References
- Clark WJ. The twin block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:1–18.
- Proffit WR., Fields HW, Sarver DM, Contemporary orthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Elsevier, 2007;287–95.
- Lee RT, Kyi CS, Mack GJ. A controlled clinical trial of the effects of the Twin Block and Dynamax appliances on the hard and soft tissues. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:272–82.
- Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA, Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:599 (online only).
- Gill DS, Lee RT. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:465–72; quiz 517.
- Lund DI, Sandler PJ. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:104–10.
- Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:15–24.
- Araujo AM, Buschang PH, Melo AC. Adaptive condylar growth and mandibular remodelling changes with bionator therapy – an implant study. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:515–22.
- Jena AK, Duggal R., Parkash H. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:594–602.
- Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 1983;5:1–46.
- Solow B, Houston WJ. Mandibular rotations: concepts and terminology. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:177–9.
- Clark WJ. Twin block functional therapy: applications in dentofacial orthopedics. Turin: Mosby-Wolfe;1995.
- Björk A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. Am J Orthod 1972; 62:339–83.
- Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83:382–90.
- Lundström F, Lundström A. Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:244–7.
- Björk A, Skieller V. Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. Br J Orthod 1977;4:53–64.
- Björk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 1969;55:585–99.
- You QL, Hägg U. A comparison of three superimposition methods. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:717–25.
- Fields HW. Treatment of skeletal problems in preadolescent children. In: Proffit WR, editor. Contemporary orthodontics. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book;1993:423–69.
- Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: Allen & Unwin;1940.
- Buschang PH, Tanguay R, Demirjian A. Cephalometric reliability. A full ANOVA model for the estimation of true and error variance. Angle Orthod 1987;57:168–75.
- Kim J, Nielsen IL. A longitudinal study of condylar growth and mandibular rotation in untreated subjects with class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2002;72:105–11.
- Paulsen HU. Morphological changes of the TMJ condyles of 100 patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the period of puberty to adulthood: a long-term radiographic study. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:657–68.
- Melo AC, Santos-Pinto A, Martins JC, Martins LP, Sakima MT. Orthopedic and orthodontic components of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion correction with Balters Bionator: a cephalometric study with metallic implants. World J Orthod 2003;4:237–42.
- Carter GM, Harkness EM. Alterations to mandibular form following motor denervation of the masseter muscle. An experimental study in the rat. J Anat 1995;186:541–8.
- Ma B, Sampson WJ, Wiebkin OW, Wilson DF, Fazzalari N. Trabecular anisotropy and collagen fibre orientation in the mandibular condyle following experimental functional appliance treatment using sheep. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006;19:35–42.
- Chintakanon K, Sampson WJ, Wilkinson TM, Townsend GC. A prospective study in twin block appliance therapy assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:494–504.