References
- Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971;60:111-27.
- Midgård J, Björk G, Linder-Aronson S. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks and errors of measurements of cephalometric cranial distances. Angle Orthod 1974;44:56-61.
- Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83:382-90.
- Houston WJ, Maher RE, McElroy D, Sherriff M. Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:149-51.
- Onkosuwito EM, Katsaros C, van’t Hof MA, Bodegom JC, Kuipers-Jagtman AM. The reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of analogue and digital methods. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:655-65.
- Liu JK, Chen YT, Cheng KS. Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2000;118:535–540.
- Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;129:611-18.
- Halazonetis DJ. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:627-37.
- Hatcher DC, Aboudara CL. Diagnosis goes digital. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:512-15.
- Mah J, Hatcher DC. Three-dimensional craniofacial imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:308-9.
- Ghoneima A, Abdel-Fattah E, Eraso F, Fardo D, Kula K, Hartsfield J. Skeletal and dental changes after rapid maxillary expansion: a computed tomography study. Aust Orthod J 2010;26:141-8.
- Ghoneima A, Abdel-Fattah E, Hartsfield J, El-Bedwehi A, Kamel A, Kula K. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on the cranial and circummaxillary sutures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:510-19.
- Richardson A. A comparison of traditional and computerized methods of cephalometric analysis. Eur J Orthod 1981;3:15-20.
- Sandler PJ. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements. Br J Orthod 1988;15:105-10.
- Gravely JF, Benzies PM. The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry. Br J Orthod 1974;1:95-101.
- Chen YJ, Chen SK, Yao JC, Chang HF. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry. Angle Orthod 2004;74:155-161.
- Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod 1971;60:505-17.
- Kamoen A, Dermaut L, Verbeeck R. The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:569-78.
- Stabrun AE, Danielsen K. Precision in cephalometric landmark identification. Eur J Orthod 1982;4:185-96.
- Perillo MA, Beideman RW, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Higgins-Barber K, Laster LL, Ghafari JG. Effect of landmark identification on cephalometric measurements: guidelines for cephalometric analyses. Clin Orthod 2000;3:29-36.
- Broch J, Slagsvold O, Rosler M. Error in landmark identification in lateral radiographic headplates. Eur J Orthod 1981;3:9-13.
- Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL, Glover KE. Effect of head orientation on posterior anterior cephalometric landmark identification. Angle Orthod 1996;66:51-60.
- Kazandjian S, Kiliaridis S, Mavropoulos A. Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks. Angle Orthod 2006;76:619-24.
- Macri V, Wenzel A. Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:137-48.
- Cohen AM, Linney AD. A low cost system for computer-based cephalometric analysis. Br J Orthod 1986;13:105-8.
- Cevidanes LHS Franco AA, Gerig G, Proffit WR, Slice DE, Enlow DH, et al. Comparison of relative mandibular growth vectors using high resolution 3-dimensional imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005;128:27-34.
- Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF, Chen KC. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthod 2000;70:387-92.
- Bruntz LQ, Palomo JM, Baden S, Hans MG. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006;130:340-8.
- Sekiguchi T, Savara BS. Variability of cephalometric landmarks used for face growth studies. Am J Orthod 1972;61:603-18.
- Swennen GR, Barth EL, Schutyser F, De Groeve P, Lemaitre A. Three-dimensional (3-D) cephalometry. The basics for virtual planning. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 2004;32:(Suppl 1)135.
- Swennen GR, Schutyser F, Barth EL, De Groeve P, De Mey A. A new method of 3-D cephalometry. Part I: the anatomic cartesian 3-D reference system. J Craniofac Surg 2006;17:314-25.
- Cavalcanti MG, Hailer JW, Vannier MW. Three-dimensional computed tomography landmark measurement in craniofacial surgical planning: experimental validation in vitro. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:690-4.
- Kumar V, Ludlow J, Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008;78:873-9.
- Olmez H, Gorgulu S,Akin E, Bengi AO, Tekdemir I, Ors F. Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method. Angle Orthod 2011;81:375-82.