katashiba S, Chan Y. Quantitative analysis of the maxilla and the mandible in hyper- and hypodivergent skeletal class II pattern. Orthod Craniofac Res 2009;12:9-13.
- Chang ZC, Hu FC, Lai E, Yao CC, Chen MH, Chen YJ. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e289-97.
- Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008;78:873-9.
- Kumar V, Ludlow J, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:263-9.
- The American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: an advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143:899-902.