Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The safety zone for mini-implant maxillary anchorage in Mongoloids Cover

The safety zone for mini-implant maxillary anchorage in Mongoloids

Open Access
|Aug 2023

References

  1. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(4 Suppl):S43-51.
  2. Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, Carano A. ‘Safe zones’: a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod 2006;76:191-7.
  3. Cope JB. Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics: a paradigm shift. Semin Orthod 2005;11:3-9.
  4. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:S43-51.
  5. Ohnishi H, Yagi T, Yasuda Y, Takada K. A mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage in a deep overbite case. Angle Orthod 2005;75:444-52.
  6. Kitai N, Yasuda Y, Takada K. A stent fabricated on a selectively colored stereolithographic model for placement of orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2002;17:264-6.
  7. Kim SH, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Chung KR, Kook YA, Nelson G. Surgical positioning of orthodontic mini-implants with guides fabricated on models replicated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:S82-9.
  8. Carano A, Velo S, Incorvati C, Poggio P. Clinical application of the Mini-Screw-Anchorage-System (M.A.S.) in the maxillary alveolar bone. Prog Orthod 2004;5:212-30.
  9. Schnelle MA, Beck FM, Jaynes RM, Huja SS. A radiographic evaluation of the availability of bone for placement of miniscrews. Angle Orthod 2004;74:832-7.
  10. Lavelle CL. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Orthod 1972;61;29-37.
  11. Park HS. An anatomic study using CT images for the implantation of micro-implants. Korean J Orthod 2002;32:435-41.
  12. Ishii T, Nojima K, Nishii Y, Takaki T, Yamaguchi H. Evaluation of the implantation position of mini-screws for orthodontic treatment in the maxillary molar area by a micro CT. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2004;45:165-72.
  13. Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:721.e7-12.
  14. Kim GT, Kim SH, Choi YS, Park YJ, Chung KR, Suk KE, Choo HR, Huang JC. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of orthodontic miniplate anchoring screws in the posterior maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:628.e1-10.
  15. Heins PJ, Wieder SM. A histologic study of the width and nature of inter-radicular spaces in human pre-molars and molars. J Dent Res 1986;65;948-51.
  16. Madrigal C, Ortega R, Meniz C, López-Quiles J. Study of available bone for interforaminal implant treatment using cone-beam computed tomography. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E307-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2012-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2207-7480 | Journal ISSN: 2207-7472
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 21
Submitted on: Jul 1, 2010
Accepted on: Jan 1, 2012
Published on: Aug 1, 2023
Published by: Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Mang Chek Wey, Chung Nam Shim, Meng Yit Lee, Marhazlinda Jamaluddin, Wei Cheong Ngeow, published by Australian Society of Orthodontists Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.